Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:21:20.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment of herbage legume varieties: I. Lucerne

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Ellis Davies  and
J. D. H. Reusch
W. Ellis Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
J. D. H. Reusch
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The performance of four varieties of lucerne, du Puits, Provence, Grimm and S 205, as spaced plants, in broadcast plots and in drills, with and without a companion grass was compared by yield of dry matter, percentage and yield of crude protein, leanness, weediness and reaction to leaf spot (Pseudopeziza medicaginis).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1964 , pp. 61 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahloren, H. L., Smith, D. C. & Nielson, E. L. (1945). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 37, 268–81.Google Scholar
Atwood, S. S. & Garber, R. J. (1942). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, B. R. (1947). Agron. J. 39, 760–61.Google Scholar
Davis, A. G. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. L. (1951). Agron. J. 43, 331–7.Google Scholar
Davies, R. O., Morgan, T. B. & Davies, W. Ellis (1953). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 8, 149–68.Google Scholar
Davies, W. Ellis (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 285–99.Google Scholar
Davies, W. Ellis (1960). J. Inst. Corn Merch. 8, 27–31.Google Scholar
Green, J. O., Cowling, M. & Alder, F. E. (1955). Grassland Research Inst. Mem. no. 1, 16–30.Google Scholar
Hanson, A. A., Spragtue, V. G. & Myers, W. M. (1952). Agron. J. 44, 373–6.Google Scholar
Jekabsons, V. (1958). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 13, 70–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, H. H. (1947) J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 39, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, A. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 295–304.Google Scholar
Milton, W. E. J. (1938). Welsh J. Agric. 14, 203–13.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. K. & Law, A. G. (1952). Agron. J. 44, 520–4.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Davtes, W. (1930). Bull. Welsh PL Breed. Sta. series H, no. 10.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. L. & Hayes, H. K. (1947). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 39, 192–7.Google Scholar
Torrsie, J. H. & Allison, J. L. (1945). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 37, 852–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tysdal, H. & Kiesselbach, T. A. (1939). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 31, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weihino, R. M. & Robertson, D. W. (1943). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 35, 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M. G. & Mukerji, S. K. (1950). Agron. J. 42, 555–9.Google Scholar
Willey, L. A. (1956). J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 8, 597–623.Google Scholar
Williams, W. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsie, C. P. (1949). Agron. J. 41, 412–20.Google Scholar