Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:18:14.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on lucerne and lucerne-grass leys III. The effect of variety of lucerne and strain of grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. J. Ridgman ,
F. Hanley  and
M. G. Barker
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
F. Hanley
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
M. G. Barker
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An experiment comparing the growth and productivity of six varieties of lucerne representing a wide diversity of ecological conditions grown in association with S 37 Cocksfoot, S143 Cocksfoot and a commercial cocksfoot/timothy mixture is described and the results discussed.

2. Variety of lucerne had a marked effect on establishment, persistence, recovery from defoliation, early spring growth, yield of total dried produce, proportion of lucerne in that produce and on yield of nitrogen.

3. There was no evidence of differing degrees of compatibility of varieties of lucerne with the three strains of grass used.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1956 , pp. 50 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Garner, F. H. & Sanders, H. G. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. P. & Zaleski, A. (1952). J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 6, 212.Google Scholar
Parker, W. H. (1931). J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 3, 111.Google Scholar
Westover, H. L. (1945). Fmrs' Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1731.Google Scholar
Williams, W. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 113.Google Scholar