Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:18:22.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotype X macro- and micro-environment interactions in barley populations (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. D. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
M. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
S. Chandra
Affiliation:
Project Director (Pulses) Regional Research Station, Indian Agriculture Research InstituteKanpur, India

Summary

Triple test cross progenies arising from F2 of three crosses, namely, C164 x EB1556 BG25 x NP21 and BH15 x RD103, were used for investigating their interactions with macro- and micro-environments for number of days to heading, plant height, number of tillers per plant, ear length, number of grains per ear, 100-grain weight and yield per plant in barley. The analysis indicated, in general, that the additive component of genetic variance was more sensitive to macro-environment than non-additive components. In order to have a more precise estimate of this component, an experiment repeated over a larger number of locations and years would be desirable. The ‘j and l’type of epistasis showed sensitivity equal to the dominance components in response to the change of soil conditions. Covariances between family means and variances were used to detect the interactions of genetic components with the micro-environmental differences. The additive and the dominance components showed sensitivity to microenvironmental changes and were not differentially affected by the adverse soil condition compared with normal soil. The additive gene effects were relatively more sensitive, indicating the probable superiority of heterozygotes over the corresponding homozygotes with regard to stability.

Amongst the three populations, the population resulting from BH15 x RD103 was found to be most sensitive. Although the genotype x environment interaction for a character was population-specific, number of grains per ear and yield per plant were invariably the most sensitive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, R. W.Bradshaw, A. D. (1964). Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Science 4, 503508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breese, E. L. (1969). The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interaction in grasses. Heredity 24, 2744.Google Scholar
Chandra, S. (1979). Relative estimates of general and specific combining estimates under normal and sodic soil condition in pearl millet cross. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 3538.Google Scholar
Jinks, J. L.Perkins, J. M. (1970).A general method for the detection of additive, dominance and epistatio components of variation. II. F 2 and back cross populations. Heredity 25, 419429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearsey, M. J.Jinks, J. L. (1968). A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23, 403409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, J. M.Jinks, J. L. (1971). Analysis of genotype x environment interaction in the triple test cross data. Heredity 26, 203209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooni, H. S., Jinks, J. L.Jayasekara, N. E. M. (1978). An investigation of gene action and genotype x environment interaction in two crosses of Nicotianarustica by triple test cross and inbred line analysis. Heredity 41, 8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. (1979). A study of genotype x environment interaction in three barley triple test crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 319321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. (1980). Detection of components of genetic variation and genotype x environment interaction in spring wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 6772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar