Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T01:27:48.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Willingness to Plant Identity Preserved Crops: The Case of Mississippi Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Darren Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University
Tom Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University
Get access

Abstract

The willingness to plant identity preserved (IP) crops was examined using Mississippi soybean producers as an example. A contingent valuation framework was used to assess the impacts of offered premiums on a producer's probability of planting IP soybeans. Findings suggest that offered premiums significantly affect planting decisions. In addition, desire to learn more about IP production was found to increase the probability of planting, suggesting that desire to learn leads to experimentation. Finally, prior knowledge or experience planting IP crops significantly decreased the probability of planting.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadi-Esfahani, F. and Stanmore, R.Quality Premiums for Australian Wheat in the Growing Asian Markets.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(1994):237250. Google Scholar
Bale, M. and M. Ryan. “Wheat Protein Premiums and Price Differentials.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(1977):530532.Google Scholar
Barnett, B. and Gibson, B.Economic Challenges of Transgenic Crops: The Case of Bt Cotton.” Journal of Economic Issues 33(1999):647659.Google Scholar
Bierlen, R. and Grunewald, O.Price Incentives for Commercial Fresh Tomatoes.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(1995):138148. Google Scholar
Boehlje, M.Structural Changes in the Agricultural Industries: How Do We Measure, Analyze and Understand Them?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):10281041. Google Scholar
Bolton, P. and Harris, C.Strategic Experimentation.” Econometrica 67(1999):349374. Google Scholar
Brester, G., Biere, A., and Armbrister, J.Marketing Identity Preserved Grain Products: The Case of American White Wheat Producers.” Agribusiness 12(1996):301308. Google Scholar
Brown, J., Ethridge, D., Hudson, D., and Engels, C.An Automated Econometric Approach for Estimating and Reporting Daily Cotton Market Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(1995):409422. Google Scholar
Centner, T., Turner, S., Bryan, J., and Mizelle, W. “Product Differentiation Protection: Vidalia Onions as a Case Study of Regional Specialty Crops.” Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 576, November 1989.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. “Combining Actual and Contingent Behavior Data to Model Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(1997):3043. Google Scholar
Cooper, J.A.A. and Keim, R.Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):5464. Google Scholar
Dobbs, T.Price Premiums for Organic Crops.” Choices, Second Quarter 1998, pp. 3941.Google Scholar
Dobbs, T. and Cole, J.Potential Effects on Rural Economies of Conversion to Sustainable Farming Systems.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1992):7080.Google Scholar
Ethridge, D. and Davis, B.Hedonic Price Estimation for Commodities: An Application to Cotton.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 7(1982):156163.Google Scholar
Gao, X., Spreen, T., and DeLorenzo, M.A Bio-Economic Dynamic Programming Analysis of the Seasonal Supply Response by Florida Dairy Producers.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(1992):211220.Google Scholar
Gerber, J.Farmer Participation in Research: A Model for Adaptive Research and Education.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1992):118121.Google Scholar
Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.Google Scholar
Guzman, R. and Ventura, G.A Model of Experimentation with Information Externalities.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23(1998):934.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. and Devadoss, S.Quality Premiums and the Firm's Production Decision.” Southern Economic Journal 62(1995):107115.Google Scholar
Hill, L., Brophy, J., and Florkowski, W.Production Response of Illinois Farmers to Premiums for Low-Temperature Dried Corn.” Agribusiness 4(1988):197209.Google Scholar
Hudson, D., Ethridge, D., and Brown, J.Producer Prices in Cotton Markets: Evaluation of Reported Price Information Accuracy.” Agribusiness 12(1996):353362.Google Scholar
Hudson, D., Ethridge, D., and Segarra, E.Incorrect Price Information for a Heterogeneous Commodity: A Conceptual Synthesis.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1998):365376.Google Scholar
Jolly, D.Differences Between Buyers and Non-Buyers of Organic Produce and Willingness to Pay Organic Price Premiums.” Journal of Agribusiness 9(1991):97111.Google Scholar
Kalaitzandonakes, N.Agrobiotechnology and Competitiveness.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2000):12241233.Google Scholar
Kalaitzandonakes, N. and Bjornson, B.Vertical and Horizontal Coordination in the Agro-Biotechnology Industry: Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(1993):129139.Google Scholar
Kalaitzandonakes, N. and Maltsbarger, R. “Biotechnology and Identity-Preserved Supply Chains: A Look at the Future of Crop Production and Marketing.” Choices, Fourth Quarter 1998, 1518.Google Scholar
Klein, K., Hobbs, J., and Kerr, W.Farmer Acceptance of Biotechnology and Marketing Strategies: Implications for Agribusinss from Surveys in Western Canada.” Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 6(1994): 7188.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K.A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74(1966):132157.Google Scholar
Leask, B. and Anderson, R.Riding the Third Wave: Implications of Biotechnology for the Canadian Seed Crop Industry.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(1998): 455462.Google Scholar
Lentz, T. and Akridge, J.Economic Evaluation of Alternative Supply Chains for Soybean Peroxidase.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 28(1997):2841.Google Scholar
Lohr, L, and Park, T.Discrete/Continuous Choices in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Soil Conservation Decisions in Michigan.” Review of Agricultural Economics 16(1994):115.Google Scholar
Lyon, F.How Farmers Research and Learn: The Case of Arable Farmers of East Anglia, UK.” Agricultural and Human Values 13(1996): 3947.Google Scholar
McGuirk, A. Preston, W., and Jones, G.Introducing Foods Produced Using Biotechnology: The Case of Bovine Somatotropin.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(1992):209223.Google Scholar
Pannell, D.Optimal Herbicide Strategies Given Yield and Quality Impacts of Weeds.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 63(1995):311317.Google Scholar
Renkowski, M.Marketing Strategies of Biotechnology Firms: Implications for U.S. Agriculture.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(1997):123128.Google Scholar
Rosen, S.Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82(1974):3455.Google Scholar
Salanie, B. The Economics of Contracts: A Primer. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google Scholar
Spiess, J.Using Experimentation as Experimental Learning.” Agricultural Education Magazine 65(1992):1315.Google Scholar
Trelawny, P. and Stonehouse, D.The Effects of Introducing Supplemental Bovine Somatotropin to the Canadian Dairy Industry.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 37(1989):191209.Google Scholar
Updaw, N., Bullock, J., and Nichols, T.Pricing Soybeans on the Basis of Oil and Protein Content.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 8(1976):129132.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. Quality as a Determinant of Vegetable Prices. Columbia University Press, New York, 1929.Google Scholar