Skip to main content Accessibility help


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Martin Fieder
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Susanne Huber
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Elmar Pichl
Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy of Austria, Vienna, Austria
Bernard Wallner
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Department of Behavioral Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Horst Seidler
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria


For modern Western societies with a regime of monogamy, it has recently been demonstrated that the socioeconomic status of men is positively associated with being or having been married. This study aims to compare marriage patterns (if a person has been married at least once) for cultures with a tradition of monogamy and polygyny. As no worldwide data on polygyny exist, religion was used as a proxy for monogamy (Christians) vs polygyny (Muslims). The analyses were based on 2000–2011 census data from 39 countries worldwide for 52,339,594 men and women, controlling for sex, sex ratio, age, education, migration within the last 5 years and employment. Overall, a higher proportion of Muslims were married compared with Christians, but the difference in the fraction of married men compared with married women at a certain age (the ‘marriage gap’) was much more pronounced in Muslims than in Christians, i.e. compared with Christians, a substantially higher proportion of Muslim women than men were married up to the age of approximately 31 years. As expected for a tradition of polygyny, the results indicate that the socioeconomic threshold for entering marriage is higher for Muslim than Christian men, and Muslim women in particular face a negative effect of socioeconomic status on the probability of ever being married. The large ‘marriage gap’ at a certain age in Muslim societies leads to high numbers of married women and unmarried young men, and may put such polygenic societies under pressure.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Alarie, M. & Carmichael, J. T. (2015) The ‘cougar’ phenomenon: an examination of the factors that influence age, hypogamous sexual relationships among middle aged women. Journal of Marriage and Family 77, 12501265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988) Reproductive Success in Three Kipsigis Cohorts . In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.) Reproductive Success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 419438.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. & Li, A. (2003) May–December: Canadians in age-discrepant relationships. Canadian Social Trends 70, 2933.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D. & Kenrick, D. T. (2002) Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships 9(3), 271278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. & Caldwell, P. (1987) The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review 13, 409437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, S. (2011) Marriage and power: age at first marriage and spousal age gap in lesser-developed countries. History of the Family 16, 416436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, S. L. & Levesque, L. M. (2004) Dating preferences of women born between 1945 and 1960. Journal of Family Issues 25, 833846.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (1988) Life history, blood revenge and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239, 985992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamie, J. (1986) Polygyny among Arabs. Population Studies 40, 5566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronk, L. (1989) Low socioeconomic status and female biased parental investment: the Mukogodo example. American Anthropologist 91, 414429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988) Homicide. Transaction Publishers.Google ScholarPubMed
Darroch, J. E., Landry, D. J. & Oslak, S. (1999) Age differences between sexual partners in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 31, 160167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Economist (2016) Of men and mayhem. Young, single, idle males are dangerous. Work and wedlock can tame them. The Economist, 23rd January 2016. URL: (accessed 15th February 2017).Google Scholar
Edlund, L., Hongbin, L., Junjian, Y. & Junsen, Z. (2007) More men, more crime: evidence from China’s one-child policy. Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion Paper Series, 2314, December 2007. URL: (accessed 15th February 2017).Google Scholar
Falen, D. J. (2008) Polygyny and Christian marriage in Africa: the case of Benin. African Studies Review 51, 5174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. & West, D. J. (1995) Effects of marriage, separation, and children on offending by adult males. Current Perspectives of Aging Life Cycle 4, 249281.Google Scholar
Fieder, M. & Huber, S. (2007a) The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 392398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieder, M. & Huber, S. (2007b) Parental age difference and offspring count in humans. Biology Letters 3(6), 689691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieder, M., Huber, S. & Bookstein, F. L. (2011) Socioeconomic status, marital status and childlessness in men and women: an analysis of census data from six countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 43, 619635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fieder, M., Huber, S., Bookstein, F. L., Iber, K., Schäfer, K., Winckler, G. & Wallner, B. (2005) Status and reproduction in humans: new evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology 111, 940950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, W. H., Bolin, J. E. & Kelley, K. (2014) Multilevel Modeling Using R. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Flake, K. (2005) The Politics of American Religious Identity: The Seating of Senator Reed Smoot, Mormon Apostle. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A. & Mace, R. (2007) Polygyny, reproductive success and child health in rural Ethiopia: why marry a married man? Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 287300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackett, C., Connor, P., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potancoko, M. & Abel, G. (2015) The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections for 2010–2050. Pew Research Center. URL: (accessed 15th February 2017).Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2012) The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 367, 657669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopcroft, R. L. (2006) Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 27, 104120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopcroft, R. L. (2015) Sex differences in the relationship between status and number of offspring in the contemporary US. Evolution and Human Behavior 36, 146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horney, J., Osgood, D. W. & Marshall, I. H. (1995) Criminal careers in the short-term: intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review 60, 655673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, S., Bookstein, F. L. & Fieder, M. (2010) Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Human Biology 22, 578587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, V. M. & Den Boer, A. M. (2004) Bare Branches: The Security Implications of Asia’s Surplus Male Population. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ilkkaracan, P. (2001) Islam and women’s sexuality: a research report from Turkey. In Jung, P. B., Hunt, M. E. & Balakrishnan, R. (eds) Good Sex: Feminist Perspectives from the World’s Religions. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 6176.Google Scholar
Irons, W. (1979) Natural selection, adaptation and human social behavior. In Chagnon, N. A. & Irons, W. (eds) Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Duxbury Press, North Scitutae, US, pp. 213237.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., Fitzgerald, C. J. & Peterson, T. (2010) Female scarcity reduces women’s marital ages and increases variance in men’s marital ages. Evolutionary Psychology 8(3), 420431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, R., Pagel, M., Bowen, J. R., Otterbein, K. F., Ridley, M., Schweizer, T. & Voland, E. (1994) The comparative method in anthropology [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology 35, 549564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mealey, L. (1985) The relation between social status and biological success: a case study of the Mormon religious hierarchy. Ethology and Sociobiology 6, 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R., Sievert, S. & Kingholz, R. (2016) Krisenregion Mena. Wie demografische Veränderungen die Entwicklung im Nahen Osten und Nordafrika beeinflussen und was das für Europa bedeutet. Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. URL: (accessed 15th February 2017).Google Scholar
Nettle, D. & Pollet, T. V. (2008) Natural selection on male wealth in humans. American Naturalist 172, 658666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obermeyer, C. M. (1992) Islam, women, and politics: the demography of Arab countries. Population and Development Review 18, 3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2001) Flexibility in the marriage market. Population: An English Selection 13, 947.Google Scholar
Pollet, T. V. & Nettle, D. (2009) Market forces affect patterns of polygyny in Uganda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106, 21142117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, R. J. & Laub, J. H. (1995) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H. & Wimer, C. (2006) Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within individual causal effects. Criminology 44, 465508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, R. & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2015) Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans. Royal Society – Open Science 2(1), doi: 10.1098/rsos.140402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, R., Tharp, D. & Smith, K. R. (2016) Marriage markets and male mating effort: violence and crime are elevated where men are rare. Human Nature 27(4), 489500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, S. & Hassebrauck, M. (2012) Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Human Nature 23(4), 447466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidler, H. (1985) Warum leben Frauen länger? Geschlechtsverhältnis, Mortalität und Familienstand. Soziale Sicherheit 11, 371378.Google Scholar
Sigman, S. M. (2006) Everything lawyers know about polygamy is wrong. 16 Cornell J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 101. URL: (accessed 15th February 2017).Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, S. & Ohtsuka, R. (2003) Effects of polygyny and consanguinity on high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. Journal of Biosocial Science 35(4), 513526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voland, E. (1990) Differential reproductive success in the Krummhorn population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 165 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 03rd April 2017 - 3rd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-pwkpp Total loading time: 0.392 Render date: 2020-12-03T14:44:00.648Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Thu Dec 03 2020 13:58:51 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *