Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:08:12.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Production of Economic Knowledge in Urban and Rural Areas: The Role of Student, Teacher, and School Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Roger Butters
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Carlos Asarta
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Eric Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Get access

Extract

Many states are adopting economic education standards for the K-12 curriculum, mandating economic education courses in rural and urban schools. We examine economic education outcomes for rural and urban students using test scores gathered during a national high school academic competition and by estimating a production function for economic education. We find only limited differences between the education production function in urban and rural settings and lower average scores for rural students. To close this gap, results suggest that rural schools should place economic content in the senior-year curriculum and provide teachers with increased postgraduate training in economics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allgood, S., and Walstad, W.B.. “The Longitudinal Effects of Economic Education.The Journal of Economic Education 30,2(1999):99111.10.1080/0022048990959594610.1080/00220489909595946Google Scholar
Anderson, G., and Benjamin, D.. “The Determinants of Success in University Introductory Economics Courses.The Journal of Economic Education 25,2(1994):99119.10.1080/00220485.1994.1084482010.1080/00220485.1994.10844820Google Scholar
Arias, J.J., and Walker, D.M.. “Additional Evidence on the Relationship between Class Size and Student Performance.The Journal of Economic Education 35,4(2004):311–29.10.3200/JECE.35.4.311-32910.3200/JECE.35.4.311-329Google Scholar
Baglin, R.F.Does ‘Nationally’ Normed Really Mean Nationally?Journal of Educational Measurements 18,2(1981):97107.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1981.tb00845.x10.1111/j.1745-3984.1981.tb00845.xGoogle Scholar
Ballard, L.B., and Johnson, M.F.. “Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Economics Class.The Journal of Economic Education 35,1(2004):323.10.3200/JECE.35.1.3-2310.3200/JECE.35.1.3-23Google Scholar
Becker, W., Greene, W., and Rosen, S.. “Research on High School Economics in the United States: Further Consideration.” An International Perspective on Economic Education, 93. Walstad, W.B., ed. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Klumer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Becker, W.E., and Powers, J.R.. “Student Performance, Attrition, and Class Size Given Missing Student Data.Economics of Education Review 20,4(2001):377–88.10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00060-110.1016/S0272-7757(00)00060-1Google Scholar
Boich, B.W., and Fels, R.. “A Note on Sex and Economic Education.The Journal of Economic Education 6,1(1974):6467.10.2307/1182608Google Scholar
Borg, M.O., Mason, P.M., and Shapiro, S.L.. “The Case of Effort Variables in Student Performance.The Journal of Economic Education 20,3(1989):309–13.Google Scholar
Borg, M.O., and Shapiro, S.L.. “Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics.The Journal of Economic Education 27,1(1996):325.10.1080/00220485.1996.1084489010.1080/00220485.1996.10844890Google Scholar
Borg, M.O., and Stranahan, H.A.. “Personality Type and Student Performance in Upper-level Economics Courses: The Importance of Race and Gender.The Journal of Economic Education 33,1(2002):314.10.1080/0022048020959612010.1080/00220480209596120Google Scholar
Borland, M.V., and Howsen, R.M.. “A Note on Student Academic Performance.American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58,3(1999):537–16.10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03306.x10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03306.xGoogle Scholar
Bosshardt, W., and Watts, M.. “Instructor Effects and Their Determinants in Precollege Economic Education.The Journal of Economic Education 21,3(1990):265–76.10.1080/00220485.1990.10844674Google Scholar
Broomhall, D.E., and Johnson, T.G.. “Economic Factors That Influence Educational Performance in Rural Schools.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76,3(1994):557–67.10.2307/124366610.2307/1243666Google Scholar
Butters, R.B., and Asarta, C.J.. “A Survey of Economic Understanding in U.S. High Schools.The Journal of Economic Education 42,2(2011):200205.10.1080/00220485.2011.555723Google Scholar
Butters, R.B., and Fischer, T.. “Establishing State Specific Benchmarks in Economic Education.Journal of Consumer Education 25(2008):6172.Google Scholar
Cohn, E., and Geske, T.. The Economics of Education, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Council on Economic Education. Survey of the States: A Report Card. Internet site: www.councilforeconed.org/about/survey2009/ (Accessed February 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Czelusniak, S.The Crisis of Economic Illiteracy.” Journal of the James Madison Institute. 44, Spring/Summer(2009):21.Google Scholar
Danes, S.M., Huddleston-Casas, C., and Boyce, L.. “Financial Planning Curriculum for Teens: Impact Evaluation.Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning 10,1(1999):2537.Google Scholar
Ferber, M.A.Gender and the Study of Economics.” The Principles of Economics Course. Walstad, W.B., and Saunders, P., eds. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.Google Scholar
Ferber, M.A., Birnbaum, B.G., Green, C.A., and Becker, W.E.. “Gender Differences in Economic Knowledge: A Réévaluation of the Evidence.The Journal of Economic Education 14,2(1983):2437.10.1080/00220485.1983.1084501310.1080/00220485.1983.10845013Google Scholar
Hancock, T.M.Effects of Class Size on College Student Achievement.” College Student Journal 30,4(1996) :479–81.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, M., Moore, R.L., and Brown, E.. “Exploring the Gender Gap on the GRE Subject Test in Economics.The Journal of Economic Education 26,1(1995):4148.10.1080/00220485.1995.10844852Google Scholar
Horvath, J., Beaudin, B., and Wright, S.. “Persisting in the Introductory Economics Course: An Exploration of Gender Differences.The Journal of Economic Education 23,2(1992):101108.10.1080/00220485.1992.1084474410.1080/00220485.1992.10844744Google Scholar
Jacques, C.B., Brorsen, W., and Richter, F.G.C.. “Consolidating Rural School Districts: Potential Savings and Effects on Student Achievement.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32,3(2000):573–83.10.1017/S1074070800020666Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.E., and Siegfried, J.J.. “Class Size and Achievement in Introductory Economics: Evidence from the TUCE III Data.Economics of Education Review 16,4(1997):385–94.10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00063-510.1016/S0272-7757(96)00063-5Google Scholar
Laband, D.N., and Piette, M.J.. “Does Who Teaches Principles of Economics Matter?The American Economic Review 85,20(1995):335–38.Google Scholar
Lopus, J.S., and Maxwell, N.L.. “Ethnic Differences in Learning College Economics: An Empirical Analysis.” Unpublished manuscript presented at the Allied Social Science Association, 1993.Google Scholar
Lopus, J.S., and Maxwell, N.L.. “Teaching Tools: Should We Teach Microeconomic Principles before Macroeconomic Principles?Economic Inquiry 33,2(1995):336–50.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1995.tb01866.x10.1111/j.1465-7295.1995.tb01866.xGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, K.G., Scott, A., and Becker, W.E.. “The Economics Student Reexamined: Male—Female Differences in Comprehension.The Journal of Economic Education 18,4(1987):365–75.10.1080/00220485.1987.10845228Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. Tables and Figures. Internet site: http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/(Accessed May 15, 2010).Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. Tables and Figures. Internet site: http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/commonfiles/glossary.asp (Accessed May 15, 2010).Google Scholar
Provasnik, S., Kewal, A. Ramani, M.M. Coleman, L. Gilberton W., Herring, and Xie, Q.. Status of Education in Rural America (NCES 2007-040). Washington D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education, 2007.Google Scholar
Raimondo, HJ., Esposito, L., and Gershenberg, I.. “Introductory Class Size and Student Performance in Intermediate Theory Courses.The Journal of Economic Education 21,4(1990):369–81.10.1080/00220485.1990.10844682Google Scholar
Rebeck, K.Economic Literacy in U.S. High Schools.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2002.Google Scholar
Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E.A., and Kain, J.F.. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.Econometrica, Econometric Society 73,2(2005):417–58.10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.xGoogle Scholar
Rockoff, J.E.The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data.The American Economic Review 94,2(2004):247–52.10.1257/0002828041302244Google Scholar
Siegfried, J.J.Male-Female Differences in Economic Education: A Survey.The Journal of Economic Education 10,2(1979):111.10.1080/00220485.1979.10845477Google Scholar
Siegfried, J.J., and Kennedy, P.E.. “Does Pedagogy Vary with Class Size in Introductory Economics?The American Economic Review 82,2(1995):347–51.Google Scholar
Siegfried, J.J., and Walstad, W.B.. “Research on College Economics.” Teaching Undergraduate Economics: A Handbook for Instruction. Walstad, W.B., and Saunders, P., eds, pp. 141–66. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1998.Google Scholar
Swope, K.J., and Schmitt, P.M.. “The Performance of Economic Graduates over the Entire Curriculum: The Determinants of Success.The Journal of Economic Education 37,4(2006):387–94.10.3200/JECE.37.4.387-394Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), 2006 Economic Assessment. Internet site: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/(Accessed May 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Waiden, M.L., and Sisak, M.R.. “School Inputs and Educational Outcomes in North Carolina: Comparison of Static and Dynamic Analyses.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,3(1999):593609.S1074070800008865Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Butters, R.B.. “Computer versus Paper Testing in Precollege Economics.The Journal of Economic Education 42,4(2011):366–74.10.1080/00220485.2011.606087Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Rebeck, K.. The Test of Economic Literacy (3rd Ed.): Examiner's Manual. New York: National Council on Economic Education, 2001a.Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Rebeck, K.. “Assessing the Economic Understanding of U.S. High School Students.” The American Economic Review 91(2001b):452–57.10.1257/aer.91.2.452Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., Rebeck, K., and Butters, R.B.. Test of Economic Knowledge (Second edition): Examiner's Manual. New York: National Council on Economic Education, 2010a.Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., Rebeck, K., and Butters, R.B.. Basic Economics Test (Third edition): Examiner's Manual. New York: National Council on Economic Education, 2010b.Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Robson, D.. “Differential Item Functioning and Male—Female Differences in Multiple Choice Tests in Economics.The Journal of Economic Education 28,2(1997):155–71.10.1080/00220489709595917Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Soper, J.C.. “A Model of Economic Learning in the High Schools.The Journal of Economic Education 13,1(1982):4054.10.1080/00220485.1982.10844993Google Scholar
Walstad, W.B., and Soper, J.C.. “What Is High School Economics? Factors Contributing to Student Achievement and Attitudes.The Journal of Economic Education 20,1(1989):3957.10.1080/00220485.1989.10844610Google Scholar
Williams, M.L., Waldauer, C., and Duggal, V.C.. “Gender Differences in Economic Knowledge: An Extension of the Analysis.The Journal of Economic Education 23,3(1992):219–31.10.1080/00220485.1992.10844756Google Scholar
Ziegert, A.L.The Role of Personality Temperament and Student Learning in Principles of Economics.The Journal of Economic Education 31,4(2000):307–22.10.1080/00220480009596449Google Scholar