Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:17:11.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modes of Thinking and Modes of Discourse in the Sung: Some Thoughts on the Yü-lu (“Recorded Conversations”) Texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Daniel K. Gardner
Get access

Extract

In studying the ideas of Sung Neo-Confucians, scholars have made much use of the so-called yü-lu texts, or “records of conversations.” Disciples, sitting in the presence of their master, would record his exchanges with them; less frequently they would jot them down later from memory. The ideas of many of the foremost thinkers of the Sung dynasty (960–1279) are better known to us as a result of the stenographic efforts of their disciples: the teachings of Chang Tsai (1020–1077), Cheng I (1032–1107), Cheng Hao (1032–1085), Hsieh Liang-tso (1050–1103), Yang Shih (1053–1135), Lu Hsiang-shan (1139–1193), and Chu Hsi (1130–1200), to name but a few, were transmitted to later generations in yü-lu, recorded and edited by devoted followers.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , August 1991 , pp. 574 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Berling, Judith. 1987. “Bringing the Buddha Down to Earth: Notes on the Emergence of Yü-lu as a Buddhist Genre.” History of Religions 27:56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltz, Judith. 1987. A Survey of Taoist Literature, Tenth to Seventeenth Centuries, Berkeley: Institute of Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963. Instructions for Practical Living. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963a. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Tsai. 1978. Chang Tsai chi [Collected literary works of Chang Tsai]. Peking: Chung-hua shu-chü.Google Scholar
Ch'ao, Kung-wu. 1151. Chao-te hsien-sheng chün-chai tu-shu chih [Record of reading at the Chün studio by Master Chao-te]. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.Google Scholar
Ch'eng, Hao and Ch'eng, I. Ho-nan Ch'eng-shih i-shu [Surviving works of Messrs. Ch'eng of Honan]. Kuo-hsüeh chi-pen ts'ung-shu.Google Scholar
Chou i [Book of changes]. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supplement no. 10.Google Scholar
Chu, Hsi. 1880. Chu-tzu yü-lei [Conversations of Master Chu, arranged topically]. Ch'uan ching t'ang ed.Google Scholar
Chu, Hsi. Hui-an hsien-sheng Chu Wen-kung wen-chi [Collected literary works of Master Chu]. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.Google Scholar
CTYL. See Chu Hsi 1880.Google Scholar
Dan, Joseph. 1986. “Midrash and the Dawn of Kabbalah.” In Midrash and Literature, ed. by Hartman, Geoffrey H. and Budick, Sanford, pp. 127–39. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Bary, Wm. Theodore, ed. 1964. Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Ronald C. 1989. “Ou-yang Hsiu and Su Shih on Calligraphy.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 49.2:365–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Ronald C. 1984. The Literary Works of Ou-yang Hsiu (1007–1072). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Benjamin. 1984. From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1972. Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta-hsueh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gardner, Daniel K. 1990. Learning to Be a Sage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1958. Two Chinese Philosophers: Ch'eng Ming-tao and Ch'eng Yich'uan. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
Han, Yü. Chu Wen-kung chiao Ch'ang-li hsien-sheng wen-chi [Collected literary works of Han Yü, edited by Hsi], Chu. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.Google Scholar
Hartman, Charles. 1986. Han Yü and the T'ang Search for Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. 1986. “The Nature of the Aggadah.” In Midrash and Literature, ed. by Hartman, Geoffrey H. and Budick, Sanford, pp. 41–55. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Liang-tso, Hsieh. 1985. Shang-ts'ai yü-lu [Recorded conversations of Hsieh Liangtso]. Ts'ung-shu chi-ch'eng hsin-pien, vol. 22. Taipei: Hsin wen-feng.Google Scholar
l-shu. See Ch'eng Hao and Ch'eng I.Google Scholar
Yasuji, Ichikawa. 1959. “Shushi gorui zakki” [Miscellaneous notes on the “Conversations of Master Chu, arranged topically”]. Jinbun kagakuka kiyō 21: 137–84.Google Scholar
Kasoff, Ira. 1984. The Thought of Chang Tsai (1020–1077). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. 1989. Medieval Civilization, 400–1500. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Li chi [Book of rites]. 1815. Shih-san ching chu-shu ed.Google Scholar
Lun-yü [Analects]. 1815. Shih-san ching chu-shu ed.Google Scholar
Lun-yü [Analects]. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supplement no. 16.Google Scholar
Lun-yü chi-chu [Collected commentaries on the Analects]. In Ssu-shu chi-chu [Collected commentaries on the Four Books]. Ssu-pu pei-yao.Google Scholar
Maspero, Henri. 1914. “Sur Quelques Textes Anciens de Chinois Parlé.” Bulletin de l'Ecole Française d'Extrême-Orient 14:1–36.Google Scholar
Meng-tzu [Book of Mencius]. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supplement no. 17.Google Scholar
Nienhauser, William H. Jr., ed. 1986. The Indiana Companion to Traditional Chinese Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hsiu, Ou-Yang. Ou-yang Wen-chung-kung wen-chi [Collected literary works of Ouyang Hsiu]. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.Google Scholar
Hsi-jui, P'i. 1974. Ching-hsüeh li-shih [History of classical studies]. Reprint, Taipei: Ho-lo t'u-shu ch'u-pan she.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ya-chih, Shen. Shen Hsia-hsien chi [Collected literary works of Shen Ya-chih]. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.Google Scholar
Ta-hsüeh chang-chü [Greater Learning in chapters and verse]. In Ssu-shu chi-chu [Collected commentaries on the Four Books]. Ssu-pu pei-yao.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Seizan. 1983. “‘The Recorded Sayings” Texts of Chinese Ch'an Buddhism.” In Lai, Whalen and Lancaster, Lewis R., eds., Early Ch'an in China and Tibet, pp. 185–205. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Yampolsky, Philip, trans. 1967. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Kojiro. 1967. An Introduction to Sung Poetry. Trans. Watson, Burton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chün-fang, Yü. 1981. The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu-hung and the Late Ming Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar