Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Monitoring Inefficiency in Public Education

  • Yoshie Saito (a1) and Christopher S. McIntosh (a2)

Abstract

The efficiency of public education is examined using a cost indirect output distance function. Efficiency estimates are obtained using data envelopment analysis applied to data from Georgia public schools. Georgia school districts utilize educational budgets with reasonable efficiency, achieving an overall efficiency of 98% with a range of 93%–100%. If all school districts were 100% efficient, outputs could be expanded 2%. This could be achieved by increasing funding $75.46 million state-wide in total for each of the 3 years. From the consumers' (voters') point of view, this result suggests that inefficiency costs Georgia, on average, a total of $226.38 million from 1994 to 1996.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Benabou, R.Equity and Efficiency in Human Capital Investment: The Local Connection.Review of Economic Studies 63(April 1996):237264.
Benabou, R.. “Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth: Macroeconomic Implications of Community Structure and School Finance.American Economic Review 86, 3(June 1996):584609.
Borjas, G.J.Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility.Quarterly Journal of Economics CVII, 1(1992):123150.
Borjas, G.J.. “Ethnicity, Neighborhoods, and Human-Capital Externalities.American Economic Review (1995):365390.
Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., and Holland, B.P.. Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Card, D., and Krueger, A.B.. “Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States.Journal of Political Economy 10(1992):140.
Card, D., and Krueger, A.B.. “School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina.Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1996):3150.
Chakraborty, K., Biswas, B., and Lewis, W.C.. “Measurement of Technical Efficiency in Public Education: A Stochastic and Nonstochastic Production Function Approach.Southern Economic Journal 67(2001):889905.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E.. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.European Journal of Operational Research 2(1978):429444.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Knox Lovell, C.A.. “An Indirect Approach to the Evaluation of Producer Performance.Journal of Public Economics 37(1988):7189.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Weber, W.L.. “Measuring School District Performance.Public Finance Quarterly 17(1985):409428.
Finn, J.D., and Achilles, C.M.. “Answers and Questions About Class Size: A Statewide Experiment.American Education Research Journal 27(1990):556577.
Georgia Department of Education, Accountability Unit. Georgia Public Education Report Cards, 1994–95, 1995–96, 1996–97. Internet site: www.doe.k12.ga.us (Accessed 1999-2002).
Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K.J.. Taylor, L.L., and Weber, W.L.. “Budget-Constrained Frontier Measures of Fiscal Equality and Efficiency in Schooling.Review of Economics and Statistics 79(1997):116124.
Hanushek, A.E.The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.Journal of Economic Literature 16(1986):11411177.
Hanushek, A.E., and Taylor, L.L.. “Alternative Assessments of the Performance of Schools: Measurement of State Variations in Achievement.Journal of Human Resources 25(1990):179201.
Hanushek, A.E., Rivkin, S.G., and Taylor, L.L.. “Aggregation and the Estimated Effects of School Resources.Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1996):611627.
Harris, J.F.In Georgia … Quality Basis Education.NASSP Bulletin 70, 491(1986):36, 3840.
Johnson, E.G., and Stafford, F.P.. “On the Rate of Return to Schooling Quality.Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1996):686691.
Loeb, S., and Bound, J.. “The Effect of Measured School Inputs in Academic Achievement: Evidence from the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s Birth Cohorts.Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1996):653663.
Lovell, C.A., Walters, L.C., and Wood, L.. “Stratified Models of Education Production using Regression Analysis.” Working Paper No. 90-5, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 1990.
McCarty, A.T., and Yaisawarng, S.. “Technical Efficiency in New Jersey School Districts.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Techniques and Applications. Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, S.S., eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Meyer, H.R.Value-Added Indicators of School Performance: A Primer.Economics of Education Review 16(1997):283301.
Murnane, R.J., Whillett, J.B., and Levy, F.. “The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination.Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1995):251266.
Prais, S.J., and Houthakker, H.S.. The Analysis of Family Budgets. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Ray, S.C.Resource-use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data.Management Science 37(1991):16201628.
Ruggiero, J.On the Measurement of Technical Efficiency in the Public Sector.European Journal of Operational Research 90(1996):553565.
Sander, W.Catholic High Schools and Rural Academic Achievement.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):112.
Thanassoulis, E.Assessing the Effectiveness of Schools With Pupils of Different Ability Using Data Envelopment Analysis.Journal of the Operational Research Society 47(1996):8497.
The White House. Internet site: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus//compassionate/edu-cation.html (Accessed October 2002).

Keywords

Monitoring Inefficiency in Public Education

  • Yoshie Saito (a1) and Christopher S. McIntosh (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed