Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:47:56.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of huddling and body size on the metabolic rate of the young pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. E. Mount
L. E. Mount
Affiliation:
From the A.R.C. Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The oxygen consumption of young pigs from 1 to 37 days of age has been measured in a closed circuit respiratory metabolism chamber, over the environmental temperature range 4–37° C.

2. The values obtained for single pigs alone in the chamber have been compared with the results of measurements on groups of pigs 3–6 days of age taken together.

3. It has been found that as environmental temperature falls below 30° C. and the grouped pigs huddle together, oxygen consumption per kg. for the group becomes smaller than values for single pigs of the same individual weight, and corresponds more with results from the larger single pig.

4. Rectal temperature is maintained in pigs of the group at a lower energy cost than that required for the single pig, the saving in energy expenditure becoming proportionately greater as ambient temperature falls.

5. These results are discussed in relation to body size and skin temperature.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , August 1960 , pp. 101 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, F. G. (1958). Vital Energetics. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 503, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Cairnie, A. B. & Pullar, J. D. (1957). J. Physiol. 139, 15P.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. F. (1832). On the Influence of Physical Agents on Life. London.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1947). Physiol. Rev. 27, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, L. E. (1959 a). J. Physiol. 147, 333.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. (1959 b). J. Physiol. 147, 24P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, L. E. & Rowbll, J. G. (1960). Nature, Lond. In the Press.Google Scholar