Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:43:49.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of date of planting, date of harvesting and seed rate on yield of seed potato crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. J. O'Brien  and
E. J. Allen
P. J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge, UK
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fourteen experiments which studied effects of date of planting in July, date of harvesting and seed rate on seed tuber yields (10–51 mm) of several potato varieties were carried out in four seasons in East Anglia. Seed tuber yields of c. 30 t/ha in Estima, Wilja and Maris Piper and 20 t/ha in Record were produced from the early planting and in all varieties c. 20 t/ha were produced from planting in late July. For maximum seed yield in all varieties, seed rates of 1·5–2 t/ha were sufficient for most harvests from both dates of planting but for the earliest harvest of the late-July planting, seed rates of only 1–1·5 t/ha were required. The value of seed crops was assessed as the number of ware hectares that could be replanted from the seed yield of one hectare graded 10–51 mm. In all varieties, the number of seed-size tubers and replantable hectares increased with increasing seed rate over most of the range, but numbers were close to the maximum at the early harvests. With delay in harvesting, the number of seed tubers and replantable hectares decreased in many experiments, especially from low seed rates, as more tubers exceeded the upper seed size limit. Maximum numbers of replantable hectares of 15, 15, 20 and 25 were found in Record, Estima, Wilja and Maris Piper, respectively.

The monetary value of seed crops of Record and Maris Piper was calculated using (i) a fixed price per tonne of seed and (ii) cost of seed per replantable ware hectare. Sale values from the latter were substantially higher than from the former at early harvests in Record and at all harvests in Maris Piper. In Record, differences in sale value between the two pricing methods decreased with delay in harvesting as yields increased while number of replantable hectares varied little. The results showed that high multiplication rates and monetary returns can be obtained from short-season seed potato crops which may follow crops harvested earlier in the same season. The implications for potato production in the UK are discussed.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 118 , Issue 3 , June 1992 , pp. 289 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. & O'Brien, S. A. (1987). An analysis of seed weight, seed rate and date of harvest on the yield and economic value of seed-potato crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J., O'Brien, P. J. & Firman, D. (1992). An evaluation of small seed for ware potato production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, G. A. (1987). Effects of irrigation and seed tuber size on yield and infection of potatoes from commercial and healthier seed stocks. Potato Research 30, 637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, R. H. (1977). An assessment of the value of different sizes of seed potatoes of maincrop varieties. Experimental Husbandry 32, 102–114.Google Scholar
Knutson, K. W. (1988). Implications of new technologies for seed potato certification programs and seed growers. American Potato Journal 65, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). Seed rate for potatoes grown as maincrop. Short Term Leaflet 653.Google Scholar
Potato Marketing Board (1986). Potato Statistics in Great Britain 1981–85, 23 pp.Google Scholar
Soil Survey of England and Wales (1984). Soils of England and Wales. Bulletin no. 11. Soil Survey Unit, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. & Fox, R. A. (1979). The development of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on the surface of the potato tuber. Potato Research 21, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E., Fellows, J. R., Sutherland, R. A. & Allen, E. J. (1990). Determination of optimum tuber planting density for production of tubers in processing ware grades in the potato variety Record. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar