Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:38:39.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact on Profitability by Farm Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gerald Whittaker ,
Biing-Hwan Lin  and
Utpal Vasavada
Gerald Whittaker
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Biing-Hwan Lin
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Utpal Vasavada
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Get access

Abstract

A sample of 226 cash grain farms in the Lake States-Corn Belt region are analyzed to estimate the impact of restricting pesticide use on profits. These 226 farms are classified into small, medium, and large farms according to their sale revenues. The results suggest the existence of pest management practices that could substantially reduce pesticide use without incurring economic losses. The reductions in profits associated with gradual reductions in pesticide expenditure appear to increase with farm size.

Keywords

farm pesticide usefarm sizefrontier analysisprofit
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 352 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspelin, A.L., Grube, A.H., and Torla, R.. Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage: 1990 and 1991 Market Estimates. Economic Analysis Branch, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA, Fall 1992.Google Scholar
Burton, R.O. and Martin, M.A.. “Restrictions on Herbicide Use: An Analysis of the Economic Impacts on U.S. Agriculture.” North Central J. Agr. Econ., 9(1987): 181-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, CM., Martin, M.A., and McCarl, B.A.. “Economic Consequences of Bans on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Herbicides Commonly Used on Indiana Farms.” Weed Science, 29(1981):323-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. “Nonradial Technical Efficiency and Chemical Input Use in Agriculture.” Agr. and Res. Econ. Rev., 23(1994): 11–21.Google Scholar
Delvo, H.W.Economic Impact of Discontinuing Aldrin Use in Corn Production. Economic Research Service, USDA, ERS-557, June 1974.Google Scholar
Fare, R, Groskopf, S., and Lee, H.. “A Nonparametric Approach to Expenditure-Constrained Profit Maximization.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990):574-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fare, R, Groskopf, S., and Lovell, C.A.K.. The measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, W.L., Moffitt, L.J., and Davis, R.M.. “Short-Run Welfare Implications of Restricting Fungicide Use in Vegetable Production”. J. of Agribusiness, 10(1992):41–50.Google Scholar
Fox, G., Weersink, A., Sarwar, G., Duff, S., and Deen, B.. “Comparative Economics of Alternative Agricultural Production Systems: A Review.” Northeastern J. Agr. and Res. Econ., 20(1991): 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, R.D., Taylor, C.R., Penson, J.B., and Smith, E.G.. Economic Impacts of Reduced Chemical Use, published by Knutson and Associates, College Station, Texas, 1990.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A.Economics of Integrated Pest Management: An Interpretive Review of the Literature. Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University. Special Report 636, August 1981.Google Scholar
Norton, G.W. and Bemat, G.A. Jr. “Estimating the Effects of Pesticide Use on Burley and Flue-Cured Tobacco.” S. J. of Agr. Econ. 15(1983):93–99.Google Scholar
Osteen, C, Bradley, E., and Moffitt, L.. The Economics of Agricultural Pest Control: An Annotated Bibliography, 1960-80. Economic Research Service, USDA, Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture #14, January 1981.Google Scholar
Osteen, C. and Kuchler, F.. Potential Bans of Corn and Soybean Pesticides: Economic Implications for Farmers and Consumers. Economic Research Service, USDA, AER-546, April 1986.Google Scholar
Osteen, C.D.. and Szemedra, P.I.. Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues. Economic Research Service, USDA, AER-622, September 1989.Google Scholar
Rendleman, CM. “Agrichemical Reduction Policy: Its Effect on Income and Income Distribution.” J. Agr. Econ. Res. 43(1991):3–9.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.R. and Frohberg, K.K.. “The Welfare Effects of Erosion Controls, Banning Pesticides, and Limiting Fertilizer Application in the Corn Belt.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977):25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.R.., Lacewell, R.D., and Talpaz, H.. “Use of Extraneous Information with an Econometric Model to Evaluate Impacts of Pesticides Withdrawals.” W. J. Agr. Econ., 4(1979):1–7.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural. Resource and Environmental Indicators. Agr. Handbook 705, December 1994.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Resources: Inputs Situation and Outlook Report. AR-24, October 1991, p.19.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistical Service and Economic Research Service. Agricultural Chemical Usage. 1991 Field Crops Summary. Ag Ch 1(92), March 1992.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. and Morehart, M.. “Measuring the Effect of Farm Financial Structure on Cost Efficiency.” Agr. Finance Rev. 51(1991):95–105.Google Scholar