Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T08:10:54.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of cotton to water and nitrogen in a tropical environment: I. Frequency of watering and method of application of nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. B. Hearn
A. B. Hearn
Affiliation:
Division of Land Use Research, CSIRO, Kununurra, W.A., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two experiments were made in successive years in which three frequencies of watering were combined factorially with several rates and methods of applying nitrogen. Soil water content and leaf water potential were measured. The least frequent watering treatment decreased yield and nitrogen applications increased yield. All of the effect of water and most of the effect of nitrogen were associated with changes in the number rather than the weight of bolls. Although the combination of heavy nitrogen with frequent watering caused the crop initially to set fruit more slowly than did heavy nitrogen with infrequent watering, it prolonged flowering and increased the number of fruit ultimately set. Thus yield and the potential duration and cost of insect control were also increased. There were no differences in yield nor rate of setting between the following methods of application of the nitrogen: all applied to the seed bed; split application between the seed bed and side dressing 2 months later; and split application between the seed bed, side dressing, and irrigation water. However, when application was split so that most was applied in the water, the response was not as great. Application of nitrogen combined with frequent watering decreased the weight of the early bolls by decreasing fibre per seed. Nitrogen increased the weight of later bolls by increasing the number and weight of seeds. The practical and physiological implications of these results are discussed and a crop nutritional hypothesis for cotton developed further.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 407 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basinski, J. J., Beech, D. F., Evenson, J. P. & Wetselaar, R. (1971). Cotton responses to nitrogen: effect of land pre-treatment and fertilizer applications. Cotton Growing Review 48, 175–93.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. & De Wit, C. T. (1968). A simulation model of plant growth with special attention to root growth and its consequences. In Root Growth (ed. Whittington, W. J.), pp. 224–44. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Christidis, B. G. & Harrison, G. J. (1955). Cotton Growth Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Crowther, F. (1934). Studies in growth analysis of the cotton plant under irrigation in the Sudan. I. The effect of different combinations of nitrogen applications and water supply. Annals of Botany 48, 877–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, F. M. (1931). Early defoliations as a method of increasing cotton yields and the relation of fruitfulness to fibre and boll characters. Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 447–62.Google Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1975 a). Crop physiology. In Agricultural Research for Development (ed. Arnold, M. H.). Cotton Research Corporation, London. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1975 b). The Ord valley cotto n crop: the development of a technology. Cotton Growing Review.(In the Press.)Google Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1975 c). The response of cotton to water and nitrogen in a tropical environment. II. The date of last water and rate of application of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 84, 419–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1975 d). An economic assessment of the response of cotton to nitrogen and water in the Ord valley, north western Australia. Cotton Growing Review. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Jordan, W. R. (1970). Growth of cotton seedlings in relation to maximum daily plant water potential. Agronomy Journal 62, 699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, T. F., Grimes, D. W., Yamada, H., Bassett, D. & Stockton, J. R. (1970). Insects in cotton as affected by irrigation and fertilization practices. Californian Agriculturalist 24, 12–14.Google Scholar
Levin, I. & Schmueli, E. (1964). The response of cotton to various irrigation regimes in the Hula Valley. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 211–25.Google Scholar
Mason, T. G. (1922). Growth and abscission in Sea Island Cotton. Annals of Botany 36, 457–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, B. L., Jordan, W. R. & Powell, R. D. (1973). Abscission processes in cotton: induction by plant water deficit. Agronomy Journal 65, 202–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatyer, R. O. (1967). Plants-Water Relationships. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stockton, J. R., Doneen, L. D. & Walhood, V. T. (1961). Boll shedding and growth of the cotton plant in relation to irrigation frequency. Agronomy Journal 53, 272–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, N. J. (1965). The effects of nitrogen fertilization on irrigated cotton at the Kimberley Research Station, north western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5, 218–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, T. C. & Tucker, B. B. (1968). Nitrogen nutrition. In Advances in Production and Utilization of Quality Cotton (ed. Elliot, F. C., Hoover, M. and Porter, W. K. Jr.), pp. 183–211. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar