Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T11:32:08.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carcass, soft tissue and bone composition of early and late maturing steers fed two diets in two housing types and serially slaughtered over a wide weight range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Y. M. Nour  and
M. L. Thonney
A. Y. M. Nour
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–4801, U.S.A.
M. L. Thonney
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–4801, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seventy-one small-framed Angus and seventy-four Holstein steers were chosen to represent small and large mature types in a study designed to provide quantitative information on the effect of breed, diet and housing type on composition of carcasses from cattle slaughtered serially over a wide weight range. Within breed, steers were individually fed ad libitum either a maize-grain or a maize-silage diet and assigned randomly to one of two housing types. The effects of treatments on response variables with increasing carcass weight were tested by covariance analysis.

The rate of change of soft tissue chemical composition with increasing carcass weight was not influenced by diet, breed mature size or housing type except for ash which decreased at a faster rate in Angus than in Holstein steers. Percentages of water, protein and ash decreased while lipid increased with increasing carcass weight. At any carcass weight, Angus had more lipid and less water in soft tissue. Percentages of soft tissue protein and ash were affected by diet within breed. The energy content of soft tissue increased with weight and was affected only by breed. Angus soft tissue had more energy than that of Holsteins. Similar results were obtained when the entire carcass was analysed.

Cattle fed grain had slightly more water and less ash in bone than cattle fed silage. Angus steers had more protein and ash in bone than Holsteins. Although there was a diet × breed × housing type interaction for lipid content of bone, Holstein bone had higher lipid content than Angus bone for either diet or type of housing. All percentages of chemical components in bone, except water, increased with increasing carcass weight.

The experiment showed that large mature-size breeds have the ability to transform a high-energy diet into protein for human consumption. The percentage changes in ash, protein and lipid with increasing carcass weight appeared to follow a pattern of development similar to bone, muscle and fat, respectively, suggesting that Hammond's theory of differential growth holds also for chemical components of bovine carcasses. Bone chemical components, however, had a slightly different developmental pattern. The quantitative information on bone presented herein could be used to exploit bone as a source of human food, dietary supplements and products for bone remodelling surgery.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 345 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, N. J. & Smith, G. C. (1979). The effect of frame size and muscling on performance and carcass characteristics. Proceedings of the Western Section of American Society of Animal Science 30, 80.Google Scholar
Anon, . (1981). Bone remodeling surgery. Newsweek, 05.Google Scholar
Anrique, R. (1976). Body composition and efficiency of cattle as related to body type, size and sex. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Armbrustbr, G., Nour, A. Y. M., Thonney, M. L. & Stouffer, J. R. (1983). Changes in cooking losses and sensory attributes of Angus and Holsteins with increasing carcass weight, marbling, score or longissimus ether extract. Journal of Food Science 48, 835–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th edn. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Behnke, U., Ackerman, E. & Ruttolff, H. (1984). Preparation and utilization of enzymatic protein hydrolysates of bone scrap residue from mechanical fleshing assemblies. I. Studies on enzymatic hydrolysis of beef bone scrap. Die Nahrung 28, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1968). Growth paterns of bovine muscle, fat and bone. Journal of Animal Science 21, 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterheld, R. M. (1976). New Concepts of Cattle Growth, pp. 24–43. Sydney: University of Sydney Press.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Walters, L. E. (1983). The meat animal, changes and challenges. Journal of Animal Science 57 (Supplement 2), 136–146.Google Scholar
Bond, J., Warwick, E. J., Oltjen, R. R., Putman, P. A., Hiner, R. L., Kotula, A. W. & Weinland, B. T. (1982). Effects of feeding level on growth, composition of gain, carcass quality and mature body size in steers at ages up to six years. Growth 46, 388–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Callow, E. H. (1961). Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouse, J. D. & Dikeman, M. E. (1974). Methods of estimating beef chemical composition. Journal of Animal Science 38, 1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouse, J. D., Dikeman, M. E., Allen, M. D. & Murphey, C. E. (1974). Prediction of feeder calf performance and subsequent carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 38, 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N. K. & Smith, H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Drew, K. R. (1971). Some effects of weight loss and compensatory growth on the whole body and carcass composition of sheep. Ph.D. thesis, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ferrell, C. L., Kohlmeier, R. H., Crouse, J. D. & Glimp, H. (1978). Influence of dietary energy, protein and biological type of steer upon rate of gain and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 46, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, R. A., Riley, M. L., Mello, F. C., Corbridqe, M. H. & Kotula, A. W. (1974). Bone composition in cattle, pigs, sheep and poultry. Journal of Animal Science 39, 493–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortin, A. (1977). Chemical, physical, cellular, hormonal changes during the growth of Holstein and Angus cattle. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Fortin, A., Simpfendorfer, S., Reid, J. T., Ayala, H. J., Anrique, R. & Kertz, A. F. (1980). Effect of level of intake and influence of breed and sex on chemical composition of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 51, 604–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, V. R. (1974). The nutritional control of growth. In Meat Animals and Productivity (ed. Lister, D., Rhodes, D. N., Fowler, V. R. and Fuller, M. F.), pp. 285–299. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Fursey, G. A. J. (1975). A note on the density of bovine limb bones. Animal Production 21, 195–198.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Least Squares Analysis of Data with Unequal Subclass Numbers. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service 20–8.Google Scholar
Harwin, G. O., Brinks, J. S. & Stonaker, H. H. (1966). Genetic and environmental interactions affecting weaning weight of Hereford calves. Journal of Animal Science 25, 779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, H. B., Krause, G. F., Ellersieck, N. R., Epley, R. J., Riley, J. C. & Thompson, G. B. (1981). Beef carcass composition as influenced by yield and quality grade. Journal of Animal Science 53, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. D. M., Price, M. A. & Berg, R. T. (1978). Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle and bone in young bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Chadwick, J. P. & Charles, D. D. (1986). Estimation of the carcass composition of different cattle breeds and crosses from fatness measurements and visual assessments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. & Southgate, J. R. (1984). Beef breed comparisons in the U.K. Livestock Production Science 11, 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosterman, E. W., Sanford, L. G. & Parker, C. F. (1968). Effect of cow size and condition and ration protein content upon maintenance requirements of mature beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 27, 242–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kress, D. D., England, B. G., Hauser, E. R. & Chapman, A. B. (1971). Genetic environmental interactions in identical and fraternal twin beef cattle. II. Feed efficiency, reproductive performance, conformation score and fat thickness. Journal of Animal Science 33, 1186–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krol, B., Moerman, P. C. & Wassenberg, A. (1980). Nutritional and quality marking of meat products. Proceedings of the 26th European Meeting for Meat Research Workers. Vol. 1, pp. 331–332. Colorado Springs, 8–10 08. Chicago, Illinois: American Meat Science Association.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. J., Dikeman, M. G. & Schalles, R. R. (1978). Carcass composition of different cattle types related to energy efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 46, 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. A., Hembree, T. R. & Ramsey, C. B. (1980). Visual scores for muscle and trimness of feeder cattle as predictors of subsequent feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 51 (Supplement 1), 150.Google Scholar
Maiga, A. M. (1974). Physical and chemical composition of the carcass of the domestic bovine as influenced by breed, sex, level of feed intake and stage of growth. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Marchello, J. A. & Ochoa, M. F. (1982). Comparison of the chemical composition of the left and right sides of beef carcass. Journal of Animal Science 55 (Supplement 1), 247–248.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R. (1923). Age and chemical development in mammals. Journal of Biological Chemistry 57, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhoty, H. & Berg, R. T. (1971). Influence of breed and sex on the allometric growth patterns of major bovine tissues. Animal Production 13, 219–227.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. & Winter, W. H. (1974). Effects of three different growth rates on empty body weight carcass and dissected carcass composition of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. & Winter, W. H. (1975). The effects of three different growth rates on the chemical composition of the dressed carcass of cattle and the relationship between chemical and dissected components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nour, A. Y. M. (1982). Bovine carcass characteristics: quality, yield, palatability, chemical composition and mineral profile of early and late maturing breeds of cattle fed two diets in two locations and serially slaughtered over a wide weight range. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Nour, A. Y. M., Tuonney, M. L., Stouffer, J. R., & White, W. R. C. Jr, (1981). Muscle, fat and bone in serially slaughtered dairy or small beef cattle fed corn or corn silage diets in one of two locations. Journal of Animal Science 52, 512–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nour, A. Y. M., Thonney, M. L., Stouffer, J. R., & White, W. R. C. Jr, (1983). Changes in carcass weight and characteristics with increasing weight of large and small cattle. Journal of Animal Science 57, 1154–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, R. L., Kohlmier, R. H., Cundiff, L. V., Dikeman, M. E. & Crouse, J. D. (1977). Influence of dietary energy and protein in growth composition in different biological types of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 45, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchas, R. W. & Davies, H. L. (1974). Carcass and meat quality of Friesian steers fed on pasture or barley. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, R. V., Garret, W. N., Hinman, H. & East, N. E. (1974). Effects of nutrition, pregnancy and age on the composition of wool free, ingesta free body and carcass of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 39, 687–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1971). The effects of nutrition on the body composition of animals. Proceedings of the Georgia Nutritional Conference 26, 1–12.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H., Wellington, G. H. & Wood, J. D. (1968). Changes in body composition and meat characteristics accompanying growth. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference, pp. 18–37.Google Scholar
Robelin, J., Geay, Y. & Beranoer, C. (1979). Changes in body composition of Limousin bulls between 9 and 19 months of age. 2. Chemical composition and calorific value. Annales de Zootechnie 28, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1968). Developmental studies of body composition. Animal Breeding Abstracts 36, 167–181.Google Scholar
Simpfendorfer, S. (1974). Relationship of body type, size, sex and energy intake to body composition of cattle. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. D., Dolezal, H. G., Williams, F. L Jr, Bowling, R. A. & Taylor, R. E. (1986). Effects of feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness on subsequent growth and carcass development. II. Absolute growth and associated changes in carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 62, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatum, J. D., Smith, G. C, Murphey, C. E., Carpenter, Z. L. & Schake, L. M. (1982). Feeder cattle frame size, muscle thickness and subsequent beef carcass characteristics. Meat Science 6, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theriez, M., Tissier, M. & Robelin, J. (1981). The chemical composition of the intensively fed lamb. Animal Production 32, 29–37.Google Scholar
Thiessen, R. B. & Taylor, St. C. S. (1986). Genetic variability among cattle breeds for beef production. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. IX. Breeding programs for dairy and. beef cattle, water buffalo, sheep and goats, pp. 261–270.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Heide, E. K., Duhaime, D. J., Nour, A. Y. M. & Oltenacu, P. A. (1981). Growth and feed efficiency of cattle of different mature sizes. Journal of Animal Science 53, 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Lang, C. P. & Tulloh, N. M. (1976). A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Wood, J. D. & Macfie, H. J. H. (1983). Fat deposition in Hereford and Friesian steers. 1. Body composition and partitioning of fat between depots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1963). Carcass composition of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Symposium on Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 5–16. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E., Wagner, D. G., Walters, L. E., Horn, G. W., Waller, G. R., Sims, P. L. & Guenther, J. J. (1983). Effect of production systems on performance, body composition and lipid and mineral profiles of soft tissue in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 57, 1020–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M., Edey, T. N. & Hill, M. K. (1975). Animal Science, pp. 222–239. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar