Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:33:53.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestion of bacterial mucopeptide constituents in the sheep: 2. The digestion of muramic acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. C. Mason  and
G. Milne
V. C. Mason
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
G. Milne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

1. In experiments with four lambs cannulated in the abomasum and terminal ileum the amounts of muramic acid, diaminopimelic acid and α-amino nitrogen passing through the abomasum, terminal ileum and rectum were compared. While the concentration of muramic acid and diaminopimelic acid was higher in the ileal than in the duodenal dry matter, the ratio of muramic acid to diaminopimelic acid remained fairly constant at about 1·00:0·86 on a molar basis.

2. There was a very significant net absorption of α-amino nitrogen between the abomasum and terminal ileum, but no net absorption of muramic acid between these points. However, less muramic acid passed out of the rectum than passed through the terminal ileum.

3. It was concluded that in the normal sheep bacterial mucopeptide synthesized in the rumen is not digested in the small intestine, but is extensively degraded by bacteria in the caecum and colon.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , August 1971 , pp. 99 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, A. C. & Perkins, H. R. (1960). Presence of coll walls like those of bacteria in Biokettsiae. Nature, Lond. 188, 796–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, H., Lefort, M. & Martin, H. H. (1962). Chemical analysis of a mucopolymer component in cell walls of the blue-green alga Phormidium uncinatum. Biochem. biophys. Rcs. Comm. 7, 322—5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutton, K., Bailey, F. J. & Annison, E. F. (1971). Measurement of the bacterial nitrogen entering the duodenum of the ruminant using diaminopimelic acid as a marker. Br. J. Nutr. 25, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levvy, G. A. & McAllan, A. (1959). The N-acetylation and estimation of hexosamines. Biochem. J. 73, 127–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, V. C. (1969). Some observations on the distribution and origin of nitrogen in sheep faeces. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. & White, F. (1971). The digestion of bacterial mucopeptide constituents in the sheep. 1. The metabolism of 2, 6-diaminopimelic acid. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ØRskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & Kay, R. N. B. (1969). Dietary factors influencing the digestion of starch in the rumen and small and large intestine of early weaned lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 23, 217–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purser, D. B. & Buechler, S. M. (1966). Amino acid composition of rumen organisms. J. Dairy Sci. 49, 81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salton, M. B. J. (1960). Studies of the bacterial cell wall. VII. Monosaccharide constituents of the walls of gram-negative bacteria. Biochim. biophys. Acta, 45, 364–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salton, M. R. J. (1964). The Bacterial Cell Wall. Amsterdam, London and New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Strange, R. E. & Dark, F. A. (1956). An unidentified amino-sugar present in cell walls of spores of various bacteria. Nature, Lond. 177, 186–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, R. E. & Kent, L. H. (1959). The isolation, characterization and chemical synthesis of muramic acid. Biochem. J. 71, 333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Synge, R. L. M. (1953). Note on the occurrence of diaminopimelic acid in some intestinal micro-organisms from farm animals. J. gen. Microbiol. 9, 407–9.Google ScholarPubMed