Skip to main content Accessibility help

To What Surprises Do Hog Futures Markets Respond?

  • Julieta Frank (a1), Philip Garcia (a1) and Scott H. Irwin (a1)


We reassess the effect of new information in the Hogs and Pigs Reports (HPR) focusing on announcements' rationality and alternative surprises. HPR announcements are irrational estimates of final estimates, and market expectations are irrational estimates of HPR numbers. Using the market's best forecast and incorporating final estimates, we modify conventional information measures. Despite differences as large as 33 cents/cwt in price response, findings suggest there is little to differentiate among surprise measures. Regardless, the message that HPR provides new information to the market is strongly supported. On balance, marketing (breeding) information has a larger effect on short-term (long-term) price changes.



Hide All
Blanton, B., Johnson, S.R., Brandt, J.A., and Holt, M.T.Applications of Quarterly Livestock Models in Evaluating and Revising Inventory Data.” NCR 134 Conference Proceedings, 1985, pp. 120.
Carter, C.A.Commodity Futures Markets: A Survey.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 75(1999):209–47.
Carter, C.A., and Galopin, C.A.Informational Content of Government Hogs and Pigs Reports.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):711–18.
Colling, P., and Irwin, S.H.The Reaction of Live Hog Futures Prices to USDA Hogs and Pigs Reports.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):8494.
Colling, P.Informational Content of Government Hogs and Pigs Reports: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):698702.
Colling, P., Irwin, S.H., and Zulauf, C.R.Weak-and Strong-Form Rationality Tests of Market Analysts' Expectations of USDA Hogs and Pigs Reports.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1992):263–70.
Egelkraut, T., Garcia, P., and Sherrick, B.Options-Based Forecasts of Futures Prices in the Presence of Limit Moves.” Applied Economics 39(2007):145–52.
Garcia, P., and Leuthold, R.M.A Selected Review of Agricultural Commodity Futures and Options Markets.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2004):235–72.
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
Hoffman, G.The Effect of Quarterly Livestock Reports on Cattle and Hog Prices.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 2(1980):145–50.
Hudson, M.A., Koontz, S.R., and Purcell, W.D. The Impact of Hog and Pig Reports on Live Hog Futures Prices: An Event Study of Market Efficiency. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural Economics Bulletin AE-54, 1984.
Hurd, M.Estimation in Truncated Samples When There Is Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 11(1979):247–58.
Isengildina, O., Irwin, S., and Good, D.The Value of USDA Situation and Outlook Information in Livestock and Hogs Markets.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2006):262–82.
Kodres, L.E.Tests of Unbiasedness in the Foreign Exchange Futures Markets: An Examination of Price Limits and Conditional Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of Business 66(1993):463–90.
Maddala, G.S., and Nelson, F.D.Specification Errors in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” NBER working paper no. 96, July 1975.
Mann, T., and Dowen, R.J.Are Hog and Pig Reports Informative?Journal of Futures Markets 16(1996):273–87.
Mann, T., and Dowen, R.J.The Impact of Proprietary-Public Information on Pork Futures.” Journal of Futures Markets 17(1997):417–32.
Meyer, S.D., and Lawrence, J.D.Comparing USDA Hogs and Pigs Reports to Subsequent Slaughter: Does Systematic Error Exist?NCR 134 Conference Proceedings, 1988, pp. 1935.
Miller, S.The Response of Futures Prices to New Market Information: The Case of Live Hogs.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 2(1979):6770.
Mills, J.G., and Schroeder, T.C.Are Cattle on Feed Report Revisions Random and Does Industry Anticipate Them? Agribusiness 20(2004):363–74.
Orazem, P., and Falk, B.L.Measuring Market Responses to Error-Ridden Government Announcements.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 29(1989):4155.
Runkle, D.E.Are Farrowing Intentions Rational Forecasts?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):594600.
Runkle, D.E.Do Futures Markets React Efficiently to Predictable Errors in Government Announcements?Journal of Futures Markets 12(1992):635–43.
Schaefer, M.P., Myers, R.J., and Koontz, S.R.Rational Expectations and Market Efficiency in the U.S. Live Cattle Futures Markets: The Role of Proprietary Information.” Journal of Futures Markets 24(2004):429–51.
USDA, NASS. Hogs and Pigs Final Estimates Statistical Bulletins. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Bulletin No. 797 for 1983–1987, 1989, Bulletin No. 904 for 1988–1992, 1994, Bulletin No. 951 for 1993–1997, 1998, and Bulletin No. 986 for 1998–2002, 2004.


To What Surprises Do Hog Futures Markets Respond?

  • Julieta Frank (a1), Philip Garcia (a1) and Scott H. Irwin (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed