Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:39:43.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. I. Ground and pelleted v. long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. W. A. Burt
A. W. A. Burt
Affiliation:
Unilever Research Laboratory, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Twenty-four individually fed yearling Ayrshire heifers were used to compare diets consisting of (1) long barley straw and concentrates; (2) the same quantities of similar foods as in (1) but with most of the barley straw ground and pelleted with a proportion of the concentrates in a ratio of 70:30; (3) replacement of the whole of diet (1) by the pelleted 70:30 mixture to provide a similar theoretical starch-equivalent intake.

2. Live-weight gains over an experimental period of 10 weeks were: treatment 1, 0.55 lb./day; treatment 2,0.99 lb./day; treatment 3,1.23 lb./day. These differences were statistically significant and indicated a marked response in energy value due to processing the straw.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 131 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, R. A. & Hentges, J. F. jr, (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon, (1964). Farm and Country. 11.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Blaxter, K. L. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 413.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N.McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Broster, W. H., Rook, J. A. H. & Tuck, V. J. (1965). J. Dairy Res. 32, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, D. W. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1964). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1964). J. Agric. Sci. 63, 113.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1963). Brit. J. Nutr. 17, 263.Google Scholar
Church, D. C., McArthur, A. B. & Fox, C. W. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 644.Google Scholar
Cullison, A. E. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 478.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1959). Proc. of Conference on Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Fmr & Stk-Breed.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Fries, J. A. & Braman, W. W. (1925). J. Agr. Res. 31, 987.Google Scholar
Grieve, C. M., Robblee, A. R., Berg, R. T. & McElroy, L. W. (1963). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 43, 189.Google Scholar
Hartman, R. H., Stahelli, D. L., Holleman, R. G. & Horn, L. R. H. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, D. P., Pigden, W. J., Minson, D. J. & Pritchard, G. I. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R. M. & Hanke, H. E. (1965). Anim. Prod. 7, 233.Google Scholar
King, W. A., O'Dell, G. D., Cook, W. C. & Moore, S. L. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 38.Google Scholar
Lindahl, I. L. & Reynolds, P. J. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1074.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J. E., Pope, L. S., Stephens, D. F. & Waller, G. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, S. W. & Goss, H. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 163.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Weir, W. C., Dobie, J. B. & Hull, J. L. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1963). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18, 39.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, P. J. & Lindahl, I. L. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 873.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. W. & Woods, W. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigue, C. B. & Allen, N. N. (1960). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1963). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23, 251.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1959). Proc. of Conference on Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Fmr & Stk-Breed.Google Scholar
Weir, W. C., Meyer, J. H., Garrett, W., Lofgreen, G. P. & Ittner, N. R. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1948). Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., no. 48, 11th ed.Google Scholar
Woods, W. & Luther, R. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 809.Google Scholar
Woods, W. & Rhodes, R. W. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 479.Google Scholar
Wright, P. L., Pope, A. L. & Phillips, P. H. (1963). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 586.Google Scholar