Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:02:30.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Working Farm Participation and Acreage Enrollment in the Conservation Reserve Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Dayton M. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Patrick Sullivan
Affiliation:
Rural and Resource Economics Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Roger Claassen
Affiliation:
Rural and Resource Economics Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Get access

Abstract

Among Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) participants, there is a distinction between farm households using the program to ease out of farming and those using the program to augment production receipts. We find evidence that factors other than crop or livestock revenue and environmental factors are associated with program participation and acreage enrollment among farmers who continue agricultural production. Program payments and farm size are positively associated with the amount of land enrolled in the CRP, and characteristics of participants in land retirement and working-lands CRP components are similar.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.K.. Microecono-metrics: Methods Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H.H., and Boisvert, R.. “Explaining Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program and Its Effects on Farm Productivity and Efficiency.” Selected Paper, American Agricultural Economics Association, Providence, RI, 2005. Internet site: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin (Accessed April 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Dubman, R.Variance Estimation with USDA's Farm Costs and Returns Surveys and Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture Staff Report AGES 00-01, 2000.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H., Mishra, A., and Ahearn, M.. “Labor Supply by Farm Operators under ‘Decoupled’ Farm Program Payments.Review of Economics of the Household 2,4(2004):367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishe, R.P.H.Trost, R.P., and Lurie, P.M.. “Labor Force Earnings and College Choice of Young Women: An Examination of Selectivity Bias and Comparative Advantage.Economics of Education Review 1,2(1981):169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, R.A.An Econometric Analysis of the Environmental Benefits Provided by the Conservation Reserve Program.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,2(2004):399413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D.A.Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Mishra, A.K.. “Farming Efficiency and the Determinants of Multiple Job Holding by Farm Operators.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86,3(2004):722–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Haufler, J.B.Fish and Wildlife Benefits of Farm Bill Conservation Programs:2000-2005 Update. Technical Review 05-2, The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD, 2005. Internet site: www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/ceap/fwbenefit.html. (Accessed 10/14/2005)Google Scholar
Heimlich, R.Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2003. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AH-722, 2003. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/arei/ah722/. (Accessed 8/20/2005)Google Scholar
Hopkins, J., and Johansson, R.. “Beyond Environmental Compliance: Stewardshipas Good Business.Amber Waves 2,2(2004):3037. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/Amberwaves/April04/Features/BeyondEnvironmental.htm.Google Scholar
Jaroszewski, L.G., Poe, G., and Boisvert, R.. “Allocation Land to New York's Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program to Maximize Environmental Benefit.” Selected Paper, American Agricultural Economics Association, Tampa, FL, 2000.Google Scholar
Khanna, M.Sequential Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies and Its Implications for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83,1(2001):3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kott, P.S.Usingthe Delete-a-Group Jackknife Variance Estimator in NASS Surveys. U. S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 1997.Google Scholar
Lambert, D., Sullivan, P., Claassen, R., and Foreman, L.. “Profiles of U. S. Farm Households Adopting Conservation-Compatible Practices.Land Use Policy 23,2(2006):117.Google Scholar
Lee, L.F.Simultaneous Equations Models with Discrete and Censored Dependent Variables.” Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Manski, C.F. and McFadden, D., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lohr, L., and Park, T.. “Utility-Consistent Discrete-Continuous Choices in Soil Conservation.Land Economics 71,4(1995):474–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, L., Hardie, I., and Parker, D.. “Analyzing Agricultural Landowners' Willingness to Install Streamside Buffers.” Working Paper No. 02-01, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Maryland, College Park, 2002. Internet site: www.arec.umd.edu/publications/papers/Working-Papers-PDF-files/02-Ol.pdf. (Accessed 4/10/2005)Google Scholar
McGranahan, D.A.Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change. AER-781, Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1999.Google Scholar
Mittelhammer, R.C., Judge, G.G., and Miller, D.J.. Econometric Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, K., and Weinberg, M.. “Measuring the Success of Conservation Programs.Amber Waves 2,4(2004):1421.Google Scholar
Smith, M.Conservation Reserve Program Approaches Acreage Limit.” Agricultural Outlook 262(June/July 1999):2326. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/junl999/ao262d.pdf. (Accessed 9/14/2005)Google Scholar
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D.. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82,4(2000):9931005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P., Hellerstein, D., Hansen, L., Johansson, R., Koenig, S., Lubowski, R., McBride, W., McGranahan, D., Roberts, M., Vogei, S., and Bucholtz, S.. The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, AER-834, 2004. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/aer834/. (Accessed 1/26/2005)Google Scholar
Tunali, I.A General Structure for Models of Double-Selection and an Application to Joint Migration/Earnings Process with Remigration.Resource Labor Economics 8(1986):235–82.Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). “Conservation Reserve Program Enrollment Statistics and Program Information 2004 Fiscal Year.” Washington, DC: Farm Service Agency Report, 2004. Internet site: www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/cepd/stats/FY2004.pdf. (Accessed 11/03/2005)Google Scholar
Warner, R.E., Kammin, L.A., Hoffman, C.L., Mankin, P.C., Hubert, P.G., Olson, D.J., and Wendte, L.. “Conservation Buffers in East-Central Illinois: Use by Nesting Passerines and Management Characteristics.” Conservation Reserve Program—Planting for the Future, Allen, A.W. and Vandever, M.W., eds. Washington, DC: U. S. Geological Survey, SIR 2005-5145, 2005. Internet site: www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/crpconf04/21490.pdf. (Accessed 1/15/2006)Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wu, J.Slippage Effects in the Conservation Reserve Program.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82,4(2004):979–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar