Skip to main content Accessibility help

Benefits of participatory plant breeding (PPB) as exemplified by the first-ever officially released PPB-bred sweet potato cultivar

  • R. W. GIBSON (a1), I. MPEMBE (a2) and R. O. M. MWANGA (a2)


NASPOT 11 is a recently released sweet potato cultivar, bred by participatory plant breeding (PPB) in Uganda. It is already grown extensively by farmers who call it Tomulabula. In on-farm and on-station yield trials, Tomulabula yielded as well as the researcher-bred variety NASPOT 1 and sometimes more than the local landraces Dimbuka and New Kawogo, which have also been released. Farmers were asked to what extent Tomulabula, NASPOT 1 (the most popular station-bred cultivar in Uganda) and the local indigenously bred cultivar they were currently growing satisfied 52 attributes previously identified by farmers as beneficial in sweet potato. Those cultivars whose breeding involved farmers (Tomulabula and the local cultivar) were perceived mostly to satisfy a broad range of attributes (i.e. had few ‘Very Bad’ scores) while those which involved researchers (Tomulabula and NASPOT 1) were the most frequently rated as ‘Very Good’ for specific attributes. Instances were observed and accounts given of how Tomulabula is sold at a premium and how it had improved farmers’ lives. These outcomes are attributed to PPB combining the strengths of farmers and researchers. The involvement of the Ugandan National Sweetpotato Program (UNSP) ensures that planting material will be conserved and also available in adequate amounts for official distribution.


Corresponding author

*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email:


Hide All
Almekinders, C. J. M., Thiele, G. & Danial, D. L. (2007). Can cultivars from participatory plant breeding improve seed provision to small-scale farmers. Euphytica 153, 363372.
Baidu-Forson, J. (1997). On-station farmers participatory varietal evaluation: a strategy for client-oriented breeding. Experimental Agriculture 33, 4350.
Banziger, M. & Cooper, M. (2001). Breeding for low input conditions and consequences for participatory plant breeding: examples from tropical maize and wheat. Euphytica 122, 503519.
Bashaasha, B., Mwanga, R. O. M., Ocitti P'obwoya, C. & Ewell, P. T. (1995). Sweetpotato in the Farming and Food Systems of Uganda: a Farm Survey Report. Nairobi, Kenya & Kampala, Uganda: International Potato Center & National Agricultural Research Organisation.
Belay, G. (2009). Does client-oriented plant breeding work? CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 4, 17.
Bishaw, Z. & Turner, M. (2008). Linking participatory plant breeding to the seed supply system. Euphytica 163, 3144.
Brennan, J. P. & Morris, M. L. (2001). Economic issues in assessing the role of physiology in wheat breeding programs. In Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding (Eds Reynolds, M. P., Ortis-Monasterio, J. I. & McNab, A.), pp. 7886. Mexico: CIMMYT.
Ceccarelli, S. (1994). Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 77, 205219.
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Maatougui, M., Michael, M., Slash, M., Haghparast, R., Rahmanian, M., Taheri, A., Al-Yassin, A., Benbelkacem, A., Labdi, M., Mimoun, H. & Nachit, M. (2010). Plant breeding and climate changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 627637.
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Singh, M., Michael, M., Shikho, A., Al Issa, M., Al Saleh, A., Kaleonjy, G., Al Ghanem, S. M., Al Hassan, A. L., Dalla, H., Basha, S. & Basha, T. (2003). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. II. Response to selection. Euphytica 133, 185200.
Dawson, J. C., Murphy, K. M. & Jones, S. S. (2008). Decentralized selection and participatory approaches in plant breeding for low-input systems. Euphytica 160, 143154.
Defoer, T., Kamara, A. & De Groote, H. (1997). Gender and variety selection: farmers’ assessment of local maize varieties in southern Mali. African Crop Science Journal 5, 6576.
Gibson, R. W., Byamukama, E., Mpembe, I., Kayongo, J. & Mwanga, R. O. M. (2008). Working with farmer groups in Uganda to develop new sweet potato cultivars: decentralisation and building on traditional approaches. Euphytica 159, 217228.
Gibson, R. W., Jeremiah, S. C., Aritua, V., Msabaha, R. P., Mpembe, I. & Ndunguru, J. (2000). Sweet potato virus disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence that neglect of seedlings in the traditional farming system hinders the development of superior resistant landraces. Journal of Phytopathology 148, 441447.
Haugerud, A. & Collinson, M. P. (1990). Plants, genes and people: improving the relevance of plant breeding in Africa. Experimental Agriculture 26, 341362.
Joshi, K. D., Sthapit, B. R. & Witcombe, J. R. (2001). How narrowly adapted are the products of decentralised breeding? The spread of rice varieties from a participatory plant breeding programme in Nepal. Euphytica 122, 589597.
Manu-Aduening, J. A., Lamboll, R. I., Ampong Mensah, G., Lamptey, J. N., Moses, E., Dankyi, A. A. & Gibson, R. W. (2006). Development of superior cassava cultivars in Ghana by farmers and scientists: the process adopted, outcomes and contributions and changed roles of different stakeholders. Euphytica 150, 4761.
McGuire, S., Manicad, G. & Sperling, L. (2003). Technical and Institutional Issues in Participatory Plant Breeding – Done from a Perspective of Farmer Plant Breeding. A Global Analysis of Issues and Current Experience. PPB Monograph No 2. Columbia: Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
McGuire, S. J. (2008). Path-dependency in plant breeding: challenges facing participatory reforms in the Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Program. Agricultural Systems 96, 139149.
Mwanga, R. O. M., Kigozi, B., Namakula, J., Mpembe, I., Niringiye, C., Tumwegamire, S., Gibson, R. W. & Yencho, G. C. (2010). Submission to the Variety Release Committee for Release of Sweetpotato Varieties 2009. Uganda: National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO).
Mwanga, R. O. M., Odongo, B., Turyamureeba, G., Alajo, A., Yencho, G. C., Gibson, R. W., Smit, N. E. J. M. & Carey, E. E. (2003). Release of six sweetpotato cultivars (‘NASPOT 1’ to ‘NASPOT 6’) in Uganda. Hortscience 38, 475476.
Pandey, S. & Rajatasereekul, S. (1999). Economics of plant breeding: the value of shorter breeding cycles for rice in Northeast Thailand. Field Crops Research 64, 187197.
Sperling, L., Loevinsohn, M. E. & Ntabomvura, B. (1993). Rethinking the farmer's role in plant breeding: local bean experts and on-station selection in Rwanda. Experimental Agriculture 29, 509519.
Weltzien, E., Smith, M. E., Meitzner, L. S. & Sperling, L. (2003). Technical and Institutional Issues in Participatory Plant Breeding – from the Perspective of Formal Plant Breeding: a Global Analysis of Issues, Results and Current Experience. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. PPB Monograph No 1. Cali, Columbia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A. & Goyal, S. N. (2003). Participatory plant breeding in maize: a case study from Gujurat, India. Euphytica 130, 413422.
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, K. D., Gyawali, S., Musa, A. M., Johansen, C., Virk, D. S. & Sthapit, B. R. (2005). Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding. Experimental Agriculture 41, 299320.

Benefits of participatory plant breeding (PPB) as exemplified by the first-ever officially released PPB-bred sweet potato cultivar

  • R. W. GIBSON (a1), I. MPEMBE (a2) and R. O. M. MWANGA (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed