Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Role of On-Site Time in Recreational Demand for Wilderness

  • Ram N. Acharya (a1), L. Upton Hatch (a2) and Howard A. Clonts (a2)

Abstract

Treatment of time in travel cost models has been a source of contention among economists. The debate persists because welfare estimates, which are the principal objectives of these studies, are highly sensitive to the treatment of time. The present study examines the dual role of on-site time using evidence from two wilderness areas in Alabama. The empirical results comply with the theoretical expectation that on-site time is both a source of utility and cost. The exclusion of on-site time from demand functions results in biased parameter estimates. In particular, it yields smaller own-price coefficients and higher welfare estimates.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bockstael, N.E., Strand, I.E., and Hanemann, W.M.. “Time and the Recreational Demand Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(May 1987):293302.
Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.. “Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparison and Application of Some Estimators and Tests.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 1(1986):2953.
Cesario, F.J., and Knetsch, J.L.. “Time Bias in Recreation Benefit Estimation Models.” Water Resources Research 6(June 1970):700–4.
Clonts, H.A.Characteristics and Preferences of Visitors to Cheaha and Sipsey Wilderness in Alabama: Monitoring for Limits of Acceptable Change. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Report. Auburn, AL: Auburn University, 1994.
Creel, M.D., and Loomis, J.B.. “Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(May 1990):434–41.
Cuddington, J.T., Johnson, F.R., and Knetsch, J.L.. “Valuing Amenity Resources in the Presence of Substitutes.” Land Economics 57(November 1981):526–35.
Duffield, J.Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation: A Comparative Analysis.” Advances in Applied Macroeconomics, Volume 3. Smith, V.K. and Witte, A.D., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
Freeman, A.M. III. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1993.
Grogger, J.T., and Carson, R.T.. Models for Counts From Choice Based Samples. San Diego: University of California, 1987.
Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Griliches, Z.. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52(1984):909–38.
Johnson, T.G.Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (February 1983):169–71.
Kealy, M.J., and Bishop, R.C.. “Theoretical and Empirical Specifications Issues in Travel Cost Demand Studies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(August 1986):660–67.
Larson, D.M., and Shaikh, S.L.. “Empirical Specification Requirements for Two-Constraint Models of Recreation Choice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(May 2001):428–40.
Maddala, G.S.Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
McConnell, K.E.Onsite Time in the Demand for Recreation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(November 1992):918–25.
McConnell, K.E., and Strand, I.E.. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: An Application to Sportfishing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(February 1981):153–56.
McConnell, K.E., and Strand, I.E.. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(February 1983):172–74.
Mendelsohn, R.An Application of the Hedonic Travel Cost Framework for Recreation Modeling to the Valuation of Deer.” Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Volume 3. Smith, V.K. and Witte, A.D., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
Nichols, L.M., Bowes, M., and Dwyer, J.F.. Reflective Travel Time in Travel Cost Based Estimates of Recreation Use and Value. University of Illinois Forestry Res. Rep. No. 78-12, AES, 1978.
Ozuna, T., and Gomez, I.A.Estimating a system of recreation demand functions using a seemingly unrelated Poisson regression approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76,2(1994):356–60.
Rosenthal, D.H.The Necessity for Substitute Prices in Recreation Demand Analyses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(Novem-ber 1987):828–37.
Shaw, D.On Site Samples' Regression: Problems of Non-negative Integers, Truncation and Endogenous Stratification.” Journal of Econometrics 37(1988):211–23.
Shaw, W.D.Searching for the Opportunity Cost of an Individual's Time.” Land Economics 68(February 1992):107–15.
Smith, V.K., Desvousges, W.H., and Mc-Givney, M.P.. “The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time in Recreation Demand Models.” Land Economics 59(August 1983):259–78.
Smith, T.P.The Role of Onsite Time in the Demand for Outdoor Recreation (Recreational Time).” Dissertation Abstracts, DAI-A 52/06, 1991.
Ward, F.A.Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(February 1983):167–68.

Keywords

The Role of On-Site Time in Recreational Demand for Wilderness

  • Ram N. Acharya (a1), L. Upton Hatch (a2) and Howard A. Clonts (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed