Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T22:58:25.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probability bounds on the finite sum of the binary sequence of order k

Part of: Combinatorial probability Stochastic processes Distribution theory Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Sunil K. Dhar  and
Xulun Jiang
Sunil K. Dhar*
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Xulun Jiang*
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
*
∗Postal address: Center for Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Department of Mathematics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
∗Postal address: Center for Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Department of Mathematics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cumulative distribution of the finite sum of the binary sequence of order k is studied and some of its applications discussed. Certain properties of this sequence are investigated and uniformly superior bounds for the cumulative distribution under minimal information on the ‘success' probabilities are derived.

Keywords

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONINDEPENDENCE

MSC classification

Primary: 60C05: Combinatorial probability
Secondary: 60G55: Point processes 60K05: Renewal theory 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.) 62E15: Exact distribution theory
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 1014 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abul-Ela, A. A., Greenberg, B. G. and Horvitz, D. G. (1967) A multi-proportions randomized response model. ASA J September, 990–1008.Google Scholar
Aki, S. (1985) Discrete distributions of order k on a binary sequence. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 37, 205–224.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W. and Samuels, S. M. (1965) Some inequalities among binomial and Poisson probabilities. Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. L. and Le Cam, L. (1960) The Poisson approximation to the Poisson binomial distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 3, 737–740.Google Scholar
Hoeffding, W. (1956) On the distribution of the number of successes in independent trials. Ann. Math. Statist. 27, 713–721.Google Scholar
Gastwirth, J. L. (1977) A probability model of a pyramid scheme. Amer. Statistician 31, 79–82.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1956) Two uniform limit theorems for sums of independent random variables. Theory Prob. Appl. 1, 384–394.Google Scholar
Kuk, A. Y. C. (1990) Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrics 77, 436–438.Google Scholar
Percus, O. E. and Percus, J. K. (1985) Probability bounds on the sum of independent nonidentically distributed binomial random variables. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 45, 621–640.Google Scholar
Warner, S. L. (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. ASA J. March, 63–69.Google Scholar