Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:24:23.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of plane of nutrition on the performance and carcass characteristics of pigs slaughtered at 100 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Walker
Affiliation:
Crop and Animal Husbandry Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and Faculty of Agriculture, The Queen's University of Belfast
I. H. Heaney
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Pig Testing Station, Antrim
D. H. McNally
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland

Summary

Four equally spaced feeding levels, estimated to cover the range of commercial practice, were examined using a total of 208 pigs over the live-weight range 28–100 kg. The pigs were penned in groups of six or eight and were balanced for sex within pens. Three centres participated in the experiment contributing five, two and one replicates respectively.

Efficiency of feed conversion was not significantly affected over the range of feed intakes studied, thus daily gain was linearly related to feed intake. A 10 decrease in feed intake increased killing-out percentage by 0·3 unit and decreased backfat thickness by 1 mm at both the shoulder and mid rump. The corresponding changes in the percentages of subcutaneous fat plus skin and meat were similar in magnitude at approximately 0·85 unit.

Muscle quality was reduced with higher feed intakes but weight of liver, as increased. Details of other offal weights and carcass measurements are given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

, A.R.C. (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braotie, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1957). Comparison of six different levels of feeding for fattening pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 347–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Townsend, M. J., Harrington, G. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). A large-scale test of the effects of food restriction on the performance of fattening pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 51, 208–17.Google Scholar
Eddie, S. M. (1969). A study of growth and feed utilisation following a period of restricted feed intake in bacon pigs. Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. J. (1969). The relationship between the subjective and objective measurement of pork colour. J. Fd Technol. 4, 147–56.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., McDonald, I. & Fowler, V. R. (1964). The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcases of pigs and lambs when variations in fat content are excluded. Anim. Prod. 6, 141–54.Google Scholar
Harrington, G. (1958). Pig carcase evaluation. Tech. Comm. No. 12, C. A. B.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. & Calder, A. F. C. (1956). The response of different types of pigs to varying levels of feeding from weaning to bacon weight with particular reference to carcase quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47, 287323.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., McDonald, I. & Caider, A. F. C. (1960). Some further observations upon the effects of varying the plane of feeding for pigs between weaning and bacon weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54, 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N., Holme, D. W. & Forbes, T. J. (1968). The effect of rate of gain during the growing and finishing periods on the feed efficiency and carcass composition of the pig. Part II. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar