Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A New Look at the Economic Evaluation of Wind Energy as an Alternative to Electric and Natural Gas-Powered Irrigation

  • Dmitry Lima (a1), Gregory Colson (a1), Berna Karali (a1), Bridget Guerrero (a2), Stephen Amosson (a3) and Michael Wetzstein (a1)...

Abstract

An extension of the Guerrero et al. (2010) net present value (NPV) analysis using real options analysis (ROA) is offered to improve machinery replacement decisions. Specifically, the feasibilities of replacing natural gas irrigation systems with either electric or hybrid (electric/wind) systems are evaluated. Results indicate NPV and ROA criteria can yield opposite decisions depending on the stochastic nature of the parameters, reversibility of the investment, and flexibility of investment timing. For policy, NPV results indicate that replacing natural gas with a hybrid is on the cusp of being optimal. However, ROA indicates this NPV implication may not hold.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Black, F., and Scholes., M.The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” The Journal of Political Economy 81(1973):637-54.
Carey, J.M., and Zilberman., D.A Model of Investment under Uncertainty: Modern Irrigation Technology and Emerging Markets in Water.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(2002): 171-83.
Dixit, A., and Pindyck., R.Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Dykes, K., and Neufville., R.Real Options for a Wind Farm in Wapakoneta, Ohio: Incorporating Uncertainty into Economic Feasibility Studies for Community Wind. World Wind Energy Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, June 2008. Internet site: http://ardent.mit.edu/real_options/Real_opts_papers/Dykes_%20WWEC%202008_Final_Oct08.pdf (Accessed May 2012).
EIA. Natural Gas. Natural Gas Weekly Update, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2012. Internet site: http://205.254.135.7/naturalgas/weekly/ (Accessed May 2012).
Elmer, N., Thurow, A., Johnson, J., and Rosson., C.An Ex Ante Assessment of Investments in Texas Grapefruit under Uncertainty.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(2001): 391401.
Gonzalez, A., Karali, B., and Wetzstein., M.A Public Policy Aid for Bioenergy Investment: Case Study of Failed Plants.” Energy Policy 51(2012):465-73.
Guerrero, B., Amosson, S., Marek, T., and Johnson., J.Economic Evaluation of Wind Energy as an Alternative to Natural Gas Powered Irrigation.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010):277-87.
Lee, S., and Shih., L.Renewable Energy Policy Evaluation using Real Option Model–The Case of Taiwan.” Energy Economics 32, Suppl 1(2010):S6778.
Lima, D.Economic Valuation of Wind Energy through a Real Options Approach. M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, 2012.
Luna, A., Assuad, C., and Dyner., I.Wind Energy in Colombia: An Approach from the Real Options.” Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society in New York City, July 2003.
McClintock, A.Investment in Irrigation Technology: Water Use Change, Public Policy and Uncertainty,” Technical Report No. 01/10, Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, Victoria, Australia, 2010.
McDonald, R., and Siegel., D.The Value of Waiting to Invest.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(1986):707–27.
Merton, R.Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4(1973): 141-83.
Mezey, E.W., and Conrad., J.M.Real Options in Resource Economics.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 2(2010):3352.
Michailidis, A., and Mattas., K.Using Real Options Theory to Irrigation Dam Investment Analysis: An Application of Binomial Option Pricing Mode.” Water Resources Management 21(2007):1717-33.
Munoz, J., Contreras, J., Caamano, J., and Correia., P.Risk Assessment of Wind Power Generation Project Investments Based on Real Options.” IEEE Bucharest Power Technical Conference, Bucharest, Romania, 2009.
Myers, S.Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics 5(1977): 147-75.
Richards, T.J., and Green., G.P.Economic Hysteresis in Variety Selection.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 35(2003): 114.
Seo, S., Segarra, E., Mitchell, P.D., and Leatham., D.J.Irrigation Technology Adoption and its Implication for Water Conservation in the Texas High Plains: A Real Options Approach.” Agricultural Economics 38(2008):4755.
Tareen, I.Y., Wetzstein, M.E., and Duffield., J.A.Biodisel as a Substitute for Petroleum Diesel in a Stochastic Environment.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32(2000):373–81.
Venetsanos, K., Angelopoulou, P., and Tsoutsos., T.Renewable Energy Sources Project Appraisal under Uncertainty, the Case of Wind Energy Exploitation within a Changing Energy Market Environment.” Energy Policy 30(2002):293307.
Wetzstein, M.E.Microeconomic Theory: Concepts and Connections. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge Publisher, 2013.

Keywords

A New Look at the Economic Evaluation of Wind Energy as an Alternative to Electric and Natural Gas-Powered Irrigation

  • Dmitry Lima (a1), Gregory Colson (a1), Berna Karali (a1), Bridget Guerrero (a2), Stephen Amosson (a3) and Michael Wetzstein (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed