Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:47:30.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: the effect of sowing date and soil type on root growth of high-yielding crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. B. Barraclough  and
R. A. Leigh
P. B. Barraclough
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
R. A. Leigh
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of sowing date on root growth of high-yielding crops (8–1 It grain/ha, 85% D.M.) of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hustler) was measured at Rothamsted and Woburn in 1980 and 1981. Roots were sampled by coring on five occasions and changes in root dry weight and length were determined. The average growth rate between March and June was about 1 g/m2/day (200 m/m2/day), over 5 times that measured between December and March. Increases in root weight or length with time were generally exponential to anthesis when the crops had 101–172 g root/m2 (20–32 km/m2). September-sown wheat had more root than October-sown wheat at all times, but whereas early differences in length were maintained throughout the season, root weights converged between March and June. Overall, there was no significant difference in root dry-matter production between sites at anthesis, but there was a substantial difference between years. Differences in root growth between crops were reduced by plotting the amount of root against either the number of days from sowing or accumulated thermal time. Using che latter, root growth between December and June was reasonably linear although there was some indication of a lag below 500 °C days. Regression equations obtained for the relationships between root growth and accumulated thermal time also fitted previously published data and may provide general descriptions of root growth with time.

Roots of September-sown crops reached 1 m depth by December but those of October-sown crops were not detectable at this depth until April. For most crops the distribution of roots with depth was reasonably described by an exponential decay function, with over 50% of the roots in the top 20 cm of soil at all times. At Woburn in 1981, a plough-pan restricted roots to the upper soil horizons for most of the season but apparently had little effect on the total amount of root produced. For one of the experimental crops an empirical mathematical function describing the distribution of roots with depth and time is presented.

Using the data from this and previously published studies, the relationship between grain yield and the amount of root at anthesis was investigated. Total root length was positively correlated with grain yield but nonetheless similarly yielding crops could have different-sized root systems. Total root dry weight was poorly correlated with grain yield.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 59 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Böhm, W. (1978). Investigations on root development in winter wheat. Zeitschrift für Acker-und Pflanzenbau 147 (4), 264–269.Google Scholar
Ellis, F. B. & Barnes, B. T. (1980). Growth and development of root systems of winter cereals grown after different tillage methods including direct drilling. Plant and Soil 55, 283–295.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Wallace, J. S. (1979). Field studies of cereal leaf growth. IV. Winter wheat leaf extension in relation to temperature and leaf water status. Journal of Experimental Botany 30 (117), 657–668.Google Scholar
Gerwitz, A. & Page, E. R. (1974). An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 773–781.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. I. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. (1981). The fitted curve in plant growth studies. In Mathematics and Plant Physiology (ed. Rose, D. A. and Charles-Edwards, D. A.), pp. 283–295London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Rackham, O. (1971). A note on the root growth of barley. Journal of Applied Ecology 8, 919–924.Google Scholar
Kmoch, H. G., Ramig, R. E., Fox, R. L. & Koehler, F. E. (1957). Root development of winter wheat as influenced by soil moisture and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal 49, 20–25.Google Scholar
Lester, E. (1981). Factors limiting the yield of winter wheat. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1980, part 1, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
Lester, E. (1982). Factors limiting the yield of winter wheat. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1981, part 1, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H., Oliver, R. H., Ellis, F. B., Barnes, B. T., Howse, K. R., Welbank, P. J. & Taylor, P. J. (1974). Root and shoot growth of semi-dwarf and taller winter wheats. Annals of Applied Biology 77, 129–144.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. The Journal of Ecology 63, 995–1001.Google Scholar
Welbank, P. J., Gibb, M. J., Taylor, P. J. & Williams, E. D. (1974). Root growth of cereal crops. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1973, part 2, pp. 26–60.Google Scholar