Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:15:23.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A survey of annual pesticide usage during the control of sheep ectoparasites in Northern Ireland, 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2007

S. JESS*
Affiliation:
Applied Plant Science Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
C. KEARNS
Affiliation:
Applied Plant Science Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
D. I. MATTHEWS
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephen.jess@afbini.gov.uk

Summary

The current paper presents information from a survey of the practices associated with the control of ectoparasites on sheep in Northern Ireland in 2005, including the estimated total quantities of pesticide active ingredients used. It also provides comparative data to that obtained from previous surveys in 1981 (Jess & Marks 1986), 1988 (Foy et al.1995) and 1997 (Jess et al.2000). The total number of sheep farms in Northern Ireland decreased by 25% to 8822 farms with a consequent 26% reduction in total sheep population to 2·1 million sheep compared with the previous survey in 1997. During this period, the number of sheep treated for ectoparasites decreased by 40%. The total quantity of organophosphorus (OP) compounds used for ectoparasite control decreased by approximately 67%, from 7·8 tonnes in 1997 to 2·6 tonnes in 2005, during which an estimated 0·38 of all sheep treated for ectoparasites received the OP active ingredient diazinon. The survey results indicate a decline in the practice of plunge-dipping sheep for ectoparasite control with the proportion of farms using this treatment method decreasing from 0·58 to 0·16 between 1997 and 2005. In 1997, an estimated 0·8 of all sheep treated for ectoparasites in Northern Ireland were plunge-dipped, which reduced significantly to 0·28 during 2005. Conversely, the use of alternative methods has increased with pour-on formulations of insecticides, macrocyclic lactones and growth regulators being applied to 0·33 of all sheep treated in 2005 compared with 0·09 in 1997. Use of intramuscular or subcutaneous injections of macrocyclic lactones for ectoparasite control has also increased to 0·24 of all sheep treated in 2005 compared with 0·1 in 1997. The proportion of sheep treated in communal spray showers also increased from 0·01 in 1997 to 0·14 in 2005. Control of blowfly maggots (Lucilia spp.) and prevention of sheep scab (Psoroptes ovis) were the main reasons given by farmers for sheep treatments. On the farms that plunge-dipped, an estimated 0·68 of surplus dip wash was disposed of immediately after dipping took place, with 0·8 of farms emptying the dipping tanks using a vacuum tanker and 0·54 spreading the surplus dip wash directly onto land. An estimated 0·35 of these farmers mixed the dip wash with slurry pre-disposal. The survey suggests that the products used for spray showers are those recommended for plunge-dipping as there are no contemporary products recommended for use in spray showers. Macrocyclic lactone injections recorded in the survey had the dual function of controlling both endo- and ectoparasites.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (2001). Groundwater Protection Code, Use and Disposal of Sheep Dip Compounds. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
Anon. (2005). Statistical Review of Northern Ireland Agriculture 2004, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Economics and Statistics Division. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
Anon. (2006). Compendium of Data Sheets for Animal Medicines 2007. Enfield, Middlesex: National Office of Animal Health.Google Scholar
Bates, P. G. (1993). Alternative methods for the control of sheep scab. The Veterinary Record 133, 467469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foy, R. H., Clenaghan, C., Jess, S. & Mitchell, S. H. (1995). Assessing the environmental impact of sheep dip on surface waters in Northern Ireland. In Pesticides: Developments, Impacts and Controls (Eds Best, G. & Ruthven, A.), pp 8799. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jess, S., Kidd, S. L. B., McCallion, T. & Matthews, D. I. (2000). A survey of annual pesticide usage during the control of sheep ectoparasites in Northern Ireland, 1997. Pest Management Science 56, 9951004.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jess, S. & Marks, R. J. (1986). A survey of pesticide usage in sheep dips in Northern Ireland 1981. Record of Agricultural Research in Northern Ireland 34, 6165.Google Scholar