Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T18:38:58.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Precision drilling combining peas (Pisum sativum L.) of contrasting leaf types at varying densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. C. Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LEI 2 5RD
P. D. Hebblethwaite
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LEI 2 5RD

Summary

Field experiments were conducted in 1983–4 to investigate the effect of precision drilling and plant density on establishment, growth, radiation interception and yield of combining peas of varying leaf phenotype (Varieties ‘Birte’, leafed; ‘Filby’, leafless; and ‘BS3’, semi-leafless). Precision drilling established a more uniform plant distribution than øyjord drilling; visual differences observed soon after emergence were not observed at flowering. Precision drilling resulted in more radiation interception early in the season for semi-leafless but not leafed peas; dry-matter production and photosynthetic area index (PAI) were not increased. Yield data indicated that precision drilling produced similar yields to øyjord drilling at similar densities. Increasing plant density increased radiation interception, dry-matter production and PAI during vegetative growth; density treatment effects were less marked post-flowering. Pea leaf phenotypes differed in their yield response to increasing density. Radiation interception was related to dry-matter production and PAI to obtain an estimate of photosynthetic efficiency (ε) and the attenuation coefficient (k), respectively, ε and k were constant irrespective of spatial arrangement, leaf phenotype and plant density. The relative importance of spatial arrangement and plant density in increasing radiation interception and PAI and influence on yield is discussed; other potential agronomic advantages of precision drilling are described.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, D. R., Berry, G. J., Heath, M. C. & Dawkins, T. C. K. (1985). Pea (Pisum sativum L). In Grain Legume Crops (ed. Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.), Ch. 5. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Heath, M. C. & Hebblethwaitb, P. D. (1984). A basis for improving the dried pea crop. Outlook on Agriculture 13, 195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. C. & Hebblethwaite, P. D. (1985). Solar radiation interception by leafless, semi-leafless and leafed peas (Pisum sativum) under contrasting field conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 107, 309318.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. L. & Ambrose, M. J. (1981). Designing ‘leafless’ plants for improving yields of the dried pea crop. Advances in Agronomy 34, 255277.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. L. & Ambrose, M. J. (1985). The application of plant physiology to the development of dried pea crop plants. In The Pea Crop – a Basis for Improvement (ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D., Heath, M. C. and Dawkins, T. C. K.), Ch. 8. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Meadley, J. T. & Milbourn, G. M. (1971). The growth of vining peas. III. The effect of shading on abscission of flowers and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1973). Principles of Environmental Physics, 241 pp. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. & Elston, J. (1983). Performance and productivity of foliage in the field. In The Growth and Functioning of Leaves (ed. Dale, J. E. and Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 499518. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snoad, B. (1980). The origin, performance and breeding of leafless peas. ADAS Quarterly Review 37, 6986.Google Scholar