Skip to main content Accessibility help

The assessment of the quality of sugar-beet seed

  • M. J. Durrant (a1), S. J. Brown (a2) and A. Bould (a3)


The accurate prediction of the performance of individual lots of sugar-beet seed in the field is critical when constituting blends of seed for commercial use. Previous studies indicated a need for ‘vigour tests’ to supplement the standard germination test. In many of the studies emphasis was placed on evaluation of tests in the laboratory, whereas in this study equal emphasis was placed on the determination of the values to be predicted. The performance of 20 seed lots with a range of germination between 75 and 95% was assessed in field and laboratory studies in 1981. Further investigations of ten seed lots were made in 1982 and in 1983.

The results in 1981 showed little evidence of agronomically important differences in the relative performance of seed lots with respect to establishment in the field at different sites. Similarly, most seed lots showed consistent differences over a range of tests under controlled conditions. However, use of the experiment mean as a measure of stress revealed marked differences in the range of performance between the best and poorest lota in both the field and laboratory. There were clear indications that performance in the field could be modified by non-random factors that tended to reduce the magnitude of differences among seed lots. In 1982 grazing of seedlings by birds was identified as a factor that could cause greater reduction in the establishment of seed lots with high viability relative to those with low viability. Thus, under some circumstances, a single count of seedlings in non-protected field experiments can give misleading estimates of the differences among seed lots (and probably among other treatments which affect the rate of emergence). Correlation coefficients (γ) were about 0·88 for relationships between establishment from pelleted seed in plots protected from birds and germination or emergence under controlled conditions. These results reduced the need for additional vigour tests. However, the studies emphasized that small differences in germination percentage are important as they can be associated with much larger differences in establishment, particularly under adverse seed-bed conditions. The average standard error for the mean viability of individual seed lots was ±1·89 in germination tests with four replicates of 100 seeds at each of six centres. Although inincreased accuracy may not be possible without much greater replication, we found that the distinction between normal and abnormal seedlings was an important source of experimental error. A less subjective measurement, based on hypocotyl height, warrants further study.



Hide All
Akeson, W. R. & Widner, J. N. (1980). Laboratory packed sand test for measuring vigour of sugar beet seed. Crop Science 20, 641644.
Bakewell, D. (1979). The drill testing service: some observations. British Sugar Beet Review 47 (4), 56.
Bugg, R. (1981). Group study area. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1980. Part I, pp. 6566.
Durrant, M. J. (1981). Some causes of the variations in plant establishment. Proceedings of the iith Winter Congress, Institut International de Recherches Betteravieres, Brussels, pp. 720.
Durrant, M. J., Dunning, R. A. & Jaggard, K. W. (1981). Establishment survey in 1980. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1980, Part I, pp. 6667.
Durrant, M. J., Jaggard, K. W. & Scott, R. K. (1984). Meeting the challenge for sugar beet: magnitude and origin of the problem and possible solutions. In Crop Establishment – Biological Requirements and Engineering Solutions (ed. Carr, M. K. V.). London: Pitman (in the Press).
Durrant, M. J., Payne, P. A. & Mclaren, J. S. (1983). The use of water and some inorganic Bait solutions to advance sugar beet seed. Annals of Applied Biology 103, 507526.
Durrant, M. J. & Scott, R. K. (1982). Prospects for improving plant establishment. British Sugar Beet Review 49 (4), 2529.
Ellis, R. H. & Roberts, E. H. (1980). Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. In Seed Production (ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.), pp. 605635. London: Butterworth.
Gibson, M. S. & Watkins, R. E. (1981). The value of various tests for assessing the vigour of sugar beet seed. Proceedings American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists General Meeting. Minnesota, U.S.A.: American Crystal Sugar Company.
Green, R. (1978). Factors affecting the diet of farmland skylarks, Alauda arvensis. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 913928.
Halmer, P. & Bewley, J. D. (1984). A physiological perspective on seed vigour testing. Seed Science and Technology (in the Press).
Heydecker, W. (1972). Vigour. In Viability of Seeds (ed. Roberts, E. H.), pp. 209252. London: Chapman and Hall.
Heydecker, W. & Coolbear, P. (1977). Seed treatments for improved performance – survey and attempted prognosis. Seed Science and Technology 5, 353425.
Inteenational Seed Testing Association (1976). International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 4, 1177.
Jaggard, K. W., Wickens, R., Webb, D. J. & Scott, R. K. (1983). Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 147161.
Knight, R. (1970). The measurement and interpretation of genotype-environment interactions. Euphytica 19, 225235.
Kraak, H. L., Vos, J., Peery, D. A. & Beckendam, J. (1984). Studies on field emergence and vigour of sugar beet and onion seeds. Seed Science and Technology (in the Press).
Lexander, K. (1981). Physical and physiological seed characteristics influencing field emergence of sugar beet. Proceedings of the 44th Winter Congress, Institut International de Recherches Belteravieres, Brussels, pp. 2136.
Longden, P. C. (1973). Washing sugar beet seed. Institut International de Recherches Betteravieres, Brussels 6 (3), 154162.
Mcdonald, M. B. (1975). A review and evaluation of seed vigour tests. Proceedings of the Association of Seed Analysts of North America 65, 109139.
Matthews, S. (1981). Evaluation of techniques for germination and vigour studies. Seed Science and Technology 9, 543551.
Perry, D. A. (1978 a). Report of the vigour test committee 1974–1977. Seed Science and Technology 6, 159181.
Peery, D. A. (1978 b). Problems of the development and application of vigour tests to vegetable seeds. Ada Horticulture 83, 141147.
Sperlingsson, C. (1981). The influence of the seed soil physical environment on seedling growth and establishment. Proceedings of the 44th Winter Congress, Institut International de Recherches Betteravieres, Brussels, pp. 5977.

The assessment of the quality of sugar-beet seed

  • M. J. Durrant (a1), S. J. Brown (a2) and A. Bould (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.