Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T21:21:05.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Watershed-Based Economic Model of Alternative Management Practices in Southern Agricultural Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Krishna P. Paudel ,
Diane Hite ,
Walaiporn Intarapapong  and
Dwi Susanto
Krishna P. Paudel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Diane Hite
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, AL
Walaiporn Intarapapong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Dwi Susanto
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the environmental impacts of alternative cultural practices within a watershed under different water quality standards. We used experimental data on nutrient runoff to determine the optimal amount of broiler litter application in hay production in Louisiana. To compensate for the lack of experimental data, we used biophysical simulation models to find the optimal combination of agricultural best-management practices in a watershed in Mississippi. The results indicated that stricter environmental standards lower total profit potential and litter utilization.

Keywords

broiler littercropping systemsoptimizationwatershed level modelingwater qualityC6Q1Q25D21
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 381 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackland Research Center. APEX User's Guide and Technical Documentation, Version 8190. Texas Agricultural Experimental Station, 1999.Google Scholar
Boucher, R., and Gillespie, J.M.. Projected Costs and Returns and Whole Farm Analysis for Major Agricultural Enterprises, Louisiana. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 1998.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, M.M. Jr.Impact of Best Management Practices and Organic Wastes on Water Quality and Crop Production. Poultry Litter Application Demonstration Project. Hill Farm Research Station, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, 2001.Google Scholar
Sharpley, A.N., and Williams, J.R., eds. 1990a. EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator Vol. I, Model Documentation. USDA Technical Bulletin 1768, 1990.Google Scholar
Sharpley, A.N., and Williams, J.R., eds. 1990b. EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator Vol. II, Usual Manual. USDA Technical Bulletin 1768, 1990.Google Scholar
Williams, J.R., Arnold, J.G., and Srinivasan, R.. The APEX Model. BRC Report 00-06, 2000.Google Scholar