Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:56:42.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use in UK-grown short-day strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duch) crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2010

D. J. WARNER ,
M. DAVIES ,
N. HIPPS ,
N. OSBORNE ,
J. TZILIVAKIS  and
K. A. LEWIS
D. J. WARNER*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Environment Research Unit, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
M. DAVIES
Affiliation:
East Malling Research, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK
N. HIPPS
Affiliation:
East Malling Research, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK
N. OSBORNE
Affiliation:
East Malling Research, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK
J. TZILIVAKIS
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Environment Research Unit, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
K. A. LEWIS
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Environment Research Unit, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: d.j.warner@herts.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and optimizing energy consumption are important for mitigating climate change and improving resource use efficiency. Strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duch) crops are a key component of the UK soft fruit sector and potentially resource-intensive crops. This is the first study to undertake a detailed environmental impact assessment of all methods of UK strawberry production. A total of 14 systems with six additional sub-systems grown for between 1 and 3 years were identified. They were defined by the growing of short-day (Junebearer) or everbearer varieties, organic production, covering with polytunnels or grown in the open, soil-grown (with or without fumigation) or container-grown (with peat or coir substrate) and summer or spring planted. Pre-harvest, the global warming potential varied between 1·5 and 10·3 t CO2 equiv/ha/crop or 0·13 and 1·14 t CO2 equiv/t of class 1 fruit. Key factors included the use of tunnels, mulch and irrigation, sterilization of soil with fumigants and the use of peat substrate. Seasonal crops without covers grown where rotation of sufficient length reduced Verticillium (system 4) were the most efficient. System 4a (that did not use mulch) emitted 0·13 t CO2 equiv/t of class 1 fruit. A second or third cropping year in soil-grown systems prolonged the effect of mulch and soil fumigants. Greenhouse gases from system 4 (with mulch) averaged 0·30 t CO2 equiv/t of class 1 fruit after 3 years of cropping compared to 0·63 and 0·36 t CO2 equiv/t after 1 and 2 years, respectively.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 148 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 667 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abad, M., Noguera, P., Puchades, R., Maquieira, A. & Noguera, V. (2002). Physico-chemical and chemical properties of some coconut coir dusts for use as a peat substitute for containerised ornamental plants. Bioresource Technology 82, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon (2008). Climate Change Act: Chapter 27. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Blanke, M. M. & Burdick, B. (2005). Food (miles) for thought: energy balance for locally-grown versus imported apple fruit. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 12, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bousted, I. (2000). Eco-profiles of the European Plastics Industry. Nylon 6. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Plastics in the Environment.Google Scholar
Bousted, I. (2003). Eco-profiles of the European Plastics Industry. Polyolefins. Brussels, Belgium: The Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe (APME).Google Scholar
Brentrup, F. & Pallière, C. (2008). GHG Emissions and Energy Efficiency in European Nitrogen Fertiliser Production and Use. In The International Fertiliser Society Proceedings, Vol. 639. York, UK: International Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Syed, B., Jarvis, S. C., Sneath, R. W., Phillips, V. R., Goulding, K. W. T. & Lie, C. (2002). Development and application of a mechanistic model to estimate emission of nitrous oxide from UK agriculture. Atmospheric Environment 36, 917–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BSI (2008). PAS 2050:2008. Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services. Publicly Available Specification. British Standards Institute, Carbon Trust, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).Google Scholar
Chambers, B. J., Lord, E. I., Nicholson, F. A. & Smith, K. A. (1999). Predicting nitrogen availability and losses following application of organic manure to arable land: MANNER. Soil Use and Management 15, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudrie, S. L., Jackson, J., Watterson, J. D., Murrells, T., Passant, N., Thomson, A., Cardenas, L., Leech, A., Mobbs, D. C. & Thistlethwaite, G. (2008). UK Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990 to 2006: Annual Report for Submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change. AEAT/ENV/R/2582. Didcot, UK: AEA Group.Google Scholar
Dalgaard, T., Halberg, N. & Porter, J. R. (2001). A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A. & Schimel, J. P. (1996). Microbial processes of production and consumption of nitric oxide, nitrous oxide and methane. In Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water (Eds Matson, P. A. & Harriss, R. C.), pp. 327–357. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (2005). Sustainable Development Action Plan – Just Jump Straight In. London: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (2009 a). Commodities. In Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2009, pp. 27–51. Available online at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/general/auk/latest/index.htm (verified 19 May 2010)Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2009b). The 2009 Guidelines to DEFRA/DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting (Annexes). London: DEFRA Publications.Google Scholar
De Vries, W., Kros, J., Oenema, O. & De Klein, J. (2003). Uncertainties in the fate of nitrogen II: a quantitative assessment of the uncertainties in major nitrogen fluxes in the Netherlands. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 66, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbie, K. E. & Smith, K. A. (2003). Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water-filled pore space and other controlling variables. Global Change Biology 9, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J. V.G., Hutcheon, J. A., Jordan, V. W.L. & Osborne, N. J. (1994). Evaluation of energy usage for machinery operations in the development of more environmentally benign farming systems. Aspects of Applied Biology 40, 87–91.Google Scholar
Edwards-Jones, G., Milà I Canals, L., Hounsome, N., Truninger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., Cross, P., York, E. H., Hospido, A., Plassmann, K., Harris, I. M., Edwards, R. T., Day, G. A. S., Tomos, A. D., Cowell, S. J. & Jones, D. L. (2008). Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science and Technology 19, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards-Jones, G., Plassmann, K. & Harris, I. M. (2009). Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales UK. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggels, P. G., Ansems, A. M. M. & Van Der Ven, B. L. (2001). Eco-efficiency of Recovery Scenarios of Plastic Packaging. TNO-report ref R 2000/119. Brussels, Belgium: Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe (APME).Google Scholar
Fealy, R. & Schrőder, J. J. (2008). Assessment of Manure Transport Distances and their Impact on Economic and Energy Costs. The International Fertiliser Society Proceedings 642. York, UK: The International Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Foster, C., Green, K., Bleda, M., Dewick, P., Evans, B., Flynn, A. & Mylan, J. (2006). Environmental Impacts of Food Production and Consumption. A Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by Manchester Business School. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
Garnett, T. (2006). Fruit and Vegetables and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Exploring the Relationship. Working paper produced as part of the work of the Food Climate Research Network. FCRN Working Paper 06-01 Rev. A. Guildford, UK: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Garnett, T. (2007). Food Refrigeration: What is the Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Emissions and How Might Emissions be Reduced? A Working Paper Produced as Part of the Food Climate Research Network. Guildford, UK: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Green, A., Tzilivakis, J. & Lewis, K. A. (2009). Chloropicrin. In Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB). Available online at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/Reports/148.htm (verified 20 May 2010).Google Scholar
Green, M. (1987). Energy in pesticide manufacture, distribution and use. In Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control (Ed. Helsel, Z. R.), pp. 165–177. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Green, R. J. (1980). Soil factors affecting survival of microsclerotia of Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology 70, 353–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, G. P. & Jones, C. I. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the ICE – Energy 161, 87–98.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. F. (1999). Strawberries. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Hülsbergen, K. J. & Kalk, W. D. (2001). Energy Balances in Different Agricultural Systems – Can they be Improved? The International Fertiliser Society Proceedings 476. York, UK: The International Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. (1995). Farm Power and Machinery Management, 9th edn.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, J., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. J., Keightly, S., Kerr, S. & Lewis, K. A. (2003). Investigation of Varietal Characteristics Required for Sustainable Agriculture. Final Report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Project VSO128. London: DEFRA/NIAB.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2006). ISO 14044:2006. Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. Brussels, Belgium: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006). 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme (Eds Eggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K.). Tokyo, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G., Perry, M. & Prior, J. (2007). The Climate of the United Kingdom and Recent Trends. Exeter, UK: Met Office Hadley Centre.Google Scholar
