Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:32:06.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retention times in the rumen of roughages and a protein supplement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Sriskandarajah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
R. C. Kellaway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
Jane Leibholz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570, Australia

Extract

The extent to which proteins fed to ruminants are degraded in the rumen is determined by their rate of degradation and retention time in the rumen. It is known that retention times in the rumen are much longer for poor quality than for good quality roughages. Thus, it is possible that protein supplements may be more extensively degraded when fed with poor than when fed with good quality roughages. The present experiment was designed to determine the relationship between retention times of roughages and a protein supplement fed with them.

Type
Short Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ganev, G., Orskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Analysis: Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A. Agricultural Handbook no. 379, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1966). The apparent retention of food in the reticulorumen at two levels of feeding by means of an hourly feeding technique. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 765773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed