Skip to main content Accessibility help

Economic Analysis and Investment Priorities in Sweden’s Transport Sector

  • Henrik Andersson (a1), Lars Hultkrantz (a2), Gunnar Lindberg (a3) and Jan-Eric Nilsson (a4) (a5)


Beginning as a planning tool within Sweden’s national road administration some 50 years ago, benefit-cost analysis (BCA) has come to be a pillar of the national transport policy because of subsequent strategic choices made by the national parliament. These choices made it necessary to widen the analysis of costs to include also externalities and a foregone conclusion was that efficient investment priorities should be made based on BCA. But no one asked whether the political decision makers or the BCA models were up to that task. This paper reviews the institutional framework and practice of BCA in Sweden for transport infrastructure investment, and considers design issues that have been and still are debated, such as whether the discount rate should include a risk term and how to account for the marginal cost of public funds. A main concern with BCA results is the underestimation of construction costs, making transport sector projects look better than they are. Several ex post analyses have established that a higher NPV ratio increases the probability of being included in the investment program proposal prepared by the agency. The requirement to let projects undergo BCA seems to make planners “trim” project proposals by trying to reduce investment costs without significantly reducing benefits. This relationship is weaker among profitable projects. Moreover, there is no correlation between rate of return and the probability of being included in the final program, which is established on political grounds.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Abrantes, Pedro A. L. & Wardman, Mark R. (2011). Meta-Analysis of U.K. Values of Time: An Update. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(1), 117.
Algers, Staffan, Dillén, Johanna Lindqvist & Widlert, Staffan(1995). The National Swedish Value of Time Study. Stockholm, Transek consultancy.
Andersson, Henrik (2005). The Value of Safety as Revealed in the Swedish Car Market: An Application of the Hedonic Pricing Approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 211239.
Andersson, Henrik (2013). Consistency in Preferences for Road Safety: An Analysis of Precautionary and Stated Behavior. Research in Transportation Economics, 43(1), 4149.
Andersson, Henrik, Hole, Arne Risa & Svensson, Mikael (2016). Valuation of Small and Multiple Health Risks: A Critical Analysis of SP Data Applied to Food and Water Safety. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 4153.
ASEK (2016). Samhällsekonomiska principer och kalkylvärden för transportsektorn: ASEK 6.0. Borlänge, Sweden, Trafikverket,
Asplund, Disa & Eliasson, Jonas (2016). Does Uncertainty Make Cost-Benefit Analyses Pointless? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 195205.
Banverket (2009). Götalandsbanan Resultat Sampers Samkalk, Report 23-03-2009.
Belton, Valerie & Stewart, Theo (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach. US: Springer.
Birch Sörensen, Peter(2010). Swedish Tax Policy: Recent Trends and Future Challenges, Report to the Expert Group on Public Economics, ESO, Ministry of Finance, 2010:4.
Blanchard, Olivier & Fischer, Stanley (1989). Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blumenschein, Karen, Blomquist, Glenn C., Johannesson, Magnus, Horn, Nancy & Freeman, Patricia (2008). Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Economic Journal, 118, 114137.
Boardman, Anthony, Greenberg, David, Vining, Aidan & Weimer, David (2013). Cost-Benefit Analysis. Harlow: Pearson.
Bohm, Peter (1972). Estimating Demand for Public Goods: An Experiment. European Economic Review, 3(2), 111130.
Bohm, Peter (1978). I samhällets intresse? Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
Bohm, Peter, Bruzelius, Nils, Hesselborn, Per-Ove, Johannesson, Margareta, Ruud, Terje & Thedéen, Torbjörn (1974). Transportpolitiken och samhällsekonomin. Stockholm: Liber förlag.
Bohm, Peter & Hjort, Lars(1972). Stekenjokk, Swedish Ministry of Industry DsI 1972:5.
Borg, Per(2009). Den långsiktiga finansieringen – välfärdspolitikens klimatfråga? Stockholm, Sweden, Swedish Ministry of Finance, The Expert Group on Public Finance, ESO Report 2009:1.
Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas (2014). Experiences from the Swedish Value of Time study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 144158.
Börjesson, Maria, Eliasson, Jonas & Lundberg, Mattias (2014). Is CBA Ranking of Transport Investments Robust? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 48(2), 189204.
Börjesson, Maria, Fosgerau, Mogens & Algers, Staffan (2012). On the Income Elasticity of the Value of Travel Time. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(2), 368377.
Bruzelius, Nils (1979). The Value of Travel Time. Kent, UK: Croom Helm Ltd.
Bruzelius, Nils(1980). Samhällsekonomiska kostnads- intäktskalkyler: teori och tillämpning på investeringar i transportsektorn, Statens råd för byggnadsforskning R 97:1980.
Cummings, Ronald G., Harrison, Glenn W. & Rutstrom, Elisabet E. (1995). Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible? American Economic Review, 85(1), 260266.
Dixit, Avinash K. & Pindyck, Robert S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dorfman, Robert, Samuelson, Paul A. & Solow, Robert M. (1958). Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
DoT (2016). Benefit-Cost analysis (BCA) resource Guide. U.S. Department of Transport
Eckstein, Otto (1958). Water-Resources Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Eliasson, Jonas, Börjesson, Maria, Odeck, James & Welde, Morten (2015). Does Benefit–Cost Efficiency Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 49(3), 377396.
Eliasson, Jonas & Fosgerau, Mogens (2013). Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls – Deception or Selection? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 57, 105113.
Eliasson, Jonas & Lundberg, Mattias (2012). Do Cost-Benefit Analyses Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Experiences from the Swedish Transport Investment Plan 2010–2021. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 2948.
European Commission (2014). Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Brussels, Belgium, European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy.
Flam, Harry, Börjesson, Maria, Mörth, Ulrika & Nilsson, Jan-Eric (2016). Vart är vi på väg? Systemfel i transportpolitiken. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Bruzelius, Nils & Rothengatter, Werner (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Skamris Holm, Mette K. & Buhl, Søren L. (2004). What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? Transport Reviews, 24(1), 318.
Gollier, Christian (2008). Discounting with Fat-Tailed Economic Growth. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37, 171186.
Gollier, Christian(2011). On the under-estimation of the precautionary effect in discounting. CESifo Working Paper No. 3536.
Govt. Bill (1978). Swedish Government Bill, Proposition 1978/79:99.
Govt. Directive (1993). Government Directive, 1993:92.
Govt. Report (1958). Vägplan för Sverige, Swedish Government Reports, SOU 1958:1.
Hagen, Kåre P., Berntsen, Stein, Bye, Brita, Hultkrantz, Lars, Nyborg, Karine, Pedersen, Karl Rolf, Sandsmark, Maria, Volden, Gro Holst & Åvitsland, Geir(2012). Cost-Benefit Analysis, Official Norwegian Reports NOU 2012:16 (English version).
Halse, Askill(2017). Group Representation and Special Interests in Electoral Politics. PhD, Oslo University.
Hammitt, James K. & Robinson, Lisa A. (2011). The Income Elasticity of the Value per Statistical Life: Transferring Estimates between High and Low Income Populations. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(1), Article 1.
Hansson, Lars & Nilsson, Jan-Eric (1991). A New Swedish Railroad Policy: Separation of Infrastructure and Traffic Production. Transportation Research, 25, 153159.
Harrison, Glenn W. (2006). Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 125162.
Harrison, Glenn W. (2007). Making Choice Studies Incentive Compatible. In Kanninen, B. J. (Ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies (pp. 67110). Springer.
Harrison, Glenn W. & Rutstrom, Elisabet E. (2008). Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods. In Plott, C. & Smith, V. (Eds.), Handbook in Experimental Economics Results (pp. 752767). New York: Elsevier Science.
Harrison, Mark(2010). Valuing the future: the social discount rate in cost-benefit analysis. Visiting Research Paper April 2010. Australian Government. Productivity Commission.
HEATCO (2006). Deliverable 5 Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines. Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment Contract No. FP6-2002-SSP-1/502481.
Hensher, David A. (2010). Hypothetical Bias, Choice Experiments and Willingness to Pay. Transportation Research Part B, 44(6), 735752.
Hensher, D. A. & Truong, Truong P. (1985). Valuation of Travel Time Savings – A Direct Experimental Approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 19(3), 237261.
Hervik, Arild, Hagen, Kåre P., Nyborg, Karine, Scheel, Hans Henrik, Sletner, Inger-Johanne & Åvitsland, Geir(1997). Nytte-kostnadsanalyser Prinsipper for lønnsomhetsvurderinger i offentlig sektor, Norges offentlige utredninger NOU 1997:39.
Hultkrantz, Lars(2000). Beslutsunderlaget för Arlandabanan: en granskning av de samhällsekonomiska bedömningarna. Bilaga 1 till Nya vägar till vägar och järnvägar? Riksdagens revisorer, rapport 2000/01:5.
Hultkrantz, Lars(2016). Värdet av ett statistisk liv (VSL) (The Value of a Statistical Life), Report commissioned by the Swedish Transport Administration. Örebro University School of Business.
Hultkrantz, Lars, Krüger, Niclas A. & Mantalos, Panagiotis (2014). Risk Adjusted Social Rate of Discount for Transportation Investments. Research in Transportation Economics, 47, 7081.
Hultkrantz, Lars, Chuan-Zhong, Li & Lindberg, Gunnar(1996). Some problems in the consumer preference approach to multimodal transport planning. Dalarna University College, CTS Working Paper, 1996:5.
Hultkrantz, Lars, Lindberg, Gunnar & Nilsson, Jan-Eric (1997). Vad 1998 års trafikpolitik bör innehålla. Ekonomisk Debatt, 25(6), 343354.
Hultkrantz, Lars & Mortazavi, Reza (2001). Anomalies in the Value of Travel-Time Changes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 35(2), 285300.
Hultkrantz, Lars & Savsin, Selen(2017). Is Referencing a Remedy to Hypothetical Bias in Value of Time Elicitation? Evidence from Economic Experiments. Transportation (in press).
Hultkrantz, Lars & Svensson, Mikael (2012). The Value of a Statistical Life in Sweden: A review of the empirical literature. Health Policy, 108, 302310.
Jansson, Kjell(1995). Översyn av samhällsekonomiska kalkylvärden för den nationella trafikplaneringen 1994–1998. Statens institut för kommunikationsanalys, SIKA SAMPLAN 1995:13.
Johansson, Per-Olov (1987). The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, Kevin J., Adamowicz, Wiktor, Bennett, Jeff, Brouwer, Roy, Cameron, Trudy Ann, Michael Hanemann, W., Hanley, Nick, Ryan, Mandy, Scarpa, Riccardo, Tourangeau, Roger & Vossler, Christian A. (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319405.
Jones-Lee, Michael W., Hammerton, M. & Phillips, P. R. (1985). The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey. The Economic Journal, 95(377), 4972.
Jonsson, Ernst(1975). Olycksvärdering I trafikekonomiska kalkyler, Swedish Government Committe report SOU 1975:86, Appendix 2.
Jussila-Hammes, Johanna & Nilsson, Jan-Eric(2017). The Allocation of Transport Infrastructure in Swedish Municipalities: Welfare Maximization, Political Economy or Both? Mimeo, Dept. of Transport Economics, VTI.
Kopits, Elizabeth, McGartland, Al, Morgan, Cynthia, Pasurka, Carl, Shadbegian, Ron, Simon, Nathalie B., Simpson, David & Wolverton, Ann (2014). Retrospective Cost Analyses of EPA Regulations: A Case Study Approach. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 173193.
Kriström, Bengt & Bonta Bergman, Mona(2014). Samhällsekonomiska analyser av miljöprojekt – en vägledning, NATURVÅRDSVERKET RAPPORT 6628.
Krüger, Niclas A. (2012). To Kill a Real Option – Incomplete Contracts, Real Options and PPP. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 13591371.
Loomis, John (2011). What’s to Know About Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Studies? Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 363370.
Lundholm, Michael (2008). Decentralizing Public Goods Production. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10, 259279.
Mäler, Karl-Göran (1974). Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry. Washington DC, USA: Resources for the Future Library Collection.
Mantalos, Panagiotis & Hultkrantz, Lars(2018). Estimating “Gamma” for Tail-hedge Discount Rates When Project Returns Are Co-integrated with GDP. Applied Economics (in press).
Mattsson, Bengt & Thompson, Sture(1975). Vägtrafikolyckor och sjukvårdskostnader, Swedish Government Committe SOU 1975:13.
Mehra, Rajnish & Prescott, Edward (1985). The Equity Premium: A Puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145161.
Morgan, Cynthia, Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ron (2014). Ex Ante and Ex Post Cost Estimates of the Cluster Rule and MACT II Rule. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 195224.
Morgan, Cynthia & Simon, Nathalie B. (2014). National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for Arsenic: A Retrospective Assessment of Costs. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 259284.
Morgenstern, Richard. Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Federal Environmental Regulation. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. Published electronically November 10, 2017. doi:10.1017/bca.2017.17.
Murphy, James, Allen, Geoffrey P., Stevens, Thomas H. & Weatherhead, Darryl (2005). A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 30(3), 313325.
National Audit (1994). Infrastrukturinvesteringar – en kostnadsjämförelse mellan plan och utfall i 15 projekt inom Vägverket och Banverket, Riksrevisionsverket 1994:23.
Nerhagen, Lena & Forsstedt, Sara(2016). Regulating transport. The possible role of regulatory impact assessment in Swedish transport planning. Discussion Paper prepared for the Roundtable on Assessing regulatory changes in the transport sector (6–7 October 2016, Stockholm).
Nilsson, Jan-Eric (1991). Investment Decisions in a Public Bureaucracy – a Case Study of Swedish Road Planning Practices. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 25, 163175.
Nilsson, Jan-Eric(2000). Citytunneln; beslutsprocess och beslutsunderlag, Utredningsuppdrag för Riksdagens revisorer.
NOAA (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation 58. Federal Register 46.
OECD (2018). OECD Economic Surveys: Norway 2018. OECD Publishing.
Parliament Audit (2000). Nya vägar till vägar och järnvägar? Swedish Parliament Audit, Riksdagens revisorer; Rapport 2000/01:5.
Ramjerdi, Farideh, Flügel, Sefan, Samstad, Hanne & Killi, Marit(2010). Den norske verdsettingsstudien: Tid, Transportökonomisk institutt, Oslo, TØI rapport 1053B/2010.
Ramsey, Frank (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543559.
Sager, Tore Øivin (2016). Why Don’t Cost-Benefit Results Count for More? The Case of Norwegian Road Investment Priorities. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4(1), 101121.
SIKA (1999). Översyn av samhällsekonomiska metoder och kalkylvärden på transportområdet (Review of cost benefit calculation. Methods and valuations in the transport sector), SIKA Rapport 1999:6.
SIKA (2002). Översyn av samhällsekonomiska metoder och kalkylvärden på transportområdet (Review of cost benefit calculation. Methods and valuations in the transport sector), SIKA Rapport 2002:4.
SIKA (2008). Samhällsekonomiska principer och kalkylvärden för transportsektorn: ASEK 4, SIKA PM 2008:3.
Simpson, R. David (2014). Do Regulators Overestimate the Costs of Regulation? Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 315332.
Statens Vägverk (1981). Angelägenhetsbedömning av väg- och gatuobjekt. Statens vägverk, Planeringsavdelningen, P008, P009.
Statens vegvesen (2017). Håndbok V712 Konsekvensanalyser. Vegdirektoratet, Oslo, Norway.
Svensson, Mikael (2009). Precautionary Behavior and Willingness to Pay for a Mortality Risk Reduction: Searching for the Expected Relationship. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 6585.
Tarschys, Daniel(2002). Huru skall statsverket granskas? Riksdagen som arena för genomlysning och kontroll, Expertgruppen för Studier i Offentlig ekonomi (ESO), Ds 2002:58.
Trafikverket (2012). Bristanalys av transportsystemet fram till 2025 med tyngdpunkt på kapacitet och effektivitet, Trafikverket 2012:22.
Trafikverket (2015). Uppföljning av entreprenadkontrakt, Regeringsuppdrag.
Trafikverket (2016). Samhällsekonomisk kalkyl av höghastighetsjärnväg enligt Sverigeförhandlingen 2016-02-01, Trafikverket TRV 2014/54842.
U.K. HM Treasury (2013). Green Book Supplementary Guidance: Optimism Bias. Supplementary guidance to the Green Book on estimates for a project’s costs, benefits and duration in the absence of robust primary evidence.
Viscusi, W. K. & Masterman, Clayton J. (2017). Income Elasticities and Global Values of a Statistical Life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 8(2), 226250.
Wallström, Jenny & Söderqvist, Tore(2016). Kartläggning av samhällsekonomiska analyser inom miljöområdet. Stockholm Rapport 2016:1, Enveco.
Weitzman, Martin L.(2012). Rare disasters, Tail-hedged investments, risk-adjusted discount rates. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18496.
Weitzman, Martin L. (2013). Tail-Hedge Discounting and the Social Cost of Carbon. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 873882.
Wolverton, Ann (2014). Retrospective Evaluation of Costs Associated with Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemptions for Open Field Strawberries in California. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(2), 225257.


Economic Analysis and Investment Priorities in Sweden’s Transport Sector

  • Henrik Andersson (a1), Lars Hultkrantz (a2), Gunnar Lindberg (a3) and Jan-Eric Nilsson (a4) (a5)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed