Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:03:26.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Copper sulphate and antibiotics as feed additives for early weaned pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. M. Livingstone  and
D. M. S. Livingston
R. M. Livingstone
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
D. M. S. Livingston
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Citric acid and three antibiotic-type substances—zinc bacitracin, tylosin and formosulphathiazole—were included in dry-meal diets for early weaned pigs up to 20 kg live weight. Two experiments were carried out and in each copper sulphate as 0.1 % of the diet was tested.

In the first experiment the diets were supplemented with citric acid, copper sulphate or both citric acid and copper. The pigs given the diet containing both citric acid and copper tended to have the greatest daily live-weight gains and there was a similar trend in favour of the diet containing copper sulphate alone, but these advantages did not reach significance.

In the second experiment diets with or without copper sulphate were supplemented with either Zinc Bacitracin, Tylosin or formosulphathiazole. All three ‘antibiotics’ had beneficial effects on rates of gain and feed-conversion efficiency, resulting in average. increases of 15% and 10% respectively. Copper sulphate did not improve the performance of the pigs when included in the basal diet with or without an ‘antibiotic’ and there was no interaction between the copper supplement and any of the other supplements.

The performance of the pigs after 20 kg live weight under standard conditions showed little evidence in these experiments that the beneficial effects of feed additive use before this weight persisted during growth to 90 kg live weight or that any of the major measures of carcass quality were affected by the early treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 419 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braude, R. (1967). Copper as a stimulant in pig feeding (cuprum pro peounia). Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 3, 69–81.Google Scholar
Buck, S. F., Harrington, G. & Johnson, R. F. (1962). The prediction of lean percentage of pigs of bacon weight from carcass measurements. Anim. Prod. 4, 25–36.Google Scholar
Calder, A. F. C, Lodge, G. A. & Blair, R. (1959). The early weaning of pigs. V. The inclusion of digestive enzymes and antibiotics in diets for pigs weaned at 6–7 lb live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Calder, A. F. C. & Smith, H. (1959). The early weaning of pigs. IV. Comparisons of levels of antibiotic and sources of protein in diets for pigs weaned at 9 lb live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Livingstone, R. M., Boyne, A. W. & Mcdonald, I. (1962). The early weaning of pigs. VIII. Copper sulphate as a growth stimulant. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. & Lucas, I. A. M. (1956). The early weaning of pigs. I. The effect upon growth of variations in the protein, fat, sucrose, antibiotic, vitamin and mineral contents of diets for pigs of 8–25 lb live weight and a comparison of wet and dry feeding. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 220–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. & Lucas, I. A. M. (1957). The early weaning of pigs. II. The performance up to 56 days of age of pigs weaned at 8,14 and 20 lb live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 405–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. & Lucas, I. A. M. (1957). The early weaning of pigs. III. The influence of protein supply during two stages of growth on the performance of pigs from 9 lb to bacon weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar