Skip to main content Accessibility help

Profit and Variance Analysis of Cotton Production Technologies and Rotation Crops in Georgia

  • Archie Flanders (a1), Fred C. White (a1), W. Don Shurley (a1) and Steve M. Brown (a2)


Genetically modified cotton varieties have the potential for increasing returns and/or decreasing labor requirements. A nonlinear optimization model is applied to a whole farm analysis for evaluating cotton production technologies. This model maximizes farm utility, composed of expected returns and their variability, at various risk aversion levels in order to evaluate cotton production technologies. Results show that while conventional cotton maximizes utility in a risk-neutral situation, transgenic cotton varieties entered into the optimal solution as higher levels of risk aversion were considered.



Hide All
Anderson, J.R., Dillon, J.L., and Hardaker, B.. Agriculture Decision Analysis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1977.
Babcock, B.A., and Hennessy, D.A.. “Input Demand under Yield and Revenue Insurance.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):428438.
Bryant, K.J., Allen, C.T., Bourland, F.M., and Earnest, L.D.. “Cost and Return Comparisons of Roundup Ready and BollGard Cotton Varieties.1999 Proceedings—Beltwide Cotton Conferences 1(1999):236238.
Frontline Systems, Inc. Solver. Incline Village, NV, 2000.
Georgia Agricultural Statistics Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts. Athens, GA, editions for 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000.
Gibson, J.W. IV, Laughlin, D.L., Luttrell, R.C., Parker, D., Reed, J., and Harris, A.. “Comparison of Costs and Returns Associated with Heliothis Resistant Bt Cotton to Non-Resistant Varieties.1997 Proceedings—Beltwide Cotton Conferences 1(1997):244247.
Huang, W.Y., Hewitt, T.I., and Shank, D.. “An Analysis of On-Farm Costs of Timing N Applications to Reduce N Losses.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23, 2(1998):445467.
McCarl, B.A., and Bessler, D.A.. “Estimating an Upper Bound on the Pratt Risk Aversion Coefficient When the Utility Function Is Unknown.Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33, 1(April 1989):5663.
McGriff, D.E., Hudgins, J., Steen, B., and Brown, S.M.. “Comparison of Transgenic and Conventional Cotton Varieties on Deep Sands.” University of Georgia, College of Agriculture, Department of Crop and Soil Science. Internet site: (Accessed April 15, 2000).
National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC, 1997.
Sandmo, A.On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.American Economic Review 61, 1(March 1971):6573.
Shurley, D. “Loan Deficiency Payments for 1998 Cotton.” University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, October 8, 1998.
Stark, C.R. Jr.. “Economics of Transgenic Cotton: Some Indications Based on Georgia Producers.1997 Proceedings—Beltwide Cotton Conferences 1(1997):251253.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency. “Georgia Report ID: MDR201-R001, State LDP Summary Totals.” Athens, GA, 1997-1999.
University of Georgia. 2000 Cotton Production Guide. Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Athens, GA, December 1999a.
University of Georgia. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis. Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural and Applied Economics, Athens, GA, 1998 and 1999b issues.
University of Georgia. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics. Economic Issues in Agriculture 15, 6(July 1999c).
University of Georgia. Performance Tests. State Variety Testing Program, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, Athens, GA, various issues.
University of Georgia. Using Machinery Costs to Make Decisions. College of Agriculture, March 1991.
Ward, C.W.Comparison of Conventional and Transgenic Technologies Under Alternative Cultural Practices for Cotton in Georgia.” M.S. thesis. University of Georgia, 2000.
Ward, C.W., Flanders, A., Isendildina, O., and White, F.C.. “Efficiency of Alternative Technologies and Cultural Practices for Cotton in Georgia.AgBioForum 5, 1(2002):1013.


Profit and Variance Analysis of Cotton Production Technologies and Rotation Crops in Georgia

  • Archie Flanders (a1), Fred C. White (a1), W. Don Shurley (a1) and Steve M. Brown (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed