Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:41:30.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transcriptional and physiological changes of alfalfa in response to aluminium stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Q. CHEN ,
X. D. ZHANG ,
S. S. WANG ,
Q. F. WANG ,
G. Q. WANG ,
H. J. NIAN ,
K. Z. LI ,
Y. X. YU  and
L. M. CHEN
Q. CHEN
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
X. D. ZHANG
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
S. S. WANG
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
Q. F. WANG
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
G. Q. WANG
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
H. J. NIAN
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
K. Z. LI
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
Y. X. YU
Affiliation:
College of Zoological Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China
L. M. CHEN*
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Research Center, Bailong Campus, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Bailong Road, Kunming, 650224, China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: chenlimeikm@126.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Medicago sativa is an excellent pasture legume, but it is very sensitive to aluminium (Al) toxicity. To better understand the mechanism of M. sativa sensitivity to Al, a forward suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) cDNA library for an Al-sensitive cultivar, M. sativa L. cv. Yumu No. 1 (YM1), under 5 μm Al stress over a 24 h period was constructed to analyse changes in its gene expression in response to Al stress. Sequence analysis for the SSH cDNA library generated 291 high-quantity expression sequence tags (ESTs). Of these, 229 were known as functional ESTs, 137 of which have already been reported as Al response genes, whereas the other 92 were potentially novel Al-associated genes. The up-regulation of known Al resistance-associated genes encoding the transcription factor sensitive to proton rhizotoxicity 1 (STOP1) and malate transporter MsALMT1 (Al-activated malate transporter) as well as genes for antioxidant enzymes was observed. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis validated the reliability of the SSH data and confirmed the up-regulated expression of STOP1 and MsALMT1 under 5 μm Al stress. The analysis of physiological changes indicated that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde levels were elevated rapidly under 5 μm Al stress, suggesting that severe oxidative stress occurred in the YM1 roots. The up-regulation of antioxidant-related genes might be an important protective mechanism for YM1 in response to the oxidative stress induced by 5 μm Al toxicity. Al-induced malate exudation was increased drastically during the early period after Al treatment, which might have been due to the up-regulation and function of MsALMT and STOP1. However, malate exudation from the YM1 roots declined quickly during the subsequent period, and a gradual decrease in malate content was simultaneously observed in the YM1 roots. This result is in agreement with the observation that organic acid metabolism-associated enzymes such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, citrate synthase and malate dehydrogenase were not present in the SSH library. This might be a major reason for the YM1 sensitivity to Al.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 737 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baccouch, S., Chaoui, A. & Ferjani, E. E. (1998). Nickel-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in Zea mays shoots. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36, 689–694.Google Scholar
Barcelo, J. & Poschenrieder, C. (2002). Fast root growth responses, root exudates, and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and resistance: a review. Environmental and Experimental Botany 48, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandran, D., Sharopova, N., Ivashuta, S., Gantt, J. S., Vandenbosch, K. A. & Samac, D. A. (2008 a). Transcriptome profiling identified novel genes associated with aluminum toxicity, resistance and tolerance in Medicago truncatula. Planta 228, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandran, D., Sharopova, N., Vandenbosch, K. A., Garvin, D. F. & Samac, D. A. (2008 b). Physiological and molecular characterization of aluminum resistance in Medicago truncatula. BMC Plant Biology 8, 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-89.Google Scholar
Cserzo, M., Wallin, E., Simon, I., Von Heijne, G. & Elofsson, A. (1997). Prediction of transmembrane alpha-helices in procariotic membrane proteins: the Dense Alignment Surface method. Protein Engineering 10, 673–676.Google Scholar
Darkó, É., Ambrus, H., Stefanovits-Banyai, É., Fodor, J., Bakos, F. & Barnabas, B. (2004). Aluminium toxicity, Al tolerance and oxidative stress in an Al-sensitive wheat genotype and in Al-tolerant lines developed by in vitro microspore selection. Plant Science 166, 583–591.Google Scholar
Delhaize, E., Gruber, B. D. & Ryan, P. R. (2007). The roles of organic anion permeases in aluminium resistance and mineral nutrition. FEBS Letters 581, 2255–2262.Google Scholar
Delhaize, E., Ryan, P. R. & Randall, P. J. (1993). Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (II. aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices). Plant Physiology 103, 695–702.Google Scholar
Dragiiska, R., Djilianov, D., Denchev, P. & Atanassov, A. (1996). In vitro selection for osmotic tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 30–39.Google Scholar
Ermolayev, V., Weschke, W. & Manteuffel, R. (2003). Comparison of Al-induced gene expression in sensitive and tolerant soybean cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 2745–2756.Google Scholar
Eticha, D., Zahn, M., Bremer., M., Yang, Z. B., Rangel, A. F., Rao, I. M. & Horst, W. J. (2010). Transcriptomic analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to aluminium in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Plant Physiology 105, 1119–1128.Google Scholar
Ezaki, B., Gardner, R. C., Ezaki, Y. & Matsumoto, H. (2000). Expression of aluminum-induced genes in transgenic arabidopsis plants can ameliorate aluminum stress and/or oxidative stress. Plant Physiology 122, 657–666.Google Scholar
Gay, C. A. & Gebicki, J. M. (2003). Measurement of protein and lipid hydroperoxides in biological systems by the ferric–xylenol orange method. Analytical Biochemistry 315, 29–35.Google Scholar
Goodwin, S. B. & Sutter, T. R. (2009). Microarray analysis of Arabidopsis genome response to aluminum stress. Biologia Plantarum 53, 85–99.Google Scholar
Gucciardo, S., Wisniewski, J. P., Brewin, N. J. & Bornemann, S. (2007). A germin-like protein with superoxide dismutase activity in pea nodules with high protein sequence identity to a putative rhicadhesin receptor. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 1161–1171.Google Scholar
Guo, T. R., Zhang, G. P. & Zhang, Y. H. (2007). Physiological changes in barley plants under combined toxicity of aluminum, copper and cadmium. Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces 57, 182–188.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. E. & Ma, J. F. (2003). Al-induced efflux of organic acid anions is poorly associated with internal organic acid metabolism in triticale roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1753–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekenga, O. A., Maron, L. G., Piñerios, M. A., Cançado, G. M. A., Shaff, J., Kobayashi, Y., Ryan, P. R., Dong, B., Delhaize, E., Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamamoto, Y., Koyama, H. & Kochian, L. V. (2006). AtALMT1, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 103, 9738–9743.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. O. (2005). Genetic improvement of forage crops – past, present and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 143, 441–448.Google Scholar
Iuchi, S., Koyama, H., Iuchi, A., Kobayashi, Y., Kitabayashi, S., Kobayashi, Y., Ikka, T., Hirayama, T., Shinozaki, K. & Kobayashi, M. (2007). Zinc finger protein STOP1 is critical for proton tolerance in Arabidopsis and coregulates a key gene in aluminum tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 104, 9900–9905.Google Scholar
Kamp-Glass, M., Powell, D., Reddy, G. B., Baligar, V. C. & Wright, R. J. (1993). Biotechniques for improving acid aluminum tolerance in alfalfa. Plant Cell Reports 12, 590–592.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Y., Hoekenga, O. A., Itoh, H., Nakashima, M., Saito, S., Shaff, J. E., Maron, L. G., Piñeros, M. A., Kochian, L. V. & Koyama, H. (2007). Characterization of AtALMT1 expression in aluminum-inducible malate release and its role for rhizotoxic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 145, 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochian, L. V. (1995). Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 46, 237–260.Google Scholar
Koyama, H., Kawamura, A., Kihara, T., Hara, T., Takita, E. & Shibata, D. (2000). Overexpression of mitochondrial citrate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana improved growth on a phosphorus-limited soil. Plant and Cell Physiology 41, 1030–1037.Google Scholar
Kumari, M., Taylor, G. J. & Deyholos, M. K. (2008). Transcriptomic responses to aluminum stress in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 279, 339–357.Google Scholar
Li, X. F., Ma, J. F. & Matsumoto, H. (2000). Pattern of aluminum-induced secretion of organic acids differs between rye and wheat. Plant Physiology 123, 1537–1544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligaba, A., Katsuhara, M., Ryan, P. R., Shibasaka, M. & Matsumoto, H. (2006). The BnALMT1 and BnALMT2 genes from rape encode aluminum-activated malate transporters that enhance the aluminum resistance of plant cells. Plant Physiology 142, 1294–1303.Google Scholar
Lipton, D. S., Blanchar, R. W. & Blevins, D. G. (1987). Citrate, malate and succinate concentration in exudates from P-sufficient and P-stressed Medicago sativa L. seedlings. Plant Physiology 85, 315–317.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Magalhaes, J. V., Shaff, J. & Kochian, L. V. (2009). Aluminum-activated citrate and malate transporters from the MATE and ALMT families function independently to confer Arabidopsis aluminum tolerance. Plant Journal 57, 389–399.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F. & Furukawa, J. (2003). Recent progress in the research of external Al detoxification in higher plants: a minireview. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 97, 46–51.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F. & Hiradate, S. (2000). Form of aluminium for uptake and translocation in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Planta 211, 355–360.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F., Hiradate, S. & Matsumoto, H. (1998). High aluminum resistance in buckwheat. II. Oxalic acid detoxifies aluminum internally. Plant Physiology 117, 753–759.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F., Hiradate, S., Nomoto, K., Iwashita, T. & Matsumoto, H. (1997). Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in hydrangea (identification of Al form in the leaves). Plant Physiology 113, 1033–1039.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F., Ryan, P. R. & Delhaize, E. (2001). Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends in Plant Science 6, 273–278.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, J. V., Liu, J., Guimarães, C. T., Lana, U. G. P., Alves, V. M. C., Wang, Y. H., Schaffert, R. E., Hoekenga, O. A., Piñeros, M. A., Shaff, J. E., Klein, P. E., Carneiro, N. P., Coelho, C. M., Trick, H. N. & Kochian, L. V. (2007). A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nature Genetics 39, 1156–1161.Google Scholar
Mao, C., Yi, K., Yang, L., Zheng, B., Wu, Y., Liu, F. & Wu, P. (2004). Identification of aluminium-regulated genes by cDNA-AFLP in rice (Oryza sativa L.): aluminium-regulated genes for the metabolism of cell wall components. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 137–143.Google Scholar
Maron, L. G., Kirst, M., Mao, C., Milner, M. J., Menossi, M. & Kochian, L. V. (2008). Transcriptional profiling of aluminum toxicity and tolerance responses in maize roots. New Phytologist 179, 116–128.Google Scholar
Membre, N., Bernier, F., Staiger, D. & Berna, A. (2000). Arabidopsis thaliana germin-like proteins: common and specific features point to a variety of functions. Planta 211, 345–354.Google Scholar
Milla, M. A. R., Butler, E., Huete, A. R., Wilson, C. F., Anderson, O. & Gustafson, J. P. (2002). Expressed sequence tag-based gene expression analysis under aluminum stress in rye. Plant Physiology 130, 1706–1716.Google Scholar
Norusis, M. (2005). SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analyis. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pellet, D. M., Papernik, L. A. & Kochian, L. V. (1996). Multiple aluminum-resistance mechanisms in wheat (roles of root apical phosphate and malate exudation). Plant Physiology 112, 591–597.Google Scholar
Rangel, A. F., Rao, I. M., Braun, H. P. & Horst, W. J. (2010). Aluminum resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) involves induction and maintenance of citrate exudation from root apices. Physiologia Plantarum 138, 176–190.Google Scholar
Richards, K. D., Schott, E. J., Sharma, Y. K., Davis, K. R. & Gardner, R. C. (1998). Aluminum induces oxidative stress genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 116, 409–418.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E. & Jones, D. L. (2001). Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 527–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, P. R. & Kochian, L. V. (1993). Interaction between aluminum toxicity and calcium uptake at the root apex in near-isogenic lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in aluminum tolerance. Plant Physiology 102, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, P. R., Raman, H., Gupta, S., Horst, W. J. & Delhaize, E. (2009). A second mechanism for aluminum resistance in wheat relies on the constitutive efflux of citrate from roots. Plant Physiology 149, 340–351.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, Y., Ezaki, B., Katsuhara, M., Ahn, S. J., Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E. & Matsumoto, H. (2004). A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant Journal 37, 645–653.Google Scholar
Sawaki, Y., Iuchi, S., Kobayashi, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Ikka, T., Sakurai, N., Fujita, M., Shinozaki, K., Shibata, D., Kobayashi, M. & Koyama, H. (2009). STOP1 regulates multiple genes that protect Arabidopsis from proton and aluminum toxicities. Plant Physiology 150, 281–294.Google Scholar
Sledge, M. K., Bouton, J. H., Dall'agnoll, M., Parrott, W. A. & Kochertc, G. (2002). Identification and confirmation of aluminum tolerance qtl in diploid Medicago sativa subsp. coerulea. Crop Science 42, 1121–1128.Google Scholar
Sledge, M. K., Pechter, P. & Payton, M. E. (2005). Aluminum tolerance in Medicago truncatula germplasm. Crop Science 45, 2001–2004.Google Scholar
Sombra, L., Luconi, M., Silva, M. F., Olsina, R. A. & Fernandez, L. (2001). Spectrophotometric determination of trace aluminium content in parenteral solutions by combined cloud point preconcentration–flow injection analysis. Analyst 126, 1172–1176.Google Scholar
Tesfaye, M., Temple, S. J., Allan, D. L., Vance, C. P. & Samac, D. A. (2001). Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiology 127, 1836–1844.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. F., Zhao, Y., Yi, Q., Li, K. Z., Yu, Y. X. & Chen, L. M. (2010). Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic tobacco leaves: enhanced malate synthesis and augmented Al-resistance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32, 1209–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, D. A. (2003). Aluminium-responsive genes in sugarcane: identification and analysis of expression under oxidative stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1163–1174.Google Scholar
Yamaji, N., Huang, C. F., Nagao, S., Yano, M., Sato, Y., Nagamura, Y. & Ma, J. F. (2009). A zinc finger transcription factor ART1 regulates multiple genes implicated in aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Cell 21, 3339–3349.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. M., Nian, H., Sivaguru, M., Tanakamaru, S. & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Characterization of aluminium-induced citrate secretion in aluminium-tolerant soybean (Glycine max) plants. Physiologia Plantarum 113, 64–71.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. J., Yin, Y., Wang, Y. Q. & Peng, X. X. (2010). Identification of rice Al-responsive genes by semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction using Sulfite Reductase as a novel endogenous control. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 52, 505–514.Google Scholar
Zheng, S. J., Lin, X. Y., Yang, J. L., Liu, Q. & Tang, C. X. (2004). The kinetics of aluminum adsorption and desorption by root cell walls of an aluminum resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant and Soil 261, 85–90.Google Scholar
Zheng, S. J., Yang, J. L., He, Y. F., Yu, X. H., Zhang, L., You, J. F., Shen, R. F. & Matsumoto, H. (2005). Immobilization of aluminum with phosphorus in roots is associated with high aluminum resistance in buckwheat. Plant Physiology 138, 297–303.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chen Supplementary Material

Chen Supplementary Material

Download Chen Supplementary Material(File)
File 1.8 MB