Jenssen, T. K. & Kongshaug, G. (2003). Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fertiliser Production. The International Fertiliser Society Proceedings 509. York, UK: The International Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Kaiser, E. A., Kohrs, K., Kuècke, M., Schnug, E., Heinemeyer, O. & Munch, J. C. (1998). Nitrous oxide release from arable soil: importance of N-fertilization, crops and temporal variation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 1553–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalk, W. D. & Hülsbergen, K. J. (1999). Dieselkraftstoffeinsatz in der Pflanzenproduktion. Landtechnik 54, 332–333.Google Scholar
Kaltschmitt, M. & Reinhardt, A. (1997). Nachwachsende Energieträger. Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung. Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg Verlag.Google Scholar
Lainsbury, M. A. (2009). UK Pesticides Guide 2009. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N., Measures, M. & Padel, S. (2004). Organic Farm Management Handbook, 6th edn. Aberystwyth, UK/Newbury, UK: University of Wales/Elm Farm Research Centre.Google Scholar
Liguori, G., Gugliuzza, G. & Inglese, P. (2009). Evaluating carbon fluxes in orange orchards in relation to planting density. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 637–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, O. (1980). The technology of peat. Ambio 9, 309–313.Google Scholar
Machefert, S. E., Dise, N. B., Goulding, K. W. T. & Whitehead, P. G. (2002). Nitrous oxide emission from a range of land uses across Europe. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 6, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maraseni, T. N., Mushtaq, S. & Maroulis, J. (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs: a cross-country assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (RB209). London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Milà I Canals, L., Cowell, S. J., Sim, S. & Basson, L. (2007). Comparing domestic versus imported apples: a focus on energy use. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 14, 338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moorby, J. M., Chadwick, D. R., Scholefield, D., Chambers, B. J. & Williams, J. R. (2007). A Review of Research to Identify Best Practice for Reducing Greenhouse Gases from Agriculture and Land Management. Final Report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) project AC0206 undertaken by the Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research. Aberystwyth/Wolverhapmton: IGER/ADAS.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Jenkins, G. J., Booth, B. B. B., Brown, C. C., Clark, R. T., Collins, M., Harris, G. R., Kendon, E. J., Betts, R. A., Brown, S. J., Humphrey, K. A., Mccarthy, M. P., McDonald, R. E., Stephens, A., Wallace, C., Warren, R., Wilby, R. & Wood, R. A. (2009). UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. Exeter, UK: Met Office Hadley Centre.Google Scholar
National Statistics and Department for Transport (2009). Table 1.13c: Average length of haul by commodity 1998–2008. In Transport Statistics Bulletin: Road Freight Statistics 2008 (Compiled by Hartley, R. & Reynolds, S.), p. 35. London: National Statistics and Department for Transport.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. (1980). Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Richards, I. R. (2001). The Fertiliser Directory. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Skopp, J., Jawson, M. D. & Doran, D. W. (1990). Steady state aerobic activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Science Society of America 54, 1619–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D. W., Bell, J. A., Hammond, K. J. & Whitehouse, A. B. (2002). The latest strawberry cultivars from Horticulture Research International. Acta Horticulturae 567, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. U., Bradbury, N. J. & Addiscott, T. M. (1996). SUNDIAL: a PC-based system for simulating nitrogen dynamics in arable land. Agronomy Journal 88, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talboys, P. W., Frick, E. L. & Davies, M. K. (1975). Duration of effects of benomyl on growth and wilt (Verticillum dahliae) development in the strawberry, cv. Cambridge Vigour, in relation to time of inoculation. Annals of Applied Biology 81, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Assured Produce Scheme (2009). Assured Produce Crop Specific Protocol: Strawberries (Crop ID: 31). London: Assured Food Standards.Google Scholar
The Carbon Trust. (2004). Energy and Carbon Conversions. Witney, UK: The Carbon Trust.Google Scholar
Tzilivakis, J., Jaggard, K., Lewis, K. A., May, M. & Warner, D. J. (2005 a). Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 107, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. J., May, M., Lewis, K. A. & Jaggard, K. (2005 b). An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Agricultural Systems 85, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, P., Brown, S. & McEwen, M. J. (2004). To Support the Development of Standards for Compost by Investigating the Benefits and Efficacy of Compost Use in Different Applications. Project Code: STA0015. Banbury, UK: The Waste and Resources Action Programme.Google Scholar
Wessex Water (2004). Striking the Balance. Bath, UK: Wessex Water Ltd.Google Scholar
Williams, A. G., Audsley, E. & Sandars, D. L. (2006). Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities. Final Report on DEFRA Research Project IS0205. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
Woolliams, G. E. (1966). Host range and symptomatology of Verticillium dahliae in economic, weed and native plants in interior British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 46, 661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar