Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:30:49.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Misspecification in Simultaneous Systems: An Alternative Test and Its Application to a Model of the Shrimp Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

J. D. Lea
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
J. S. Shonkwiler
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access

Abstract

Concern over the effects of public policies based on misspecified econometric models motivates interest in a procedure to test, diagnose, and improve the specification of models that have been estimated with three-stage least squares. A test of system-wide specification based on Hausman's specification test is employed in a test of the a priori restrictions placed on the parameters of a structural model of the U.S. shrimp market. The null hypothesis of proper specification is rejected. After diagnosis via a comparison of unrestricted and restricted reduced forms and respecification, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryon, R.P.. “Testing for Misspecification in Econometric Systems Using Full Information.Int. Econ. Rev., 13(1972):745756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhrymes, P.J.. “Restricted and Unrestricted Reduced Forms: Asymptotic Distribution and Relative Efficiency.Econometrica, 41 (1973):119134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fomby, T.B., Hill, R. C., and Johnson, S. R.. Advanced Econometric Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A.R., and Jorgenson, D. W.. “Statistical Inference for a System of Simultaneous, Non-Linear, Implicit Equations in the Context of Instrumental Variable Estimation.J. Econometrics, 11 (1979):275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J.A.. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.Econometrica, 46(1978):12511271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G.G., Hill, R. C., Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, T.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second Edition. New York: Wiley, 1985.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kramer, W., and Sonnberger, H.. “Computational Pitfalls of the Hausman Test.J. Econ. Dynamics and Control, 10(1986):163165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, J.D.. “A Dynamic Econometric Model of the U.S. Shrimp Market.” Ph.D. dissertation. Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesvile, Florida, 1988.Google Scholar
Prochaska, F.J., and Keithly, W. R.. “Market Impacts of U.S. Shrimp Imports.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Shrimp and Prawn Markets, pp. 19. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University, International Institute of Fisheries Economics, 1984.Google Scholar
Rao, C.R.. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. New York: Wiley, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide, 1979 Edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc., 1979.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P.Econometrics. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1976.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.E., Roberts, K. J., and Pawlyk, P. W.. “Structure Changes in U.S. Shrimp Markets.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Shrimp and Prawn Markets, pp. 1123. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University, International Institute of Fisheries Economics, 1984.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K.Competitive Storage, Rational Expectations, and Short-Run Food Price Determination.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):739748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A., and Palm, F.. “Time Series Analysis and Simultaneous Equation Econometric Models.J. Econometrics, 2(1974):1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar