Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:17:47.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of cactus pear as a moistening additive in the production of rehydrated corn grain silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2022

D. M. Pereira*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
E. M. Santos
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
J. S. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
F. N. S. Santos
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, MA, Brazil
R. C. Lopes
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, MA, Brazil
M. A. C. Santos
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
Y. R. Corrêa
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
E. S. Justino
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
G. M. Leite
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
P. G. B. Gomes
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
G. F. L. Cruz
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil
P. C. Torres Júnior
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: D. M. Pereira, E-mail: danillomarte.zootec@gmail.com

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of cactus pear as a moistening additive on fermentative and microbiological characteristics, aerobic stability (AS), chemical composition and in situ rumen degradability of corn grain silage at different opening times. A completely randomized experimental design was adopted in a 4 × 3 factorial scheme with four levels of dry matter (DM) (50; 60; 70 and 80% of DM) and three opening times (30; 60 and 120 days after ensiling), with four replications. There was an effect of interaction (P < 0.05) between the DM levels and opening times on silage yeast population, effluent losses, gas losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), AS of the silage and on lactic acid bacteria, mould and yeast populations after AS trial. The 60% DM level presented DMR values above 930 g/kg of DM. However, the lowest AS time (96.52 h) was observed in silages with 60% DM at 60 days after ensiling, although all silages have shown high AS. The DM in situ degradability of the ensiled mass increased after the ensiling process at all DM levels and opening times, with the 60% DM content showing the best result. When using cactus pear as a corn grain moistening additive, the 60% DM level is recommended when the opening time is up 120 days.

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council – AFRC (1993) Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants: An Advisory Manual Prepared by AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Wallingford, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International, p. 159.Google Scholar
AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association Analytical Chemists, 18th Edn. Gaithersburg: AOAC.Google Scholar
Arcari, MA, Martins, CMDMR, Tomazi, T and dos Santos, MV (2016) Effect of the ensiling time of hydrated ground corn on silage composition and in situ starch degradability. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 53, 6071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ávila, CLS, Carvalho, BF, Pinto, JC, Duarte, WF and Schwan, RF (2014) The use of Lactobacillus species as starter cultures for enhancing the quality of sugar cane silage. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 940951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ávila, NRBD, Silva, NCD, Leite, RF, Barbosa, LDA, Florentino, LA and Rezende, AVD (2019) Caracterização da silagem de grão de milho reidratado associado ao resíduo de tilápia. Ciência Animal Brasileira 20, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuchat, LR (1981) Microbial stability as affected by water activity. Cereal Foods World 26, 345349.Google Scholar
Bolsen, KK, Lin, C, Brent, BE, Feyerherm, AM, Urban, JE and Aimutis, WR (1992) Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa and corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 30663083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, GSMS, Santos, EM, de Araújo, GGL, de Oliveira, JS, Zanine, AM, Perazzo, AF and Cavalcanti, HS (2020) Mixed silages of cactus pear and gliricidia: chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, microbial population and aerobic stability. Scientific Reports 10, 113.Google Scholar
Carvalho, BF, Ávila, CLS, Bernardes, TF, Pereira, MN, Santos, C and Schwan, RF (2017) Fermentation profile and identification of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts of rehydrated corn kernel silage. Journal of Applied Microbiology 122, 589600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corsato, CE, Scarpare Filho, JA and Sales, ECJD (2008) Teores de carboidratos em órgãos lenhosos do caquizeiro em clima tropical. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 30, 414418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, MRH, Jobim, CC, Neumann, M and Osmari, MP (2018 a) Corn grain processing improves chemical composition and fermentative profile of rehydrated silage. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 40, 4256442564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, NC, Nascimento, CF, Nascimento, FA, Resende, FD, Daniel, JLP and Siqueira, GR (2018 b) Fermentation and aerobic stability of rehydrated corn grain silage treated with different doses of Lactobacillus buchneri or a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 41584167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Silva, NC, Nascimento, CF, Campos, VM, Alves, MA, Resende, FD, Daniel, JL and Siqueira, GR (2019) Influence of storage length and inoculation with Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of high-moisture corn and rehydrated corn grain silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 251, 124133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, M, Gilles, KA, Hamilton, JK, Rebers, PT and Smith, F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobetti, STC, Neumann, M, Oliboni, R and Oliveira, MR (2013) Use of humid grains silage in the diet of ruminants. Ambiência 9, 225239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, G and Rodríguez, AA (2003) Effect of storage method on fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and forage intake of tropical grasses ensiled in round bales. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 926933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gusha, J, Katsande, S, Zvinorova, PI and Ncube, S (2013) The nutritional composition and acceptability of cacti (Opuntia ficus indica) legume mixed silage. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research 3, 116120.Google Scholar
Hoffman, PC, Esser, NM, Shaver, RD, Coblentz, WK, Scott, MP, Bodnar, AL and Charley, RC (2011) Influence of ensiling time and inoculation on alteration of the starch-protein matrix in high-moisture corn. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 24652474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jobim, CC, Nussio, LG, Reis, RA and Schmidt, P (2007) Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36, 101119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kung, L Jr., Robinson, JR, Ranjit, NK, Chen, JH, Golt, CM and Pesek, JD (2000) Microbial populations, fermentation end-products, and aerobic stability of corn silage treated with ammonia or a propionic acid-based preservative. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 14791486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kung, L Jr., Shaver, RD, Grant, RJ and Schmidt, RJ (2018) Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 40204033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macêdo, AJDS, Santos, EM, Araújo, GGLD, Edvan, RL, Oliveira, JSD, Perazzo, AF and Pereira, DM (2018) Silages in the form of diet based on spineless cactus and buffelgrass. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 35, 121129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P, Henderson, AR and Heron, SJE (1991) The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd Edn. Mallow, Bucks, UK: Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR (2002) Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 12171240.Google ScholarPubMed
Muck, RE, Nadeau, EMG, McAllister, TA, Contreras-Govea, FE, Santos, MC and Kung, L Jr. (2018) Silage review: recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 39804000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nocek, JE (1988) In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 20512069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, MDS, Araújo, GGL, Santos, EM, Gonzaga Neto, S, Oliveira, JS, Perazzo, AF and Pereira, DM (2019) Feed alternatives with cactus forage silage for animal nutrition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 22, 13931398.Google Scholar
Oliveira, ER, Takiya, CS, Del Valle, TA, Rennó, FP, Goes, RHT, Leite, RS and Da Silva, MSJ (2019) Effects of exogenous amylolytic enzymes on fermentation, nutritive value, and in vivo digestibility of rehydrated corn silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 251, 8695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, ER and McDonald, I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, GA, Santos, EM, Araújo, GGL, Oliveira, JS, Pinho, RMA, Zanine, ADM and Nascimento, TVC (2020) Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria in fresh plants and in silage from Opuntia and their effects on the fermentation and aerobic stability of silage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 157, 684692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezende, AV, Rabelo, CH, Veiga, RM, Andrade, LP, Härter, CJ, Rabelo, FH and Reis, RA (2014) Rehydration of corn grain with acid whey improves the silage quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197, 213221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, WCCS, Santos, EM, Oliveira, JS, de Araujo, GGL, Perazzo, AF, da Silva, AL and Leite, GM (2020) Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives. The Journal of Agricultural Science 158, 574582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampaio, IBM (1997) Métodos estatísticos aplicados à determinação de digestibilidade in situ. In Teixeira, JC (ed.), Digestibilidade em Ruminantes. Lavras: UFLA, pp. 165178.Google Scholar
Santos, EM, Pereira, OG, Garcia, R, Ferreira, CLLF, Oliveira, JS and Silva, TC (2014) Effect of regrowth interval and a microbial inoculant on the fermentation profile and dry matter recovery of guinea grass silages. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 44234432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, APMD, Santos, EM, Oliveira, JSD, Ribeiro, OL, Perazzo, AF, Martins, RMA and Pereira, GA (2018) Effects of urea addition on the fermentation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) silage. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 35, 5562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, FNS, Santos, EM, Oliveira, JS, Medeiros, GR, Zanine, AM, Araújo, GGL and Paulino, RS (2020) Fermentation profile, microbial populations, taxonomic diversity and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silages based on Cactus and Gliricidia. The Journal of Agricultural Science 158, 396405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, VP, Pereira, OG, Leandro, ES, Da Silva, TC, Ribeiro, KG, Mantovani, HC and Santos, SA (2016) Effects of lactic acid bacteria with bacteriocinogenic potential on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of alfalfa silage in tropical conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 18951902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sniffen, CJ, O'connor, JD, Van Soest, PJ, Fox, DG and Russell, JB (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70, 35623577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabacco, E, Piano, S, Cavallarin, L, Bernardes, TF and Borreani, G (2009) Clostridia spore formation during aerobic deterioration of maize and sorghum silages as influenced by Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum inoculants. Journal of Applied Microbiology 107, 16321641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabacco, E, Piano, S, Revello-Chion, A and Borreani, G (2011) Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri LN4637 and Lactobacillus buchneri LN40177 on the aerobic stability, fermentation products, and microbial populations of corn silage under farm conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 55895598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanine, ADM, Santos, EM, Dórea, JRR, Dantas, PADS, Silva, TCD and Pereira, OG (2010) Evaluation of elephant grass silage with the addition of cassava scrapings. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 26112616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar