Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:05:09.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valuing Transgenic Cotton Technologies Using a Risk/Return Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Kelly J. Bryant ,
Jeanne M. Reeves ,
Robert L. Nichols ,
Jeremy K. Greene ,
Christopher H. Tingle ,
Glenn E. Studebaker ,
Fred M. Bourland ,
Charles D. Capps Jr.  and
Frank E. Groves
Kelly J. Bryant
Affiliation:
Southeast Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Monticello, AR
Jeanne M. Reeves
Affiliation:
Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC
Robert L. Nichols
Affiliation:
Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC
Jeremy K. Greene
Affiliation:
Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC
Christopher H. Tingle
Affiliation:
Syngenta Crop Protection, Vero Beach Research Center, Vero Beach, FL
Glenn E. Studebaker
Affiliation:
Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Keiser, AR
Fred M. Bourland
Affiliation:
Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Keiser, AR
Charles D. Capps Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Monticello, AR
Frank E. Groves
Affiliation:
Southeast Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Monticello, AR
Get access

Abstract

Stochastic Efficiency with Respect to a Function (SERF) is used to rank transgenic cotton technology groups and place an upper and lower bound on their value. Yield and production data from replicated plot experiments are used to build cumulative distribution functions of returns for nontransgenic, Roundup Ready, Bollgard, and stacked gene cotton cultivars. Analysis of Arkansas data indicated that the stacked gene and Roundup Ready technologies would be preferred by a large number of risk neutral and risk averse producers as long as the costs of the technology and seed are below the lower bounds calculated in this manuscript.

Keywords

cottonfinancial riskmarket valueSERFtransgenicQ12Q16
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 767 - 775
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benedict, J.H. “ Bt Cotton: Opportunities and Challenges.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., pp. 25–29. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 1996.Google Scholar
Benson, N.R., Bourland, F.M., Robertson, W.C., Hornbeck, J.M., and Groves, F.E. Arkansas Cotton Variety Tests–2001. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Series 491, 2001.Google Scholar
Bryant, K.J., Nichols, R.L., Allen, C.T., Benson, N.R., Bourland, F.M., Earnest, L.D., Kharboutli, M.S., Smith, K.S., and Webster, E.P. “Transgenic Cotton Varieties: An Economic Comparison in Arkansas.” Journal of Cotton Science 7,4(2003): 194–204.Google Scholar
Bryant, K., Greene., J., Capps., C., Groves., F., Tingle., C., Studebaker., G., Bourland., F., Nichols., B., and Reeves, J. “An Economic Comparison of Transgenic and Non-Trans-genic Cotton Production Systems in Arkansas.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., pp. 534—48. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 2004.Google Scholar
Collins, J.R. “BXN Cotton: Marketing Plans and Weed Control Programs Utilizing Buctril.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., p. 201. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 1996.Google Scholar
Cooke, F.T. Jr., Scott, W.P., Martin, S.W., and Parvin, D.W. Jr. “The Economics of Bt Cotton in the Mississippi Delta.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., pp. 175–77. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 2001.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Klotz-Ingram, C., and Jans, S. “Farm-Level Effects of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in the U.S.A.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34,1 (2002): 149-63.Google Scholar
Frisvold, G., and Pochat, R. “Impacts of Bt Cotton Adoption: What State-Level Data Can and Can't Tell Us.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., pp. 555-57. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 2004.Google Scholar
Hardaker, J.B., Richardson, J.W., Lien., G., and Schumann, K.D. “Stochastic Efficiency Analysis with Risk Aversion Bounds: A Simplified Approach.” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48,2(2004):253-70.Google Scholar
Hurley, T.M., Mitchell, P.D., and Rice, M.E. “Risk and the Value of Bt Corn.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86,2(2004):345-58.Google Scholar
Johnson, P.N., and Blackshear, J. “Economic Analysis of Roundup Ready Versus Conventional Cotton Varieties in the Southern High Plains of Texas.” The Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 17(2004):87–96.Google Scholar
Jost, P., Shurley., D., Culpepper., S., Roberts., P., Nichols., R., Reeves., J., and Anthony, S. “Economic Comparison of Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton Production Systems in Georgia.” Agronomy Journal 100,1 (2008) :42–51.Google Scholar
Karner, M., Hutson, A.L., and Goodson, J. “Bollgard—Impact and Value to Oklahoma’s Cotton Industry 1996-1999.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., pp. 1289–93. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 2000.Google Scholar
Laughlin, D.H., and Spurlock, S.R. User's Guide for the Mississippi State Budget Generator Version 6.0 for Windows. Starkville: Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Internet site: www.agecon.msstate.edu/laughlin/msbg.php (Accessed June 19, 2007).Google Scholar
McBride, W.D., and El-Osta, H.S. “Impacts of the Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Financial Performance.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34,1 (2002): 175-91.Google Scholar
Nichols, R.L., May, L.O., and Bourland, F. “Introduction to the Symposium—Transgenic Pest-Managing Cultivars: Status and Testing Issues.” Crop Science 43(2003): 1582-83.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Schumann., K., and Feldman, P. Simulation and Econometrics to Analyze Risk. College Station: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, Internet site: www.afpc.tamu.edu/courses/643/downloads.php?dir=5 (Accessed June 19, 2007).Google Scholar
Sherrick, S. “Roundup Ready Cotton: Marketing Plans and Weed Control Programs using Roundup Ultra.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dugger, P. and Richter, D.A. eds., p. 201. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council, 1996.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Marketing Service. Cotton Varieties Planted—2006 Crop. Memphis, TN: Author, September 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Marketing Service. Cotton Varieties Planted-2001 Crop. Memphis, TN: Author, 2001.Google Scholar