Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T19:08:25.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Induction of pregnancy in lactating anoestrous ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. P. Boland ,
T. F. Crosby  and
I. Gordon
M. P. Boland
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College, Lyons Estate, Newcastle P.O., Co. Dublin, Eire
T. F. Crosby
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College, Lyons Estate, Newcastle P.O., Co. Dublin, Eire
I. Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College, Lyons Estate, Newcastle P.O., Co. Dublin, Eire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Efforts have been made to control the oestrous cycle of ewes so that breeding can be induced at most times of the year (Gordon, 1963, 1975; Cognie, Hernandez-Barreto & Saumande, 1975; Smith, Boland & Gordon, 1981). Despite a high oestrous response, conception rates have generally been low in lactating anoestrous ewes (Hunter, 1968; Land & McClelland, 1971; Cognie et al. 1975; Shevah, Black & Land, 1975). The ability to achieve conception in post-partum ewes appears to be related to season, breed and lactational status (Cognie et al. 1975; Evans & Robinson, 1980; Rhind et al. 1980). Early research has shown that conception rates of 90% can be achieved in Finnish Landrace × Dorset Horn ewes using exogenous hormones, early weaning and artificial lighting (Robinson, Fraser & McHattie, 1975). Subsequent studies have shown that similar results can be obtained under natural daylight conditions provided that each ewe received pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) at the time of sponge withdrawal (Fraser el al. 1976). Some breeds of sheep may be induced to lamb at 6-month intervals, when maintained under ideal conditions including artificial lighting (Evans & Robinson, 1980). There seems to be some conflict in the literature as to factors affecting conception rate in ewes. Kann & Martinet (1975) have shown that it is the problem of suckling rather than lactation that is responsible for the delay in return to normal reproductive activity. It has been shown that luteinizing hormone (LH) release is quantitatively less in lactating than in cyclic ewes (Cognie & Pelletier, 1976; Evans, 1980). Also the pattern of LH production has been shown to differ in ewes conceiving and those which fail to conceive (Rhind et al. 1980). Cognie & Pelletier (1976) have suggested that in lactating ewes, a proportion of eggs are shed abnormally late in relation to the LH surge and may not be fertilized. The purpose of the present experiment was to investigate some of the factors which may influence the induction of pregnancy in nursing ewes in the non-breeding season.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 465 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boland, M. P. & Gordon, I. (1979). Effect of timing of ram introduction on fertility in progestagen – PMSG treated anoestrous ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coonie, Y., Hernandez-Barreto, M. & Saumande, J. (1975). Low fertility in nursing ewes during the nonbreeding season. Annales de Biologic Animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 15, 329–343.Google Scholar
Coonie, Y. & Pelletier, J. (1976). Preovulatory LH release and ovulation in dry and in lactating ewes after progestagen and PMSG treatment during the seasonal anoestrum. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 16, 529–536.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. G. S. & Black, W. J. M. (1978). A twice yearly lambing system, using Finnish Landrace and Dorset Horn ewes. Animal Production 26, 301–308.Google Scholar
Dziuk, P. J. (1970). Estimation of optimum time for insemination of gilts and ewes by double-mating at certain times relative to ovulation. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 22, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. (1980). Reproductive potential and endocrinological responses of sheep kopt under controlled lighting. III. Prolactin and pituitary responsiveness to gonadotrophin releasing hormone in the post partum period. Animal Reproduction Science 3, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. & Robinson, T. J. (1980). Reproductive potential and endocrinological responses of sheep kept under controlled lighting. I. Comparative reproductive performance of four bred types of ewe. Animal Reproduction Science 3, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. & Gill, J. C. (1976). Field studies on the reproductive performance of Finnish Landrace × Dorset Horn ewes. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 5, 162–163.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. (1963). The induction of pregnancy in the anoestrous ewe by hormonal therapy. II. Progesterone - pregnant mares' serum application in anoestrus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 60, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (1971). Induction of early breeding in sheep by standard and modified progestagen - PMS treatments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (1975). The use of progestagens in sheep bred by natural and artificial insemination. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 15, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. L. (1968). Increasing the frequency of pregnancy in sheep. II. Artificial control of rebreeding and problems of conception and maintenance of pregnancy during the post-partum period. Animal Breeding Abstracts 36, 533–553.Google Scholar
Kann, G. & Martinet, J. (1975). Prolactin levels and duration of postpartum anoestrus in lactating ewes. Nature, London 257, 63–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Land, R. B. & McClelland, T. H. (1971). The performance of Finn–Dorset sheep allowed to mate four times in two years. Animal Production 13, 637–641.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Robinson, J. J., Chesworth, J. M. & Phillipo, M. (1980). Effects of season, location and plane of nutrition on the reproductive performance and associated plasma LH and progesterone profiles in hormonally treated ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 58, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & McHattie, I. (1975). The use of progestagens and photo periodism in improving the reproductive rate of the ewe. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 15, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevah, Y., Black, W. J. M. & Land, R. B. (1975). The effects of nutrition on the reproductive performance of Finn × Dorset ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 45, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P. A. (1977). Studies in the artificial insemination of sheep. Ph.D. thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Smith, P. A., Boland, M. P. & Gordon, I. (1981). Effect of type of intravaginal progestagen on the outcome of fixed-time artificial insemination applications. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesely, J. A. (1978). Application of light control to shorten the production cycle in two breeds of sheep. Animal Production 26, 169–176.Google Scholar