Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:25:46.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Owen Lattimore, Asia, and Comparative History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2007

William T. Rowe
Get access

Abstract

Perhaps best known today as a pioneering scholar of Inner Asia and a victim of the McCarthy witch hunts of the 1950s, Owen Lattimore was more basically, like his friend Arnold Toynbee, a major player in the vogue of comparative history that captured wide public attention in the second quarter of the twentieth century. His lifelong intellectual project was to develop a “scientific” model of the way human societies form, evolve, grow, decline, mutate, and interact with one another along “frontiers.” In the process of working out this model, Lattimore appropriated for his own purposes, and often later discarded, some of the analytic devices most popular in his day, including ecological determinism, biological racism, economic geography and location theory, and Marxist modes of production. At every stage in his thinking, he sought to confound complacent teleologies, both those of Western “progress” and those of Chinese “civilization” of its pastoralist neighbors.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 759 - 786
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Atwood, Christopher P. 2002. Young Mongols and Vigilantes in Inner Mongolia's Interregnum Decades, 1911–1931. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Banton, Michael. 1980. “The Idiom of Race: A Critique of Presentism.” Research in Race and Ethnic Relations 2: 21–42.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the Two World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Carl Whiting. 1922. “The Geographical Factor in the Development of Chinese Civilization.” Geographical Review 12 (1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 1966. French Rural History: An Essay on Its Basic Characteristics. Trans. Sondheimer, Janet. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Originally published as Caractères originaux de l'histoire française (Oslo, 1931).Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1940. Race, Language, and Culture. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bowman, Isaiah. 1928. The New World: Problems in Political Geography. 4th ed.Yonkers, N.Y.: World Book.Google Scholar
Bunzl, Matti. 1996. “Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition.” In Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, ed. Stocking, George Jr., 17–78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Chi, Ch'ao-ting. 1936. Key Economic Areas in Chinese History, as Revealed in the Development of Public Works for Water-Control. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon. 1936. Man Makes Himself. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon. 1951. Social Evolution. Cleveland: Meridan.Google Scholar
Chow, Tse-tsung. 1960. The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual Revolution in Modern China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 1999. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, Nicola. 2002. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Role of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degler, Carl N. 1989. “Culture vs. Biology in the Thought of Franz Boas and Alfred L. Kroeber.” German Historical Institute, Annual Lecture Series No. 2. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Dikötter, Frank. 1989. “Eugenics in Republican China.” Republican China 15 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Ronald B. 1923. The Racial History of Man. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2003. Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Eberhard, Wolfram. 1950. A History of China. Trans. Dickes, E. W. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Originally published as Chinas Gechichte (Bern: A. Francke, 1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, Wolfram. 1952. Conquerors and Rulers: Social Forces in Medieval China. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark C. 2001. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien. 1925. A Geographical Introduction to History. Trans. Mountford, E. G. and Paxton, J. H.. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien. 1973. “Civilisation: Evolution of a Word and Group of Ideas.” In A New Kind of History: From the Writings of Febvre, ed. Burke, Peter, trans. Folca, K219–57. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fogel, Joshua A. 1984. Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naitō Konan (1866–1934). Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gaubatz, Piper Rae. 1996. Beyond the Great Wall: Urban From and Transformation on the Chinese Frontiers. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grew, Raymond. 1980. “The Case for Comparing Histories.” American Historical Review 85 (4): 763–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 2001. “Owen Lattimore: A Memoire.” In Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, by Harvey, David, 90–107. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herzstein, Robert E. 2005. Henry R. Luce, Time, and the American Crusade in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higham, John. 1988. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. 2nd ed.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. Social Darwinism in American Thought. Rev. ed.Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Ellsworth. 1907. The Pulse of Asia: A Journey in Central Asia Illustrating the Geographic Basis of History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Huntington, Ellsworth. 1924a. The Character of Races, as Influenced by Physical Environment, Natural Selection, and Historical Development. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, ellsworth. 1924b. Civilization and Climate. 3rd ed.New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. 1997. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Hanover, N.H.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold A. 1930. The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Institute of Pacific Relations. 1938. Agrarian China: Selected Source Materials from Chinese Authors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
James, Preston E. 1972. All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Ideas. Indianapolis, Ind.: Odyssey Press.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1928. “Caravan Routes of Inner Asia.” Geographical Journal 72 (6): 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1929. The Desert Road to Turkestan. Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1995.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1930. High Tartary. Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1994.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1932. Manchuria: Cradle of Conflict. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1935. “On the Wickedness of Being Nomads.” In Studies in Frontier History: Collected Papers, 1928–1958, by Lattimore, Owen, 415–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1936. “Land and Sea in the Destiny of Japan.” Public Affairs 9 (4): 586–89.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1937. “The Mainsprings of Asiatic Migration.” In Limits of Land Settlement: A Report on Present-Day Possibilities, ed. Bowman, Isaiah, 119–35. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1938. “The Geographical Factor in Mongol History.” Geographical Journal 91 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1943. “Yunnan, Pivot of Southeast Asia.” Foreign Affairs 21 (3): 476–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1947. “Inner Asian Frontiers: Chinese and Russian Margins of Expansion.” Journal of Economic History 7 (1): 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1948. “Spengler and Toynbee.” Atlantic Monthly, April, 104–5.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1950a. Ordeal by Slander. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1950b. Pivot of Asia: Sinkiang and the Inner Asian Frontiers of China and Russia. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1957. “Review of Feudalism in History.” Past and Present, no. 12: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1960. “The Industrial Impact on China, 1800–1950.” In First International Conference on Economic History: Contributions, 103–13. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1962a. “La Civilisation, mère de barbarie?” [Civilization: Mother of Barbarism?] Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 17: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1962b. Studies in Frontier History: Collected Papers, 1928–1958. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. 1988. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: Oxford University Press. Originally published New York: American Geographical Society, 1940.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen and Eleanor, Lattimore. 1947. China: A Short History. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lee, Robert H. G. 1970. The Manchurian Frontier in Ch'ing History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. C. 1935. “Review of The Mongols of Manchuria, by Owen Lattimore.” Nankai Social and Economic Quarterly 8 (1): 188–91.Google Scholar
Lösch, August. 1938. “The Nature of Economic Regions.” Southern Economic Journal 5 (1): 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lowdermilk, W. O. 1935. “Man-Made Deserts.” Pacific Affairs 8 (4): 409–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, William H. 1983. The Great Frontier: Freedom and Hierarchy in Modern Times. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. 1989. Arnold J. Toynbee: A Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meisner, Maurice. 1967. Li Ta-chao and the Origins of Chinese Marxism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Robert P. 1992. Owen Lattimore and the “Loss” of China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert Ezra. 1936. “Human Ecology.” American Journal of Sociology 42 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Roy Harvey. 1953. The Savages of America: A Study of the Indian and the Idea of Civilization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pierpont, Claudia Roth. 2004. “The Measure of America.” New Yorker, March 8, 48–63.Google Scholar
Pusey, James Reeve. 1983. China and Charles Darwin. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rossabi, Morris. 1975. China and Inner Asia: From 1368 to the Present Day. New York: Pica Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, William T. 1985. “Approaches to Modern Chinese Social History.” In Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History, ed. Zunz, Olivier, 236–96. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1954. “A Marxist Controversy on China.” Far Eastern Quarterly 13 (2): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1969. In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1967. “Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History.” History and Theory 6 (2): 208–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G. William. 1964–65. “Marketing and Social Structure in China.” Pts. 1 and 2. Journal of Asian Studies 24 (1): 3–43; 24 (2): 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G. William. 1977. “Cities and the Hierarchy of Local Systems.” In The City in Late Imperial China, ed. William Skinner, G, 275–352. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Spengler, Oswald. 1926–28. The Decline of the West. 2 vols. Trans. Atkinson, C. F. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. 1979. “The Revival of Narrative: Reflections on a New Old History.” Past and Present, no 85: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teggart, Frederick J. 1939. Rome and China: A Study of Correlations in Historical Events. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold J. 1934–39. A Study of History. 6 vols. 2nd ed.London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ulmen, G. L. 1978. The Science of Society: Toward an Understanding of the Life and Work of Karl August Wittfogel. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Webb, Walter Prescott. 1931. The Great Plains. Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Webb, Walter Prescott. 1952. The Great Frontier. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
White, Richard. 1985. “American Environmental History: The Development of a New Historical Field.” Pacific Historical Review 54 (3): 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigan, Kären. 1992. “The Geographical Imagination in Early Modern Japanese History: Retrospect and Prospect.” Journal of Asian Studies 51 (1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl August. 1931. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas [Chinese Economy and Society]. Leipzig: C. L. Hirschfeld.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl August. 1935. “The Stages of Development in Chinese Economic and Social History.” In The Asiatic Mode of Production: Science and Politics, ed. Bailey, Anne M and Llobera, Josep R, 113–40. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl August. 1938. “The Theory of Oriental Society.” In The Asiatic Mode of Production: Science and Politics, ed. Bailey, Anne M. and Llobera, Josep R., 141–57. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl August. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1994. “Perilous Ideas: Race, Cultures, Peoples.” Current Anthropology 35 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar