Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Risk and Site Factors Affecting Potential Nitrogen Delivery in the Virginia Coastal Plain

  • Wei Peng (a1) and Darrell J. Bosch (a1)

Abstract

The effects of cropland slope, distance to surface water, farmers' risk attitudes, and farmers' nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications on potential N delivery to streams and costs of reducing N delivery were evaluated for a representative Virginia peanut-cotton farm. Target MOTAD and generalized stochastic dominance were used to select preferred plans for different levels of risk aversion. Costs of reducing N delivery were lower on farms where fields were located close to surface water, where N was overapplied relative to extension fertilizer recommendations, and where the operator was risk averse. Cropland slope had less effect on cost of reducing N delivery relative to other factors.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abler, D. G., and Shortle, J. S.The Political Economy of Water Quality Protection from Agricultural Chemicals.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1991): 5360.
Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center (ACIC). “Promoting Conservation Innovation in Agriculture Through Crop Insurance.” Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. March 23, 2000. Available: http://www.agconserv.com/promote.html Accessed May 2000.
Babcock, B. A.The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1992):270280.
Babcock, B. A., Chalfant, J. A., and Collender, R. N.Simultaneous Input Demands and Land Allocation in Agricultural Production under Uncertainty.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 12(1987):207215.
Bosch, Darrell J., Pease, James W., Batie, Sandra S., and Shanholtz, Vernon O.. Crop Selection, Tillage Practices, and Chemical and Nutrient Applications in Two Regions of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Virginia Water Resources Research Center Bulletin 176. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1992.
Bosch, Darrell J. and Pease, James W.Economic Risk and Water Quality Protection in Agriculture.” Review of Agricultural Economics. 22(2000)438463.
Braden, John, Gary, B.Johnson, V., Bouzaher, Aziz, and Miltz, DavidOptimal Spatial Management of Agricultural Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):404413.
Carpentier, C.L., Bosch, D.J., and Batie, S.S.Using Spatial Information to Reduce Costs of Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(1998):7284.
Chesapeake Bay Program. “1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement.” Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, December 9, 1983. Available: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/1983ChesapeakeBayAgreement.pdf/ Accessed: May 24, 2000.
Chesapeake Bay Program. “Overview of the Bay Program: America's Premier Watershed Restoration Program.” Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, February 1, 2000. Available: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/overview.htm/ Accessed: May 24, 2000.
Feinerman, E, Choi, E.K., and Johnson, S.R.Uncertainty and Split Nitrogen Applications in Corn Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):975984.
Fisher, T. R., and Butt, A. J.. “The Role of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay Anoxia.” In Perspectives on Chesapeake Bay, 1994: Advances in Estuarine Sciences, eds., Nelson, S., and Elliott, P., pp. 143. Solomons Island, Maryland: Chesapeake Bay Program, 1994.
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. ”FAPRI 1996: U.S. Agricultural Outlook.” Staff Report #1-96, Iowa State University, University of Missouri-Columbia, August 1996.
Fuglie, Keith O. and Bosch, Darrell J.Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switching-Regression Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):981900.
Goh, S., Shih, C., Cochran, M.J., and Raskin, R., “A Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(1989): 175182.
Hall, J. and Howett, CiannatAlbemarle-Pamlico: Case Study in Pollutant Trading: Most of the Nutrients Came from Nonpoint Sources.” EPA Journal 20(1994):2729.
King, R., and Oamek, G.Risk Management by Colorado Dryland Wheat Farmers and the Elimination of the Disaster Assistance Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1983):247255.
Lambert, D. K.Risk Considerations in the Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Use in Agricultural Production.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15(1990):234244.
Meyer, J.Second Degree Stochastic Dominance With Respect to a Function.” International Economic Review 18(1977):477487.
National Research Council. Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda For Agriculture. Edited by Overton, J.. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993.
Norris, P.E. and Shabman, L.A.Economic and Environmental Considerations for Nitrogen Management in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1992): 148156.
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 1997 Cotton Information. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1997.
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. Water Quality Progress in North Carolina. 1988-1989 305(B) Report. Report No. 9007. Raleigh, North Carolina, 1990.
Novotny, V. and Olem, H.. Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.
Peng, Wei. “Risk Analysis of Adopting Conservation Practices on A Representative Peanut-Cotton Farm in Virginia.” Unpublished MS thesis. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, September 1997.
Randhir, Timothy O., and Lee, John G.. “Designing Spatial Incentives to Manage Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. Selected paper, Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, July 27-30, 1997. Toronto, Canada.
Ribaudo, M. O., Horan, R. D., and Smith, M. E.. “Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice.” Agricultural Economic Report AER 782. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., November 1999.
Rosegrant, M. W., and Roumasset, J. A.The Effect of Fertiliser on Risk: A Heteroscedastic Production Function with Measurable Stochastic Inputs.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 29(1985):107121.
Shanholtz, V.O. and Zhang, N.. Supplementary Information Of Virginia Geographic Information System. Special Report, VirGIS 88-21. Blacksburg, Virginia: VirGIS Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988.
Simpson, T.W., Donohue, S.J., Hawkins, G.W., Monnett, M.M., and Baker, J.C.. “The Development and Implementation of the Virginia Agronomic Land Use Evaluation System (VALUES).” Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, December 1992.
SriRamaratnam, S., Bessler, D. A., Rister, M. E., Matocha, J. E., and Novak, J.Fertilization Under Uncertainty: An Analysis Based on Producer Yield Expectations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1987):349357.
Sturt, Guy. “1997 Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis for Eastern Virginia.” Eastern District Farm Management Staff. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Staie University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1997a.
Sturt, Guy. Personal communication. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Dinwiddie, Virginia, 1997b.
Tauer, Loren W.Target MOTAD.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1983): 606610.
Teague, M. L., Bernardo, D. J., and Mapp, H. P.Farm-Level Economic Analysis Incorporating Stochastic Environmental Risk Assessment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):819.
USDA-Economic Research Service. “Albemarle-Pamlico Drainage Area Study Links Agricultural Production and Natural Resource DATA.” RTD Updates: Area Studies, Number 1. Economic Research Service, Washington D.C., January 1994.
USDA-SCS. Soil Survey of City of Suffolk, Virginia. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., June, 1981.
USDA, Soil Conservation Service, and Statistical Laboratory of Iowa State University. National Resources Inventory (1987): Instruction for Collecting Sample Data. Washington D.C., Government Printing Office, September 1986.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Water Quality Inventory: 1992 Report to Congress. EPA 841-R-94-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., March 1994.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Guidance for Water Quality-Based Decisions: The TMDL Process.” April 1991. Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/decisions/declc.html Accessed: February 24 1999.
VanDyke, Laura S., Bosch, Darrell J., and Pease, James W.Impacts of Within-Farm Spatial Variability on Nitrogen Pollution Control Costs.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1999):149159.
VanDyke, Laura S., Pease, James W., Bosch, Darrell J., and Baker, JamesNutrient Management Planning on Four Virginia Livestock Farms: Impacts on Net Income and Nutrient Losses.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 54(1999) :499505.
VanVuuren, W., Giraldez, C., and Stonehouse, D. P.. “Importance of Benefit Identification in Evaluating Water Pollution Control Programs.” Working Paper WP94/08, Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, June 1994.
Williams, J., Jones, S., and Dyke, P.. “The EPIC Model.” In EPIC—Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Documentation, eds., Sharpley, A.N. and Williams, J.R., pp. 329. USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1768. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Risk and Site Factors Affecting Potential Nitrogen Delivery in the Virginia Coastal Plain

  • Wei Peng (a1) and Darrell J. Bosch (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.