Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:48:37.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the effects of potassium fertilizer on the yield, potassium content and quality of 22 different vegetable and agricultural crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. Greenwood ,
T. J. Cleaver ,
Mary K. Turner ,
J. Hunt ,
K. B. Niendorf  and
S. M. H. Loquens
D. J. Greenwood
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
T. J. Cleaver
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
Mary K. Turner
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
J. Hunt
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
K. B. Niendorf
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
S. M. H. Loquens
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sixty-one experiments with 15 levels of K fertilizer in the presence of excess N and P fertilizer were carried out on adjacent sites of the same field. Yield was always related to level of K fertilizer by a ‘diminishing returns’ type curve, and a derived equation, which defined relative responsiveness in terms of a single parameter, fitted the data for each crop very satisfactorily. Although the responsiveness of many of the crops was similar there were marked differences and the optimum levels of K (defined as the level at which a further 10 kg/ha increased yield by 1%) varied from 0 to 360 kg/ha, depending on the crop. Responsiveness was largely independent of the plant family to which the crop belonged, but was related to the mean plant weight atharvest; the larger the weight the less reponsive the crop. No general relation existed between responsiveness and duration of growth.

The % K in the dry matter of leaves (including stems) at harvest of crops receiving the optimum levels of K fertilizer was mainly determined by the family. It was generally between 0·9 and 1·1 for the Amaryllidaceae, between 1·1 and 1·2 for the Leguminosae and between 1·9 and 2·5% for the Cruciferae. The difference between the % K in the dry matter with the optimum level of K fertilizer and that with no fertilizer was proportional to responsiveness. Percentage K at harvest was a good indicator of the extent to which crop growth was restricted by lack of potassium.

At harvest crops receiving the optimum levels of K fertilizer contained between 29 and 220 kg/ha of K, but uptake increased asymptotically to a maximum as K applications were raised to higher levels. Maximum uptake for nearly all crops was almost double the uptake with the optimum fertilizer application.

Percentage recovery of 100 kg/ha of added K fertilizer varied between 8 and 70%, roughly in proportion to the total crop dry weight, which varied between 1 and 15 t/ha.

Effects of level of K fertilizer on crop quality were also measured and over the practical range of applications the effects were generally small.

The differences between the K requirements of crops are discussed and it is argued that the responsiveness of one crop relative to that of another would be expected to be similar on a range of soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 441 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, C. J. & Ozanne, P. G. (1967). Growth and potassium content of plants in solution cultures maintained at constant potassium concentrations. Soil Science 103, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, G. E. (1925). Plant yield and the intensity of external factors. Mitscherlich's ‘Wirkungsgesetz’. Annals of Botany 39, 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaver, T. J., Greenwood, D. J. & Wood, J. T. (1970). Systematically arranged fertilizer experiments. Journal of Horticultural Science 45, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, E. M. & Yates, F. (1941). Fertilizer policy in war-time: the fertilizer requirements of arable crops. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 9, 77–97.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Cleaver, T. J., Loquens, S. M. H. & Niendorf, K. B. (1977). Relationship between plant weight and growing period for vegetable crops in the United Kingdom. Annals of Botany 41, 987–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Cleaver, T. J. & Turner, M. K. (1974). Fertilizer requirements of vegetable crops. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society, London 145, 3–30.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Wood, J. T., Cleaver, T. J. & Hunt, J. (1971). A theory for fertilizer response. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F. & Cleaver, T. J. (1964). Growth and mineral composition of vegetable seedlings. Journal of Horticultural Science 39, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F., Cleaver, T. J. & Bray, J. M. (1966 a). The effects of different manurial treatments on the yield and mineral composition of early potatoes. Journal of Horticultural Science 41, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F., Cleaver, T. J. & Bray, J. M. (1966 b). The effects of different manurial treatments on the yield and mineral composition of red beet. Journal of Horticultural Science 41, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F., Cleaver, T. J. & Bray, J. M. (1966 c). The effects of different manurial treatments on the yield and mineral composition of carrots. Journal of Horticultural Science 41, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F., Cleaver, T. J. & Bray, J. M. (1967). The effects of different manurial treatments on the yield and mineral composition of spring cabbage. Journal of Horticultural Science 42, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengel, D. B. & Barber, S. A. (1974). Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agronomy Journal 66, 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1973). Fertilizer recommendations for agricultural and horticultural crops. Bulletin 209. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). General laboratory services booklet No. 2. Lime and fertilizer recommendations for vegetables and bulbs based on soil analysis. SBN 11 2405096. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. (1968). Processes in the root environment. Journal of Soil Science 19, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaife, M. A. & Barnes, A. (1977). The relationship between crop yield and petiole nitrate concentration at various growth stages. Plant and Soil 46, 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornley, J. H. M. (1978). Crop response to fertilizer. Annals of Botany 42, 817–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, H. B. Jr (1970). The leaching of substances from plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 21, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, A. & Hills, F. J. (1967). Principles and practices of plant analysis. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Plant Analysis Part II (ed. Viets, F. G.), pp. 11–24. Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1967). Results of an experiment at Woburn testing farmyard manure and N, P and K fertilizers on five arable crops and a long ley. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Cooke, G. W. (1963). Results of an experiment at Rothamsted testing farmyard manure and N, P and K fertilizer on five arable crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 60, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. T., Greenwood, D. J. & Cleaver, T. J. (1972). Interactions between the beneficial effects of nitrogen phosphate and potassium on plant growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar