Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:35:21.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the body composition and efficiency of mature sheep during loss and regain of live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Keenan ,
W. R. McManus  and
M. Freer
D. M. Keenan
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, University of New South Wales
W. R. McManus
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, University of New South Wales
M. Freer
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The body composition of eight Merino wethers was estimated from the tritiated water (TOH) space and live weight at intervals during a cross-over experiment in which they were fed to either maintain a uniform live weight (about 34 kg) or to lose and, later, recover live weight over a 17-week period. The diet was a pelleted mixture of lucerne and wheat.

The multiple regression equations used for these estimates were established from the chemical analysis of 24 sheep, including six from the cross-over experiment, which were killed at intervals during these two feeding regimens. The inclusion of TOH space in addition to live weight in the regression equations decreased the standard error of the estimates of body water, fat and energy by two-thirds. Correction of TOH space and live weight for gut water did not increase the precision of the equations.

Shoop which ate, during the first 4 weeks of the experiment, one-third of the amount of food required to maintain their original live weight, lost 16% of their weight and 30% of their total body energy. This weight loss consisted of 45% water, 39% fat and 13% protein. It appeared that tissue was mobilized inefficiently to meet a sudden energy deficit.

When food was offered ad lib. to these sheep after they had maintained a liveweight deficit of about 11 kg for 8 weeks, they regained their weight in 5 weeks but only 75% of their energy deficit. This was due to the high content of water (60%) and low content of fat (23%) in the regained tissue.

The sheep that lost weight and then recovered it were, over-all, about 86% as efficient in their use of food to maintain body energy and produce wool as the sheep that maintained their original weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albrink, M. J. & Neuwirth, R. S. (1960). Effect of previous starvation on response of plasma lipids and free fatty acids to a fat meal. J. clin. Invest. 39, 441–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beames, R. M. & Morris, J. G. (1965). Effect of salt/urea blocks on body-weight, body composition and wool production of sheep fed low protein native grass hay. Qd J. agric. Sci. 22, 369–79.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Boling, E. A. (1963). Determination of K42, Na24, Br82 and tritiated water concentration in man. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 110, 246–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. (1966). The effect of nutritional stress and recovery on the body composition of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 7, 168–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, A. M. & Lyne, A. G. (1961). Studies on rate of wool growth using (35S) cystine. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 14, 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1966). In Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grande, F., Anderson, J. T. & Keys, A. (1958). Changes of basal metabolic rate in man in semistarvation and refeeding. J. appl. Physiol. 12, 230–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hight, G. K. & Barton, R. A. (1965). The effect of undernutrition and realimentation on the Romney ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekwick, A. & Pawan, G. L. S. (1964). The effect of high fat and high carbohydrate diets on rates of weight loss in mice. Metabolism 13, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. H. & Clawson, W. J. (1964). Undernutrition and subsequent realimentation in rats and sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. C. & Mora, K. W. (1964). Methods of determining the chemical composition of dead animals. Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals. Ed. Tribe, D. E.. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. (1963). Body composition in vivo. III. The composition of living ruminants and its relation to tritiated water spaces. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 944–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. (1964). Body composition in vivo. VI. The composition of ewes during prolonged undernutrition. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 771–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1948). The effect of supermaintenance and submaintenance diets on mature Border Leicester-Cheviot ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. & Whitfeld, P. R. (1967). Ribonucleic acid synthesizing activity of spinach chloroplasts and nuclei. Archs. Biochem. Biophys. 121, 336–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, D. (1963). Fatty acid mobilization—mechanisms of regulation and metabolic consequences. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 24, 111–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Till, A. R. & Downes, A. M. (1963). A metabolism cage for sheep. Lab. Pract. 12, 1006–9.Google Scholar
Williams, A. J. & Winston, R. J. (1965). Relative efficiencies of conversion of feed to wool at three levels of nutrition in flocks genetically different in wool production. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 5, 390–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Osbourn, D. F. (1960). Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. 35, 324–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed