Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:24:18.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of coarsely chopped barley straw in high concentrate diets for beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. J. Forbes ,
J. H. D. Irwin  and
A. M. Raven
T. J. Forbes
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and the Queen's University of Belfast
J. H. D. Irwin
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and the Queen's University of Belfast
A. M. Raven
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and the Queen's University of Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An experiment was carried out in which the performance of cattle given diets containing 20 and 40% of coarsely chopped straw (1–3 in lengths) was compared with that of similar cattle given an all-concentrate diet. Each diet was offered ad libitum and twelve Hereford cross steers and twelve Friesian steers were used in the experiment. The live-weight gains and food conversion ratios were significantly better for the Hereford cross animals but there was no significant difference in over-all dry matter intakes. When the combined response of both breed types was considered there was a significantly linear decrease in live-weight gain with increasing straw intake, to the extent of 0.95 kg per week for each 10% increase in straw intake up to 40% in the diet. Similarly there was a significant increase in the conversion ratios of dry matter (P < 0·01) and organic matter (P < 0·01) with increasing straw intake. The effect on the dry matter conversion ratio was an increase of 1·67 units for each 10% increase in straw intake.

Two digestibility trials were carried out, one with coarsely chopped straw and one with coarsely milled straw, the levels of straw in the diets being the same. There was a slight decline in the digestibility of most constituents associated with milling but reductions were not very pronounced. A treatment was included in the second trial in which milled straw was included at 20% of the diet without maintaining the over-all crude protein content of the diet. The apparent digestibility of the organic matter was 5 percentage units lower with this treatment than with that containing the same level of straw in which the level of protein had been maintained.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 347 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beardsley, D. W. (1964). Nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. Part II. Beef cattle and sheep studies. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 239–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1956). The effect of the grinding and cubing process on the utilization of the energy of dried grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47, 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1966). The nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. I. Ground and pelleted v long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1966). A comparison of five breeds and crosses for intensive beef production. Rec. agric. Res. Minist. Agric. Nth. Ire. 15, Part 2, 39.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Raven, A. M. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1969). The use of coarsely milled barley straw in finishing diets for young beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamming, G. E. & Swan, H. (1967). The winter feeding of yarded beef cattle. Progress in livestock nutrition 1962–1967. U.S. Feed drains Council Tech. Publ. p. 7.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. & Clarke, P. T. (1966). Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. I. Substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet and its effect on performance and carcase quality. Anim. Prod. 8, 303–11.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A. (1964). Nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. Part I. General principles involved with ruminants and effect of feeding pelleted or wafered forage to dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 230–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Aitken, J. N., Whitelaw, F. G., MacDearmid, A., Philip, E. B. & MacLeod, N. A. (1963). Intensive beef production. 3. Performance of Friesian steers on low fibre diets. Anim. Prod. 5, 245–9.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M., Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1969). The utilization by beef cattle of concentrate diets containing different levels of milled barley straw and of protein. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1959). Proc. of conference on scientific principles of feeding farm livestock. Fmr Stk Breed. publ. 48–80.Google Scholar
Steele, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics New York, Toronto and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Wise, M. B., Blumer, T. N., Craig, H. B. – Barrick, E. R. (1965). Influence of rumen buffering agents and hay on performance and carcase characteristics of steers fed all-concentrate rations. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, M. B., Blumer, T. N., Matrone, G. & Barrick, E. R. (1961). Investigations on the feeding of all concentrate rations to beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 20, 561–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar