Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T07:11:50.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of dietary protein content on performance, feed efficiency and carcass traits of feedlot Nellore and Angus × Nellore cross cattle at different growth stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2018

P. M. Amaral
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
L. D. S. Mariz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil School of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Ademar de Barros St, 40170-110, Bahia, Brazil
D. Zanetti*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais, Machado-Paraguaçu Road, km 3, 37750-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil
L. F. Prados
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Rui Barbosa St, 14770-000, São Paulo, Brazil
M. I. Marcondes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
S. A. Santos
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Ademar de Barros St, 40170-110, Bahia, Brazil
E. Detmann
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
A. P. Faciola
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-0910, USA
S. C. Valadares Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, PH Rolfs St, 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: D. Zanetti, E-mail: diego.zanetti@ifsuldeminas.edu.br, diegozanetti_@hotmail.com

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate whether a reduction in dietary crude protein (CP) and genotype affects animal performance, feed efficiency and carcass traits of beef cattle at different stages of the feedlot. Twenty-two Nellore and 22 crossbred F1 Angus × Nellore (Nellore: 8 months, initial body weight (iBW) = 212.7 kg; Crossbred: 8 months, iBW = 226.1 kg) were used in this experiment. The experiment was conducted in a complete randomized design with six replicates, in a 2 × 3 factorial design. The factors were two genotypes (Nellore and Crossbred) and three CP concentrations (100, 120 and 140 g/kg dry matter [DM]). The experimental period lasted 224 day, being divided into two stages (Backgrounding = 112 day, and Finishing = 112 day). At the end of the experiment, all animals were slaughtered to evaluate their carcass characteristics. Similar patterns were observed during backgrounding and finishing phases on intake and average daily gain (ADG) regarding genotype. Intakes of DM, organic matter, CP, neutral detergent fibre, non-fibre carbohydrates and total digestible nutrients, ADG (kg/day) and feed efficiency were greater in Crossbred animals than Nellore in both phases. During the backgrounding phase, dietary CP did not influence DM intake. However, a linear effect of CP on ADG was observed in the backgrounding phase. During finishing, Nellore cattle fed 100 g CP/kg DM presented lower ADG than Nellore fed 120 and 140 g CP/kg DM. Crossbred animals were heavier than Nellore at the beginning and end of the trial. Crossbred animals also gained more carcass, retained more CP and fat, and had a greater subcutaneous fat thickness during the experiment compared with Nellore. There was a quadratic effect of dietary CP on retained CP and dressing. The current study found that crossbred animals (F1 Angus × Nellore) not only had greater performance, but also better carcass traits compared with Nellore, representing an option for increasing productivity. Also, it is possible to adjust diets according to phase. During the backgrounding stage, 140 g CP/kg DM should be used, being reduced to 120 g CP/kg DM during the finishing stage of feedlot for Nellore and to 100 g CP/kg DM for Crossbred, without affecting performance adversely.

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFRC (1993) Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Amaral, PM, Valadares Filho, SC, Detmann, E, Santos, SA, Prados, LF, Mariz, LDS, Alves, LC, Menezes, ACB, Villadiego, FAC, Novaes, MAS and Silva, FAS (2014) Effect of phase-feeding crude protein on performance and carcass characteristics of crossbred beef bulls: an application to reduce nitrogen compounds in beef cattle diets. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46, 419425.Google Scholar
AOAC (2006) Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis, 19th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
ARC (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Bach, A, Calsamiglia, S and Stern, MD (2005) Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 88(suppl. 1), E9E21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, PF (1998) Cruzamento industriais e a produção de novilhos precoces. In Cyrino, JEP, Menten, JFM, Lanna, DPD and Miyada, VS (eds). Simpósio sobre Producao Intensiva de Gado de Corte, Proceedings of Simpósio sobre Producao Intensiva de Gado de Corte. Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: CBNA, pp. 100114 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Broderick, GA (2003) Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 13701381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, NA, Greene, LW, McCollum, FT, Montgomery, T and McBride, K (2003) Influence of oscillating dietary crude protein concentration on performance, acid-base balance, and nitrogen excretion of steers. Journal of Animal Science 81, 26602668.Google Scholar
Detmann, E and Valadares Filho, SC (2010) On the estimation of non-fibrous carbohydrates in feeds and diets. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 62, 980984.Google Scholar
Dong, RL, Zhao, GY, Chai, LL and Beauchemin, KA (2014) Prediction of urinary and fecal nitrogen excretion by beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92, 46694681.Google Scholar
Doranalli, K, Penner, GB and Mutsvangwa, T (2011) Feeding oscillating dietary crude protein concentrations increases nitrogen utilization in growing lambs and this response is partly attributable to increased urea transfer to the rumen. The Journal of Nutrition 141, 560567.Google Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandez, TM and Van Soest, PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347358.Google Scholar
Marcondes, MI, Valadares Filho, SDC, Oliveira, IMD, Paulino, PVR, Valadares, RFD and Detmann, E (2011 a) Feed efficiency of pure and crossbred cattles fed high or low concentrate level. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 40, 13131324.Google Scholar
Marcondes, MI, Valadares Filho, SC, Oliveira, IM, Paulino, MF, Paulino, PVR, Detmann, E and Silva, LFC (2011 b) Energy requirements of Nellore purebred and crossbreed with Angus and Simmental. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 40, 872881.Google Scholar
Menezes, ACB, Valadares Filho, SC, Costa e Silva, LF, Pacheco, MVC, Pereira, JMV, Rotta, PP, Zanetti, D, Detmann, E, Silva, FAS, Godoi, LA and Rennó, LN (2016) Does a reduction in dietary crude protein content affect performance, nutrient requirements, nitrogen losses, and methane emissions in finishing Nellore bulls? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223, 239249.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR (2002) Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 12171240.Google ScholarPubMed
Niu, M, Appuhamy, JADRN, Leytem, AB, Dungan, RS and Kebreab, E (2016) Effect of dietary crude protein and forage contents on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from dairy cows simultaneously. Animal Production Science 56, 312321.Google Scholar
NRC (1987) Predicting Feed Intake of Food-producing Animals. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th revised edn. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, CA and Millen, DD (2014) Survey of the nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot cattle nutritionists in Brazil. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197, 6475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, J, Suzuki, T, Koike, S, Ueda, K, Kobayashi, Y, Tanaka, K and Okubo, M (2003) Effects of urea infused into the rumen on liquid-and particle-associated fibrolytic enzyme activities in steers fed low quality grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 104, 1327.Google Scholar
Robertson, IS, Paver, H and Wilson, JC (1970) Effect of castration and dietary protein level on growth and carcass composition in beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 299310.Google Scholar
Sathler, DFT, Prados, LF, Zanetti, D, Silva, BC, SC Filho, V, Pacheco, MVC, Amaral, PM, Rennó, LN and Paulino, MF (2017) Reducing mineral usage in feedlot diets for Nellore cattle: I. Impacts of calcium, phosphorus, copper, manganese, and zinc contents on microbial efficiency and ruminal, intestinal, and total digestibility of dietary constituents. Journal of Animal Science 95, 17151726.Google Scholar
Scholljegerdes, EJ, Hess, BW, Moss, GE, Hixon, DL and Rule, DC (2004) Influence of supplemental cracked high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds on site and extent of digestion in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82, 35773588.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ (1996) Effects of protein supplementation of grass silage on the performance and carcass quality of beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 403412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Marcondes, MI, Chizzotti, ML and Paulino, PVR (2010) Nutrient Requirements of Zebu Beef Cattle – BR-Corte, 2nd edn. Visconde do Rio Branco, Brazil: Suprema Gráfica e Editora.Google Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Machado, PAS, Furtado, T, Chizzotti, ML and Amaral, HF (2015) Brazilian Tables of Chemical Composition of Feeds for Ruminants. Viçosa, Brazil: Editora UFV. Available at http://cqbal.agropecuaria.ws/webcqbal/en/index.php (Accessed 22 November 2017).Google Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Costa e Silva, LF, Gionbelli, MP, Rotta, PP, Marcondes, MI, Chizzotti, ML and Prados, LF (2016) Nutrient Requirements of Zebu and Crossbred Cattle – BR-CORTE, 3rd edn. Visconde do Rio Branco, Brazil: Suprema Gráfica e Editora. Available at http://brcorte.com.br/en/ (Accessed 22 November 2017).Google Scholar
Valente, TNP, Detmann, E, Queiroz, ACD, Valadares Filho, SC, Gomes, DI and Figueiras, JF (2011) Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Brazilian Journal of Animal Sciences 40, 25652573.Google Scholar
Van Dung, D, Shang, W and Yao, W (2014) Effect of crude protein levels in concentrate and concentrate levels in diet on in vitro fermentation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27, 797805.Google Scholar