Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:52:17.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection of tomato genotypes resistant to tomato leaf curl virus disease using biochemical and physiological markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

R. K. SINGH ,
N. RAI ,
M. SINGH ,
S. N. SINGH  and
K. SRIVASTAVA
R. K. SINGH
Affiliation:
Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research (IIVR), P.B. No. 5001, P.O. BHU, Varanasi, UP 221005, India Department of Botany, Udai Pratap Autonomous P.G. College, Bhojubir, Varanasi, UP 221002, India
N. RAI*
Affiliation:
Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research (IIVR), P.B. No. 5001, P.O. BHU, Varanasi, UP 221005, India
M. SINGH
Affiliation:
Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research (IIVR), P.B. No. 5001, P.O. BHU, Varanasi, UP 221005, India
S. N. SINGH
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Udai Pratap Autonomous P.G. College, Bhojubir, Varanasi, UP 221002, India
K. SRIVASTAVA
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: nrai1964@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A total of 34 tomato genotypes (24 F1+10 parents) were tested for resistance to tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV) disease by various whitefly inoculation techniques under field and insect-proof glasshouse (mass and cage) conditions. Of the ten tomato parental lines, two accessions [EC-520061 (Solanum habrochaites) and EC-521080 (Solanum pimpinellifolium)] were identified as highly resistant while four accessions (EC-520049, EC-528372, WIR-5032 and WIR-3957) of wild species were resistant to ToLCV. Out of the 24 F1 crosses, PBC×EC-520061, H-86×EC-520061, H-24×EC-520061 and DVRT-2×EC-520061 were found to be highly resistant against ToLCV disease. Biochemical (total phenol and total sugar concentration) and physiological (chlorophyll content and leaf area index) parameters were also used in healthy and disease-inoculated leaves of ten parents and six F1 hybrids to test the conformity of ToLCV-resistant and susceptible disease reactions. The results showed that among the 16 genotypes (10 parents+6 F1), EC-520061, EC-520049, PBC×EC-520061 and H-86×EC-520061 were stable for both biochemical and physiological markers while EC-521080 showed higher accumulations of total phenol and sugar concentrations and reduced leaf size between healthy and disease-inoculated leaves. The present study demonstrates the importance of the whitefly inoculation technique and biochemical and physiological markers in virus resistance screening programmes, and identifies a potential source of resistance to the ToLCV in Solanum species.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 4 , May 2015 , pp. 646 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banerjee, M. K. & Kalloo, G. (1987 a). Sources and inheritance of resistance to leaf curl virus in Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 73, 707–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, M. K. & Kalloo, (1987 b). Inheritance of tomato leaf curls virus resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum. Euphytica 36, 581–584.Google Scholar
Banerjee, M. K. & Kalloo, G. (1989 a). The inheritance of earliness and fruit weight in crosses between cultivated tomatoes and two wild species of Lycopersicon. Plant Breeding 102, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, M. K. & Kalloo, G. (1989 b). Effect of tomato leaf curl virus on biochemical attributes in resistant/susceptible plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Vegetable Science 16, 21–31.Google Scholar
Banerjee, M. K. & Kalloo, G. (1989 c). Role of phenols in resistance to tomato leaf curl virus, fusarium wilt and fruit borer in Lycopersicon. Current Science 58, 575–576.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Fu, R. & Li, X. (2011). Tomato yellow leaf virus (TYLCV): the structure, ecotypes and the resistance germplasm resources in tomato. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 13361–13367.Google Scholar
Czosnek, H. (2007). Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus Disease: Management, Molecular Biology and Breeding for Resistance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. & Smith, F. (1956). Colorometric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350–356.Google Scholar
Gevorkyan, Z. G., Adhzhemyan, L. A. & Gasparyan, P. V. (1976). Tomato leaf curl disease, its pathomorphology, and effects on physiological and biochemical properties of plants (Russian Summary). Izvestiya Sibirskogo Otdeleniya Akademii Nauk Sssr Seriya Khimicheskikh Nauk 5, 38–40.Google Scholar
Kalloo, G. & Banerjee, M. K. (1990). Transfer of tomato leaf curl virus resistance from Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum to L. esculentum. Plant Breeding 105, 156–159.Google Scholar
Kalloo, G. & Banerjee, M. K. (2000). H-24: moderately leaf curl resistant variety of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Vegetable Science 27, 117–120.Google Scholar
Kirthi, N., Maiya, S. P., Murthy, M. R. & Savithri, H. S. (2002). Evidence for recombination among the tomato leaf curl virus strains/species from Bangalore, India. Archives of Virology 147, 255–272.Google Scholar
Marco, S. (1975). Chlorophyll content of tomato yellow leaf curl virus-infected tomatoes in relation to virus resistance. Phytoparasitica 3, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshe, A., Pfannstiel, J., Yariv, B., Kolot, M., Sobol, I., Czosnek, H. & Gorovits, R. (2012). Stress responses to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) infection of resistant and susceptible tomato plants are different. Metabolomics S1-006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2153-0769.S1-006Google Scholar
Muniyappa, V., Padmaja, A. S., Venkatesh, H. M., Sharma, A., Chandrasekhar, S., Kulkarni, R. S., Hanson, P. M., Chen, J. T., Green, S. K. & Colvin, J. (2002). Tomato leaf curl virus resistant tomato lines TLB111, TLB130, and TLB182. HortScience 37, 603–606.Google Scholar
Pasumarthy, K. K., Choudhury, N. R. & Mukherjee, S. K. (2010). Tomato leaf curl Kerala virus (ToLCKeV). AC3 protein forms a higher order oligomer and enhances ATPase activity of replication initiator protein (Rep/AC1). Virology Journal 7–128. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-128Google Scholar
Peralta, I. E., Knapp, S. & Spooner, D. M. (2005). New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum section lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from Northern Peru. Systematic Botany 30, 424–434.Google Scholar
Picó, B., José Díez, M. & Nuez, F. (1998). Evaluation of whitefly-mediated inoculation techniques to screen Lycopersicon esculentum and wild relatives for resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Euphytica 101, 259–271.Google Scholar
Ranganna, S. (1986). Handbook of Analysis of Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Shankarappa, K. S., Sriharsha, , Rangaswamy, K. T., Aswathanarayana, D. S., Prameela, H. A., Kulkarni, R. S., Muniyappa, V., Mohan Rao, A. & Maruthi, M. N. (2008). Development of tomato hybrids resistant to tomato leaf curl virus disease in South India. Euphytica 164, 531–539.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Rai, N. & Singh, N. (2010). Response of tomato genotypes to tomato leaf curl virus. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80, 755–758.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Rai, N., Singh, M., Saha, S. & Singh, S. N. (2014). Detection of tomato leaf curl virus resistance and inheritance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859613000932Google Scholar
Swain, T. & Hillis, W. E. (1959). The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. I. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 10, 63–68.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. & Varma, A. (2002). Identification of sources of resistance in Lycopersicon species to Tomato leaf curl geminivirus (ToLCV) by agroinoculation. Euphytica 129, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidavsky, F., Leviatov, S., Milo, J., Rabinowitch, H. D., Kedar, N. & Czosnek, H. (1998). Response of tolerant breeding lines of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, originating from three different sources (L. peruvianum, L. pimpinellifolium and L. chilense) to early controlled inoculation by tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV). Plant Breeding 117, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar