Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:50:10.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The early weaning of pigs. VIII. Copper sulphate as a growth stimulant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. A. M. Lucas
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen
R. M. Livingstone
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen
A. W. Boyne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen
I. McDonald
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen

Extract

The effects of copper supplements on the performance up to 45 lb. live weight of early weaned pigs were measured in two experiments. Copper sulphate included as 0·1% of the diet had no apparent adverse effect on the piglets, even when it was introduced immediately after weaning at about 8 lb. live weight, but improved rate of gain by 6 and 12% and feed conversion efficiency by 5 and 6% in the two experiments, respectively. The length of the period of slow growth after weaning was reduced in both experiments. There was no clear advantage in delaying the introduction of the high-copper diet until the pigs weighed 17 or 26 lb.

The second experiment was a 2 x 2 factorial, the second factor being the presence or absence in the diet of antibiotic (present throughout in the first experiment). Antibiotic appeared to have slight beneficial effects on growth rate and feed conversion, which were additive to the effects of copper so that the best results were obtained from the diet containing both copper and antibiotic.

In a continuation of the first experiment it was found that the early copper treatment had no effect on rates of gain and feed conversion between 55 and 200 lb. live weight or on carcass measurements. The inclusion of a copper supplement in the diet from 55 to 200 lb. improved feed conversion by 4% and rate of gain by 3·5%, reduced the thickness of streak and increased the ratio of width to depth of eye muscle. None of these responses was affected by the copper treatment prior to 55 lb. live weight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1960). Brit. J. Nutr. 14, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Cassidy, J. (1955). Chem. & Ind. p. 601.Google Scholar
Bellis, D. (1958). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Blair, R. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 373.Google Scholar
Bunch, R. J., Speer, V. C. & Hays, V. W. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1252 P.Google Scholar
Calder, A. F. C., Lodge, G. A. & Blair, R. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 130.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. & Calder, A. F. C. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 184.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Livingstone, R. M. & McDonald, I. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 111.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., McDonald, I. & Calder, A. F. C. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrey, D. E., Miller, E. R., Thompson, O. A., Zutant, C. L., Schmidt, D. A., Ritchie, H. D., Hoefer, J. A. & Lueke, R. W. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1928 P.Google Scholar