Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T10:28:29.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing the Japanese Ethnography of Modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Miriam Silverberg
Get access

Extract

One afternoon in tokyo in the summer of 1921, ten Waseda University students visited the home of Gonda Yasunosuke, the critic of Japanese popular culture. Each was writing a dissertation on popular entertainment (minsbū goraku). Tell us, they asked Gonda, what were the authoritative texts they could find at Maruzen, the emporium specializing in foreign books? They wanted the real thing—Western language theoretical sources. “Forget it,” replied Gonda, “there aren't any in the Maruzen catalog. Go to Asakusa—Asakusa's your text.” The young men wanted an imported, printed master text, but Gonda would not comply. Instead, he demanded personal experience that would give them an understanding of cultural forms that a reading of printed texts (and, moreover, of imported printed texts) could not yield. He directed them to do on-site fieldwork in Asakusa Park where female and male laborers from large- and small-scale industries, artisans, and white-collar middleclass nouveaux riches mingled to play (Gonda 1922a [GYS 1:291–92]).

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 30 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Arjun, Appadurai, ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephen, Bann, ed. 1974. The Tradition of Constructivism. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Stephanie, Barron, and Tuchman, Maurice, eds. 1980. The Avant-Garde in Russia: 1910-1930. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. 1983. “A Thousand and One Troubles: Blackpool Pleasure Beach.”In Formations, Formations of Pleasure issue. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Malcolm, and Mcfarlane, James. 1976. Modernism 1890-1930. Sussex, Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendall, Steven F.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dower, John. 1986. War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Elliott, David. 1986. New Worlds: Russian Art and Society 1900-1937. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Fujimori, Terunobu. 1983. “Kon Wajirō to Barakku sōshokusha: shinsai fukkōki no kenchiku” [Kon Wajirō and the Barrack Decorating Society]. Karamu. April, No. 88 :59–64.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon. 1987. The State and Labor in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, Carol. 1985. Japan'n Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1921a. “Minshū no goraku seikatsu ni arawaretaru kokuminseijō” [The national character appearing in popular play practices]. GYS IV:33–39 [Kaibo 4/21].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1921b. “Postaa no ku: Asakusa no minshu goraku” [Crossroads of posters: the popular play of Asakusa]. GYS 1:268–78 [Daikan 4/21].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke 1922a. Minshū goraku no kichō [The foundations of popular play]. Tokyo: Dōjinsha shoten. GYS 1:289–403.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1922b. “Shihonshugi shakai to ryūkō” [Capitalism and fads]. GYS IV: 57–67 [Kaibō 7/22].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke 1922c. “Ginbura to Dōbura. san to jōshū” [Ginbura and Dōbura. The mood in three cities]. GYS IV:68–71 [Chūgai shōgyō shinpō 8/11/23].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1923a. Gorakugyōsha no mure [The gatherings of popular entertainers]. Tokyo: Jitsugyō no nipponsha.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1923b. “Seinen goraku no suii to gendai seinen goraku no tokuchō” [The transition in the play of youth and the characteristics of the play of modera youth]. GYS IV:83–97 (Shinseinen 1/23).Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1923c. “Minshū goraku” [Popular play]. GYS IV:72–82 [Chūgai shōgyōshinpō 1/23].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1923d. “Eiga setsumei no shinka to setsumei geijutsu no tanjō” [The advance of movie explication and the birth of the art of explication]. GYS IV: 119–29 [Ōshima Hideo, 8/23].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1924a. “Fukkō no miyako wo nagamete” [Looking at the reemerging capital]. GYS IV: 130–46 [Cbūgai shōgyō shimpō l/l 1-1/18/24].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1924b. “Shakai seikatsu ni okeru goraku no ichikōsatsu” [One examination of popular play in social practice] originally published in the Ōhara shakai mondai kenkyūjo zasshi, 1924, and republished as “shakai seikatsu to minshugoraku” [Social practice and popular play]. GYS II:183–254.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1928. “Katei ni okeru goraku” [Play in the household]. GYS IV: 161–68 [Seikatsu 12/28].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke 1929. “Gendai no goraku ni arawareta jidaisō” [Aspects of the era appearing in the play of the present]. GYS IV: 169–73 [Yomiuri Shimbun 5/17/29].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1930. “Gorakuchi ‘Asakusa’ no kenkyū” [A study of “Asakusa,” the site of play]. GYS IV: 174–230 [Ōhara shakai mondai kenkyūjo zasshi 3/30].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1931. Minshūgorakuron [On popular play]. Tokyo: Ganshōdōshoten.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1933. “Rodosha gorakuron” [On workers play]. GYS IV:255–80 [Ōhara thakai mondai kenkyūjo zasshi 11/33].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke 1935. “Minshū goraku no hakai to kokumin goraku e no junbi” [The destruction of popular play and the preparation for national play]. GYS III: 15–25 [Chūō kōron 5/35].Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1941. Kokumin goraku no mondai [The problem of national play]. Tokyo: Kurita shoten. GYS III:5–225.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1942a. Nachisu Kōseidan [The Nazi Society for Strength Through Joy Group]. Tokyo: Kurita shoten.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1942b. “Kdf to so no hoken jigyō” [The KDF and its health policies]. Onsen 6/42.Google Scholar
Gonda, Yasunosuke. 1942c. “Kokumin kōseiundō no nachisuteki seikaku” [The Nazi characteristics of the National Welfare Movement].Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harootunian, H. D. 1988. Things Seen and Unseen: Discourse and Ideology in Tokugawa Nativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huyssen, Andreas. 1986. After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano, Masanao. 1974. Taishō demokurashii no teirytū [The undercurrents of Taishō democracy]. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Kasza, Gregory. 1988. The State and the Mass Media in Japan, 1918-1945. Berkeley: University of California Press..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawazoe, Noboru. 1987. Kon Wajirō: Sono kōgengaku [Kon Wajirō: his modernology]. Tokyo: Ribu ripooto.Google Scholar
Kindai no chōkoku [Overcoming Modernity]. 1943. Tokyo: Sōgensha.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1925. “Tokyo Ginzagai fuzoku kiroku” [Record of mores on Tokyo Ginza Boulevard]. Kon 1930b; KWS 1:53-108 (Fujin kōron 7/25 as “Sen kyuhyakunijugonen natsu Tokyo Ginza gai fuzoku kiroku [Record of mores on Tokyo Ginza boulevard in the Summer of 1925]).Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō 1925b. “Honjo-Fukagawa himminkutsu fukin fūzoku saishū” [Collection of mores in the area of the Honjo-Fukagawa slum]. In Kon 1930b and KWS 1:109–33 (Fujin kōron 12/25).Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1926. “Inokashira Kōen Haru no pikunikku” [Picnic in Inokashira Park in the Spring]. In Kon 1930b and KWS 1:291–94.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1926b. “Shinkatei no shinamono chōsa” [Survey of items in a new household]. 1930b and KWS 1:345–66.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1927. “Inakaya no kōzō bi” [The beauty of the construction of the rural. house]. KWS IX:26l–64 (Minzoku to kenchiku 2/27).Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1927b. “Inokashira koen jisatsu bashō bunpuzu” [Mapping of suicide sites in Inokashira park]. In Kon 1930b and KWS 1:295–301.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1928. “Gendai fuzoku” [Modern Mores]. In Nihon fūzokushi kōza [Lectures in the history of Japanese customs]. Nos. 10, 18. Tokyo: Yusankaku. In modified form as “Kogengaku to wa nanika” [What is Modernology?] in KWS 1:13–23.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1928b. “Depaato fuzoku shakaigaku” [The sociology of department store mores]. Kon 1930b and KWS 1:227–43.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1930a. “Kogengaku to wa nanika” [What is Modernology?] in KWS I and Kon 1930b.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō and Kenkichi, Yoshida, eds. 1930b. Modernologio (Kōgengaku) [Modernology]. Tokyo: Shunyōdō.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō.1931. Kōgengaku saishū (Modernologio) [Modernology collections]. Tokyo: Kensetsusha.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1931a. “Kōgengaku sōron” [General remarks on Modernology]. KWS I: 24–49.Google Scholar
Kon, Wajirō. 1944. “Nihonbi no saininshiki” [A reassessment of Japanese beauty]. Shūlkan Asahi 10/19/41.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1976. The Survival of Capitalism: Reproduction of the Relations of Production. Trans. Bryant, Frank. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Maravall, Jose Antonio. 1986. Culture of the Baroque: Analysis of a Historical Structure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, and Fischer, Michael M. J.. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1967. Capital. 3 vols, ed. Engels, Frederick. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Minami, ed. 1982. Nihon modanizumu no kenkyū [Studies in Japanese modernism]. Tokyo: Bureen shuppan.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Minami. 1987. Shōwa bunka [Showa culture]. Tokyo: Keisō shobō.Google Scholar
Modan seikatsu mandankai. 1928. [A chat about modern life]. Shinchō (January): 123–47.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Satya. 1989. “Us and Them: On the Philosophical Bases of Political Criticism.” Yale Journal of Criticism 2, no. 2:1–31.Google Scholar
Tomoyoshi, Murayama. 1924. Genzai no geijutsu to mirai no geijutsu [Art of the present and art of the future]. Tokyo: Ōbundō.Google Scholar
Tomoyoshi, Murayama, ed. Mavo 1924–25.Google Scholar
Tomoyoshi, Murayama 1926. Kōseiha kenkyū [Studies of the Constructivists]. Tokyo: Chūō bijutsusha.Google Scholar
Tomoyoshi, Murayama. 1930a. Nihon puroretaria engekiron [On Japanese proletarian theatre]. Tokyo: Tenjinsha.Google Scholar
Tomoyoshi, Murayama. 1930b. Puroretaria bijutsu no tame ni [For the sake of proletarian art]. Tokyo: Atoriesha.Google Scholar
Najita, Tetsuo, and Harootunian, H. D.. 1988. “Japanese Revolt Against the West: Political and Cultural Criticism in the Twentieth Century.” In Hall, John W. et al., eds., The Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 6, Peter Duus,. ed., The Twentieth Century, pp. 771–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orlove, Benjamin, and Rutz, Henry. 1989. The Social Economy of Consumption. Society for Economic Anthropology: Monographs in Economic Anthropology. Vol. 6. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.Google Scholar
ŌYa, SōIchi. 1929. “Modan sō to modan sō.” [Modern social strata and modern mores]. Chūō kōron (February). In Ōya Sōichi zenshū, vol. 2. Tokyo: Soyosha, 1980-82.Google Scholar
ŌYa, SōIchi. 1930. Modan sō to modan sō. [Modern social strata and modern mores}. In Ōya Sōichi zenshū, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Powers, Richard Gid, and Hidetoshi, Kato, eds. 1989. Handbook of Japanese Popular Culture. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Donald, Roden. “Taishō Culture and the Problem of Gender Ambivalence.”In Rimer, J. Thomas, ed., Culture and Identity: Japanese Intellectuals During the Interwar Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jay. 1984. Injurious to Public Morals: Writers and the Meiji State. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward. 1983. Low City, High City: Tokyo from Edo to the Earthquake: How the Shogun's Capital became a Great Modern City, 1867-1923 New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward. 1990. Tokyo Rising: The City Since the Great Earthquake. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Miriam. 1986. “Living on the Urban Edge: Culture and Subculture in Taisho Japan.” Unpublished paper presented at the Association for Asian Studies, March 1986.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Miriam. 1990. Changing Song: The Marxist Manifestos of Nakano Shigeharu. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Miriam. 1991. “The Modern Girl as Militant.” In Bernstein, Gail, ed., Recreating Japanese Women, 1600-1945. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 239–66.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Miriam. 1988. “Advertising Every Body: Images from the Japanese Modern Years.”Illustrated paper presented at Cornell University workshop, “Constructions of the Body in Japan.” May 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry D. 1978. “Tokyo as an Idea: An Exploration of Japanese Urban Thought until 1945.” Journal of Japanese Studies 4:45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tada, Michitarō. 1985. “Japanese Sensibility: An ‘Imitation’ of Yanagita.” In Koschmann, J. Victor, Keibō, ŌIwa, and Shinji, Yamashita, eds., International Perspectives on Yanagita Kunio and Japanese Folklore Studies. Ithaca: Cornell University East Asia Papers, no. 37:97–120.Google Scholar
The 1920's in Japan: 1920 nendai nihonten. 1988. Edited and copyright by Tokyo Metropolitan Art Museum, Yamaguchi Prefectural Museum of Art, Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Modern Art, and the Asahi Shimbun.Google Scholar
Tsurumi, Shunsuke. 1976. “Minshu goraku kara kokumin goraku e.” In Shisō 624 (June):278–88.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Tsuneo. 1972. Kindai nihon toshi kyōkashi kenkyū. Reimei shobō.,Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1989. The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar