Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:31:38.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Frisch  and
T. E. Vercoe
J. E. Frisch
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Tropical Animal Science, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, Box 5545, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4701, Australia
T. E. Vercoe
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Tropical Animal Science, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, Box 5545, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Queensland 4701, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Calves from three breeds, Brahman, Hereford × Shorthorn (HS) and Brahman × HS (BX), were divided equally into two groups, one of which was treated every 3 weeks from birth onwards to control ticks and gastrointestinal helminths, and one of which was untreated. Mortalities, growth rates and levels of resistance to environmental stresses that affected both mortality and growth under grazing conditions were recorded for all animals up to weaning (6 months) and for all males up to 15 months of age. The Brahmans were the most and the HS were the least resistant to environmental stresses, each of which was shown to depress growth in proportion to its magnitude and to contribute to the high mortalities of the HS. All breeds responded positively to parasite control with the greatest response in both survival and growth in the HS breed and the least response in the Brahman breed.

Samples of males from the various breed-treatment groups were taken into pens where they were protected from environmental stresses and fed both low-quality pasture hay and high-quality lucerne hay ad libitum. Measurements were made of fasting metabolism, maintenance requirement, voluntary food intake and gain, variables related to the growth potential of each animal. The HS animals had the highest whilst the Brahmans had the lowest values for each variable.

However, despite their low growth potential, the Brahmans had the highest growtli rate, and the HS, despite their high growth potential, had the lowest growth rate, when growth was measured in the presence of all environmental stresses. When parasites were controlled, growth rates were highest for the BX, the breed with intermediate growtli potential, and did not differ between the HS and Brahmans. These interactions arose because of the different contributions of resistance to environmental stresses and growth potential to growth rate measured at the different levels of environmental stresses. The relevance of these interactions to breed evaluation and cross-breeding is considered.

Growth potential and resistance to environmental stresses were negatively correlated both between and within breeds, though the latter was biased by the effects of compensation. The influence of these relationships on the likely outcome of selection for increased growth rate, both between and within breeds, is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 137 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Claringbold, P. J. (1961). The use of orthogonal polynomials in the partition of chi-square. Australian Journal of Statistics 3, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. (Jr) & Taylor, St. C. S. (1971). Genetic analysis of degree of maturity. Journal of Animal Science 33, 717–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, J. E. (1973 a). Comparative mortality rates of Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle in Central Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 13, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1973 b). Comparative drought resistance of Bos indicus and Bos taurus crossbred herds in Contral Queensland. II. Relative mortality rates, calf birth weights, and weights and weight changes of breeding cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 13, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1975). The relative incidence and effect of bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. Animal Production 21, 265–274.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1981). Changes occurring in cattle as a consequence of selection for growth rate in a stressful environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1982). The use of teat-size measurements or calf weaning weight as an aid to selection against teat defects in cattle. Animal Production 32, 127–133.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E., O'Neill, C. J. & Burrow, H. M. (1984). The incidence and effect of poisoning with Lantana camara in different cattle breeds. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1976). Maintenance requirements, fasting metabolism and body composition in different cattle breeds. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Vermorel, M.), pp. 209–212. E.E.A.P. Publication, no. 19 de Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1977). Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos laurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Animal Production 25, 343–358.Google Scholar
Oosterlee, C. C. (1982). Genetic and environmental aspects of the immune response. Livestock Production Science 9, 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, K. J., Horst, P. & Kleinheisterkamp, H. H. (1982). The importance of coat colour and coat type as indicators of productive adaptability of beef cattle in a subtropical environment. Tropical Animal Production 7, 296–304.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H. S. & O'Sullivan, P. J. (1950). Methods for egg counts and larval cultures for strongyles infecting the gastrointestinal tracts of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulston, W. J., Wharton, R. H., Nolan, J.Kerr, J. D., Wilson, J. T., Thompson, P. G. & Schotz, M. (1981). A survey for resistance in cattle ticks to acaracides. Australian Veterinary Journal 57, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangster, N. C., Whitlock, H. V., Russ, I. G., Gunawan, M., Griffin, D. L. & Kelly, J. D. (1979). Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Ostertagia circumcincta resistant to levamisole, morantel tartrate and thiabendazole: occurrence of field strains. Research in Veterinary Science 27, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Symoens, J. & Rosenthal, M. (1977). Levamisole in the modulation of the immune response: the current expeiimental and clinical state: a review. Journal of the Reticuloendothelial Society 21, 175–221.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1964). Coat changes of cattle in relation to adaptation. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 181–187.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1982). Genetic variation of rectal temperature in cows and its relationship to fertility. Animal Production 35, 401–412.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1983). Variation in rectal temperaturo of cattle in a tropical environment and its relation to growth rate. Animal Production(in the Press).Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. & Schleger, A. V. (1960). The significance of coat type in cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. & Short, A. J. (1972). Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vercoe, J. E. (1970 a). Fasting metabolism of Brahman, Africander and Hereford × Shorthorn cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercoe, J. E. (1970 b). Fasting metabolism and heat incrementof feeding in Brahman × British and British cattle. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Schurch, A. and Wenk, C.), pp. 85–88. E.A.A.P. Publication, no. 13, Juris, Zurich.Google Scholar