Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T06:55:14.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships of Labor Costs to Selected Variables in Flue-Cured Tobacco Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Garnett L. Bradford
Garnett L. Bradford*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Statistics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1960, data from “typical” enterprise budgets have been used extensively in several studies dealing with a wide variety of problems. Budgets were compiled in cost-of-production studies by Green, Pierce and Williams, Coutu and Mangum and the North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service. Without surprise, extensive use of these budgets has focused attention on their limitations.

More extensive and precise field measurements were needed for several cost items, particularly labor costs. In addition, certain types of cost-input or cost-output relationships were implicit in such constant-type coefficients—relationships which may or may not exist in reality. It may be true, for example, that X hours of priming labor are required to harvest Y pounds of tobacco, but it might require α + 1.8X hours to harvest 2Y pounds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , December 1970 , pp. 109 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bradford, G. L. and Nelson, L. A., Labor Costs in Conventional Production of Flue-Cured Tobacco: Their Magnitude and Variability, Tech. Bui. No. 190, Raleigh, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta., 1969.Google Scholar
2. Coutu, A. J. and Mangum, F. A., Farm Management Manual. Agr. Econ. Misc. Pubi. No. 1, Raleigh, Dept. of Agr. Econ., North Carolina State College, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Graybill, F. A., An Introduction to Linear Statistical Models, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1961.Google Scholar
4. Greene, R. E. L., Cost of Production Farm Products in North Carolina, Bui. 305, Raleigh, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta., 1936.Google Scholar
5. Hartman, L. M. and Tolley, G. S., Effects of Federal Acreage Controls on Costs and Techniques of Producing Flue-Cured Tobacco, Tech. Bui. No. 146, Raleigh, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta., 1961.Google Scholar
6. Hunt, J. B. Jr., Toussaint, W. D. and Woltz, W. G., AcreageControls and Poundage Controls: Their Effects on Most Profitable Production Practices for Flue-Cured Tobacco, Tech. Bui. No. 162, Raleigh, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta., 1964.Google Scholar
7. Johnston, J. Econometric Methods, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 1963.Google Scholar
8. North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, A Cost and Returns Guide for Selected Field Crops in North Carolina, Extension Cir. No. 462, Raleigh, North Carolina State University, 1965.Google Scholar
9. Pierce, W. H. and Williams, M. S., Cost of Producing Farm Products in North Carolina, A. E. Inf. Ser. No. 29, Raleigh, Dept. of Agr. Econ., North Carolina State College, 1952.Google Scholar
10. Seagraves, J. A. and Manning, R. C., Flue-Cured Tobacco Allotment Values and Uncertainty, 1934-1962, Econ. Res. Rep. No. 2, Raleigh, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University, 1967.Google Scholar