Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:27:54.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Portfolios of Agricultural Market Advisory Services: How Much Diversification Is Enough?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

Silvina M. Cabrini
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL
Brian G. Stark
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL
Scott H. Irwin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL
Darrel L. Good
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL
Joao Martines-Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL
Get access

Abstract

This study analyzes the potential risk-reduction gains from naive diversification among market advisory services for corn and soybeans. The total possible decrease in risk through naive diversification is small, mainly because advisory prices are highly correlated on average. Moreover, because marginal risk-reduction benefits decrease rapidly with size and the cost of holding the portfolios increases linearly due to services' subscription fees, it is optimal to limit portfolio size to a few advisory programs. Based on certainty equivalent measures and two representative risk-aversion levels, preferred portfolio sizes are between one and three programs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billingsley, R.S., and Chance, D.M.. “Benefits and Limitations of Diversification Among Commodity Trading Advisors.Journal of Portfolio Management 23(1996):6580.10.3905/jpm.1996.409581Google Scholar
Elton, E.J., and Gruber, M.J.. “Risk Reduction and Portfolio Size: An Analytical Solution.Journal of Business 50(1977):415–37.10.1086/295964Google Scholar
Evans, J., and Archer, S.. “Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion–An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Finance 23(1968):761–67.Google Scholar
Gehrt, D., and Good, D.L.. “Evaluation of Market Advisory Services for Corn and Soybeans.Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 57(1993): 17.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, L.A., Irwin, S.H., Good, D.L., Martines-Filho, J., Sherrick, B., and Schnitkey, G.D.. “New Generation Grain Marketing Contracts.” AgMAS Project Research Report 2003-01, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2003.Google Scholar
Henker, T.Naïve Diversification for Hedge Funds.Journal of Alternative Investments 1(1998):3338.10.3905/jai.1998.407860Google Scholar
Irwin, S.H., Martines-Filho, J., and Good, D.L.. “The Pricing Performance of Market Advisory Services In Corn and Soybeans Over 1995-2000.” AgMAS Project Research Report 2002-01, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2002.Google Scholar
Isengildina, O., Pennings, J.M.E., Irwin, S.H., and Good, D.L.. “Crop Farmers' Use of Market Advisory Services.” AgMAS Project Research Report 2004-03. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.Google Scholar
Lattz, D.H., Cagley, C.E., and Raab, D.D.. Summary of Illinois Farm Records for 2000. Circular 1375B, University of Illinois Extension, 2001.Google Scholar
Lhabitant, E.S., and Learned, M.. “Hedge Fund Diversification: How Much is Enough?Journal of Alternative Investments 5(2002): 2349.10.3905/jai.2002.319062Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection.Journal of Finance 7(1952):7791.Google Scholar
Martines-Filho, J.G.Pre-Harvest Marketing Strategies for Corn and Soybeans: A Comparison of Optimal Hedging Models and Market Advisory Service Recommendations.” Ph.D. dissertation. The Ohio State University, 1996.Google Scholar
Myers, R.J.Econometric Testing for Risk Averse Behavior in Agriculture.Applied Economics 21(1989):541–52.10.1080/758519718Google Scholar
Patrick, G.F., Musser, W.N., and Eckman, D.T.. “Forward Marketing Practices and Attitudes of Large-Scale Midwestern Grain Farmers.Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1998):3853.10.2307/1349532Google Scholar
Saha, A., Shumway, C.R., and Talpaz, H.. “Joint Estimation of Risk Preference Structure and Technology Using Expo-Power Utility.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994): 173–84.10.2307/1243619Google Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., Parcell, J.L., Kastens, T.L., and Dhuyvetter, K.C.. “Perceptions of Marketing Strategies: Farmers vs. Extension Economists.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1998):279–93.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W.F.A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.Management Science 9(1963):277–93.10.1287/mnsc.9.2.277Google Scholar
Statman, M.How Many Stocks Make a Diversified Portfolio?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22(1987):353–63.10.2307/2330969S0022109000012680Google Scholar
Szpiro, G.G.Measuring Risk Aversion: An Alternative Approach.Review of Economics and Statistics 68(1986): 156–59.10.2307/1924939Google Scholar
Tomek, W.G., and Peterson, H.H.. “Risk Management in Agricultural Markets: A Review.Journal of Futures Markets 21(2001):953–85.10.1002/fut.2004Google Scholar