Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:48:13.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield stability of soybean cultivars in response to sowing date in the lower latitude Brazilian Savannah Highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

C. R. SPEHAR ,
E. R. FRANCISCO  and
E. A. PEREIRA
C. R. SPEHAR*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil
E. R. FRANCISCO
Affiliation:
Agronomy, Federal University of Tocantins, Campus Gurupi, C. Postal 66 Gurupi, TO 77402-970, Brazil
E. A. PEREIRA
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: spehar@unb.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Acquisition of high-yielding stable cultivars, a major target for breeding, is achievable by repeated trials across different locations and seasons. The hypothesis is whether evaluation of sowing date and season could be used to assess yield stability for tropical soybean, a photoperiod-sensitive plant. Determinate growth cultivars BRSOY-1, BRSOY-2, BRSOY-3, BRSOY-4, BRSOY-5, BRSOY-6, BRSOY-7, BRSOY-8 and BRSOY-9, of early, mid-cycle and late maturity, were tested at six sowing dates in three growing seasons (2005–2008), in Planaltina, DF Brazil. Data on degree days to first flower and physiological maturity, plant and first pod height, and grain yield were analysed. BRSOY-3, BRSOY-5 and BRSOY-7 were the most stable, measured across 18 environments (year×sowing date), demonstrating selection effectiveness. Determinate growth explained low yields in late-sown treatments, as the photoperiod response reduced the reproductive phase. Late cultivars had photoperiod effect confounded with dry spells at the end of the rainy season. Genotypic stability for high yield in soybean is envisaged as a function of maturity group and long reproductive period. Manipulating the response to maturity and introduction of indeterminate growth habit is expected to increase yields across the sowing period, consolidating tropical soybean production. The method could be used for cultivar release and to define selection schemes aiming at recombinants for delayed maturity.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 6 , August 2015 , pp. 1059 - 1068
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barros, H. B., Peluzio, J. M., dos Santos, M. M., Brito, E. L. & de Almeida, R. D. (2003). Effect of sowing dates on the performance of soybean cultivars in Southern Tocantins, Brazil. Revista Ceres 50, 565–572.Google Scholar
Bonato, E. R. & Vello, N. A. (1999). Genetic aspects of the time to flowering in natural variants of soybean. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 34, 989–993.Google Scholar
Bonato, E. R., Bertagnolli, P. F., Ignaczak, J. C., Tragnago, J. L. & Rubin, S. de A. L. (1998). Performance of soybean cultivars in three sowing dates in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 33, 879–884.Google Scholar
Braccini, A. L., Motta, I. S., Scapim, C. A., Braccini, M. C. L., Ávila, M. R. & Meschede, D. K. (2004). Agronomic traits and seed parameters of soybean cultivars as affected by delayed sowings. Bragantia 63, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, H. A. (2009). Survey of factors involved in crop maturity. Agronomy Journal 101, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpentieri-Pipolo, V., Almeida, L. A., Kiihl, R. A. S. & Rosolem, C. A. (2000). Inheritance of long juvenile period under short day conditions for the BR80-6778 soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) line. Euphytica 112, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Wu, C., Xu, J., Zhu, H., Leng, J., Bai, Y., Guan, R., Hou, W., Zhang, L. & Han, T. (2011). Genetic analysis and QTL detection of reproductive period and post-flowering photoperiod response in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destro, D., Sediyama, T., Silva, J. C., Sediyama, C. S. & Thiébaut, J. T. L. (1987). Heritability estimates for some characters in two soybean crosses. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 22, 291–304.Google Scholar
Egli, D. E. (2010). Soybean yield physiology: principles and processes of yield production. In The Soybean: Botany, Production and Uses (Ed. Singh, G.), pp. 113–141. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R. & Caviness, C. E. (1977). Stages of Soybean Development. Special Report no. 80. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Hartwig, E. E. & Kiihl, R. A. S. (1979). Identification and utilization of a delayed flowering character in soybeans for short-day conditions. Field Crops Research 2, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiffig, L. S., Câmara, G. M. S., Marques, L. A., Pedroso, D. P. & Piedade, S. M. S. (2006). Closed canopy and leaf area index of soybean in different space arrangements. Bragantia 65, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiromoto, D. M. & Vello, N. A. (1986). The genetic base of Brazilian soybean [(Glycine max L. (Merrill)] cultivars. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 9, 295–306.Google Scholar
Jones, B. & Nachtsheim, C. J. (2009). Split-plot designs: What, why and how. Journal of Quality Technology 41, 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantolic, A. G. & Slafer, G. A. (2001). Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in indeterminate soybean cultivars. Field Crops Research 72, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiihl, R. A. S. & Garcia, A. (1989). The use of long-juvenile trait in breeding soybean cultivars. In Conferencia Mundial de Investigación en Soja, Proceedings of the 4th Soybean World Research Conference, 5–9 March, 1989 (Ed. Pascale, A. J.), pp. 994–1000. Buenos Aires: AASOJA.Google Scholar
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolph, B. & Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, M. C., Hamawaki, O. T., Sediyama, T., Bueno, M. R., Reis, M. S., Cruz, C. D. & Nogueira, A. P. O. (2011). Adaptability and stability of soybean genotypes under different times of sowing. Bioscience Journal 27, 59–69.Google Scholar
Miranda, Z. F. S., Arias, C. A. A., Prete, C. E. C., Kiihl, R. A. S., Almeida, L. A., Toledo, J. F. F. & Destro, D. (2007). Genetic characterization of ninety elite soybean cultivars using coefficient of parentage. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42, 363–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, F. C., Neves, J. C. L., Novais, R. F., Alvarez, V. H. & Sediyama, C. S. (2008). Modeling lime and fertilizer recommendations for soybean. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 32, 1661–1674.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc (1997). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. Washington, DC: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Spehar, C. R. (1995). Impact of strategic genes in soybean on agricultural development in the Brazilian tropical savannahs. Field Crops Research 41, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spehar, C. R. & Souza, L. A. C. (2006). Selection for aluminium tolerance in tropical soybeans. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 36, 1–6.Google Scholar
Spehar, C. R. & Trecenti, R. (2011). Agronomic performance of traditional and innovative species for double and dry season copping in the Brazilian Savannah high lands. Bioscience Journal 27, 102–111.Google Scholar
Spehar, C. R., Pereira, E. A. & Souza, L. A. C. (2011). Legume improvement in acid and less fertile soils. In Biology and Breeding of Food Legumes (Eds Pratap, A. & Kumar, J.), pp. 262–275. New Delhi: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Martin, S. K., Xie, F., Zhang, H., Zhang, W. & Song, X. (2009). Epistasis for quantitative traits in crosses between soybean lines from China and the United States. Crop Science 49, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urben Filho, G. & Souza, P. I. M. (1993). Manejo da cultura da soja sob cerrado: época, densidade e profundidade de semeadura. In Cultura da Soja nos Cerrados (Eds Arantes, N. E. & Souza, P. I. M.), pp. 267–298. Piracicaba, SP, Brazil: POTAFOS.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Wang, R. & Hesket, J. D. (2001). Effects of photoperiod on growth and development of soybean floral bud in different maturity. Agronomy Journal 93, 944–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar